Survey of opioid tapering practices of pediatric healthcare providers: A national perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Fisher, PhD, RN, PPCNP-BC ◽  
Suzanne W. Ameringer, PhD, RN
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Pediatric Pain ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Opioid Tapering ◽  
Pediatric Healthcare

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the current opioid tapering practice.Design: Cross-sectional, online, survey research.Participants: Pediatric healthcare providers from a national sample of practicing nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians who participate in five different pediatric pain and/or palliative care list serves.Results: One hundred four participants responded to the survey. The respondents were predominantly physicians (n = 58, 62 percent). The majority of respondents worked in an academic children's medical center (n = 50, 52 percent). The average number of years in pediatric practice was 16 (mean = 16.33, range of 0-45 years). Of the 104 respondents, only 22 (27 percent) had a written protocol for opioid tapering. Use of expert consultants such as pharmacists or pediatric pain management teams varied. The majority of respondents (n = 46, 44 percent) seldom or never consult a pharmacist. Only 22 percent (n = 17) almost always or always consult a pediatric pain team. There was a wide range of personal tapering rate preferences. Conclusions: This study provided a baseline assessment of pediatric opioid tapering practices by pediatric healthcare providers. Results revealed a marked variation in practice patterns that may indicate deficits in the assessment and management of opioid withdrawal in children. The need for the development of assessment-based opioid tapering guidelines for the pediatric population is long overdue.

scholarly journals Pediatric HEALTHCARE Provider Awareness, Confidence, and Use of Sports Specialization Recommendations and Application towards Youth Athlete Counseling

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0014
Author(s):  
Tamara Valovich McLeod ◽  
Traci Snedden ◽  
Eric Post ◽  
Tracy Zaslow ◽  
Shelly Fetchen-DiCesaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Medical Society ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background: Sport specialization is increasingly common in many youth sports and has been linked to increased injury, overtraining, and burnout. Several organizations have developed safe sport recommendations in an effort to mitigate injury risk. Healthcare providers (HCPs) can be a source of education for parents and athletes on safe sports practices, but the awareness, confidence, and use of these recommendations among HCPs who work with youth athletes is limited. Hypothesis/Purpose: To evaluate the awareness, confidence, and use of sports specialization and safe sport recommendations of HCPs who work with pediatric athletes. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was developed to assess pediatric HCP awareness of, confidence in, and clinical use of sports specialization recommendations. The survey included 1) personal demographics, 2) professional demographics, 3) knowledge and perceptions of sport specialization, 4) awareness, confidence, and use of recommendations, and 5) HCP program training and professional development background specific to sports specialization. Survey links were sent by email to 5000 secondary school athletic trainers and 297 PRiSM members during October 2019-January 2020. The survey was open for 4 weeks, with a reminder email sent after 2 weeks. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: The survey was accessed by 620 HCPs (access rate=11.7%) and completed by 508 HCPs (completion rate=81.9%). Respondents (279 females, 228 males; age=37.2±10.5 years) included athletic trainers (74.5%, n=379), physicians (16.9%, n=86, physical therapists (6.7%, n=35), nurse practitioners (1.0%, n=5), and physician assistants (0.1%, n=4) with 11.2±9.1 years of experience providing care to pediatric athletes. Three-fourths of respondents (n=373) were aware of recommendations from the National Athletic Trainers’ Association, but fewer were aware of those from the American Academic of Pediatrics (42.3%, n=212), American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (40.3%, n=200), American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (45.2%, n=225), International Olympic Committee (14.2%, n=69), Major League Baseball (30.6%, n=151), USA Hockey (13.6%, n=66), and National Basketball League (9.3%, n=45). The percentage of respondents who were confident in knowledge of (Table 1) and used (Table 2) each organization’s recommendation are provided in the tables. Table 3 presents the degree to which various reasons limit the use of sports specialization recommendations. Conclusion: Healthcare providers are aware of sport specialization recommendations and believe they are associated with decreased risk of injury. However, barriers to applying the recommendations most cited were the inability of parents and children to change specialization behaviors. Future research should focus on implementation of recommendations to enact behavior change. Tables [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

scholarly journals US haemophilia centre nurses and advanced practice providers: Demographics, roles/responsibilities, training, educational barriers and employment benefits

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L. Witkop ◽  
Christine Guelcher ◽  
Margaret Hall ◽  
Jennifer Maahs
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
The United States ◽  
Educational Opportunities ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Employment Benefits

Abstract Introduction: As the focus on personalised treatment is refined, more products are brought to market and the life expectancy of persons with haemophilia increases, there will be an expanded need of experienced and expert healthcare providers to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Aim: This survey describes the demographics, roles/ responsibilities, practice patterns, educational opportunities/barriers and employment benefits of nurses and advanced practices providers (APPs), including advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and physician assistants (PAs) employed by haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) across the United States. Methods: This one-time convenience online survey was approved by the Munson Medical Center Institutional Review Board. A survey of this type had never been attempted in the HTC nursing community; therefore. there was no opportunity to utilise a previous tool. Data was analysed using statistical tools through SurveyMonkey. Results: Gaps were identified in provider age distribution, research opportunities, and standardised educational opportunities for APPs. An aging but highly educated HTC nursing population is revealed: over 50% of respondents were over the age of 50; the majority held at least a baccalaureate degree and almost half had national board certification; most were experienced in healthcare but newer to the field of bleeding disorders. Conclusion: Development of an APP fellowship program would standardise the care and treatment of those with bleeding and clotting disorders across the United States. This fellowship should include a didactic portion, advocacy within the community, mentorship with experienced APPs and regular webinar-based case studies to review current trends in care. This survey is a call to action to begin standardised education programs for the advanced practice role.

scholarly journals Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions of Challenges with Frequent Users of Emergency Department Care in Switzerland: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 004695802110281
Author(s):  
Patrick Bodenmann ◽  
Miriam Kasztura ◽  
Madison Graells ◽  
Elodie Schmutz ◽  
Oriane Chastonay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Frequent Users ◽  
Complex Needs ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ed Overcrowding ◽  
Ed Visits

Frequent users of emergency departments (FUED; ≥ 5 ED visits/year) commonly cumulate medical, social, and substance use problems requiring complex and sustained care coordination often unavailable in ED. This study aimed to explore ED healthcare providers’ challenges related to FUED care to gain insight into the support and resources required to address FUED complex needs. An online survey was sent to all general adult emergency services within Switzerland (N = 106). Participants were asked to indicate the extent to which they perceived that FUED represented a problem and to describe the main challenges encountered. In total, 208 physicians and nurses from 75 EDs (70.7%) completed the survey. Among the 208 participants, 134 (64%) reported that FUED represented a challenge and 133 described 1 to 5 challenges encountered. A conventional content analysis yielded 4 main categories of perceived challenges. Negative consequences in the ED secondary to FUED’s presence (eg, ED overcrowding, staff helplessness, and fatigue) was the most frequently reported challenge, followed by challenges related to FUEDs’ characteristics (eg, mental health and social problems) leading to healthcare complexity. The third most frequently encountered challenge was related to the ED inappropriateness and inefficiency to address FUEDs’ needs. Finally, challenges related to the lack of FUED healthcare network were the least often mentioned. ED healthcare providers experience a wide range of challenges related to FUED care. These findings suggest that currently EDs nor their staff are equipped to address FUEDs’ complex needs.

Healthcare Providers Face Numerous Challenges in Treating Patients with Psoriasis: Results from a Mixed-Methods Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 247553032110628
Author(s):  
Suzanne Murray ◽  
Jeffrey Crowley ◽  
Melinda J. Gooderham ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Vinod Chandran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Practice Gaps

Background The paradigm shift toward biologic medications in psoriasis care requires healthcare providers (HCPs) to become acquainted with mechanisms of action and safety profiles of these new treatments to confidently use them in practice. A better understanding of this paradigm shift is necessary to provide adequate education for HCPs in psoriasis care. Objectives This study assessed clinical practice gaps and challenges experienced by HCPs caring for patients with psoriasis. Methods A mixed-methods approach was used to identify practice gaps and clinical challenges of dermatologists, rheumatologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners with various levels of clinical experience in academic and community-based settings. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected sequentially. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analyzed. Results A total of 380 psoriasis care providers in Canada and the US participated in this study. Analysis revealed challenges in establishing an accurate diagnosis of psoriasis (including screening for sub-type and distinguishing psoriasis from other skin conditions), selecting treatment (particularly regarding recently approved treatments), monitoring side effects, and collaborating with other HCPs involved in psoriasis care. Conclusion These findings highlight educational needs of HCPs involved in psoriasis care that could have repercussions on accurate and timely diagnosis of the condition, treatment initiation, side effect monitoring, and continuity of care. Findings provide a starting point for clinicians to reflect on their practice and for the improvement of continuing professional development interventions that would bridge these gaps.

Primary Care Population Management for COVID-19 Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
MD Deborah Blazey-Martin ◽  
FNP Elizabeth Barnhart ◽  
Joseph Gillis ◽  
Gabriela Andujar Vazquez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Population Management ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Primary Care Population ◽  
At Home

Abstract BACKGROUND: Most patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have mild to moderate symptoms manageable at home; however up to 20% develop severe illness requiring additional support. Primary care practices performing population management can use these tools to remotely assess and manage COVID-19 patients and identify those needing additional medical support before becoming critically ill.AIM: We developed an innovative population management approach for managing COVID-19 patients remotely.SETTING: Development, implementation, and evaluation took place in April 2020 within a large urban academic medical center primary care practice.PARTICIPANTS: Our panel consists of 40,000 patients. By April 27, 2020, 305 had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. Outreach was performed by teams of doctors, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurses.PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Our innovation includes an algorithm, an EMR component, and a twice daily population report for managing COVID-19 patients remotely.PROGRAM EVALUATION: Of the 305 patients with COVID-19 in our practice at time of submission, 196 had returned to baseline; 54 were admitted to hospitals, six of these died, and 40 were discharged.DISCUSSION: Our population management strategy helped us optimize at-home care for our COVID-19 patients and enabled us to identify those who require inpatient medical care in a timely fashion.

Heightened malpractice risk for hospitalist physicians in the USA: what to know and what to do

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1128) ◽  
pp. 531-533
Author(s):  
Zachary R Paterick ◽  
Timothy Edward Paterick
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Medical Providers ◽  
Professional Liability ◽  
Optimal Patient Care ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Unique Relationship

Hospitalists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and institutions are all at risk for the potential professional liability issues. The unique relationship between healthcare providers and their sponsoring institution generates complex and evolving legal issues for all participants. The law has played a great role integrating quality care and patient safety with physicians, while providing an avenue for relief when a medical error occurs. The intersection of law and medicine, while allowing for optimal patient care, exposes participating medical providers and the sponsoring institutions to specific professional liability issues. This article addresses the heightened medical practice risk that hospitalist physicians’ encounter in today’s practice of hospital medicine.

Students’ lack of knowledge regarding healthcare providers’ duties, and their preferences for information when selecting new providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Perrault
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Midwestern Usa

Rationale, aims and objectives: When USA college students need medical care, their first destinations are usually campus health centers. Normally, staffed by a variety of care providers (e.g., nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physicians), students may be confused about who they may need to see and possibly hesitant to receive care. The present study sought to determine students’ knowledge about primary care providers and the qualities they would like to know about them prior to consultations. The goal of this paper is to improve the information campus health centers in terms of their ability to provide students health solutions when and where they need them. Methods: 534 USA college students from a large Midwestern USA university completed a web-based survey about their knowledge, attitudes and information preferences regarding their various care providers. They also viewed 3 experimentally manipulated biographies of providers and chose the provider they would want to visit. Results: The majority of students did not know the differences between physicians, physician assistants and nurse practitioners and the types of care that they could provide. About 9% stated they would not seek care and 16% would delay seeking care if unable to see a physician immediately. The most important pieces of information desired were providers’ philosophies of care, certifications, areas of specialization and length of time practising medicine. As students perceived greater similarities due to more personal information provided in the biographies, they viewed, uncertainty was reduced leading to higher levels of anticipated patient satisfaction and quality of care. Conclusions: USA college students need greater levels of education regarding the care that can be received from a variety of healthcare professionals. Information provided should also include more personal information about the providers to help reduce students’ uncertainty and to enable students to access services that are person-centered in their nature.

scholarly journals INNV-29. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE MODEL FOR ADVANCED PRACTITIONERS IN NEURO ONCOLOGY

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii122-ii123
Author(s):  
Christina Cone ◽  
Mary Affronti
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Professional Practice ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Professional Competencies ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Study Results

Abstract BACKGROUND Neuro-oncology advanced practitioners (APs - nurse practitioners, physician assistants) require specialization beyond the scope of population-based generalist training and education. There are no specialty standards or certifications for neuro-oncology APs, no formal training programs, and no literature that addresses the competency requirements of neuro-oncology APs. The burden of AP turnover at an academic medical center ambulatory neuro-oncology practice was as high as 50%. This quality improvement project’s purpose was to develop a professional practice model (PPM) to support the professional development and retention of APs. METHODS Using the Focus, Analyze, Develop, Execute and Evaluate (FADE) quality improvement methodology the authors (1) reviewed literature and relevant professional organizations to identify possible professional competencies for neuro-oncology APs, (2) analyzed data to develop evidenced-based practice domains, (3) used purposive sampling to recruit a team of neuro-oncology experts, (4) conducted a Delphi study with the experts to gain consensus on practice domains and professional competencies, and finally (5) utilized the Delphi study results to create a PPM for neuro-oncology APs. RESULTS The authors recruited twenty-three participants (39% were physicians, 57% were APs, and 4% were administrators) for the Delphi study, which was executed via electronic transmission using Qualtrics. Participants reached consensus on six domains of practice (Medical Knowledge, Interprofessional Collaboration/Communication, System-based Practice, Professionalism, Practice-based learning, Patient/family-centered care) and fifty corresponding competency statements after two rounds of the Delphi. With the implementation of the PPM and the development of standardized onboarding, the AP turnover rate decreased from 50% to 12% in just two years. CONCLUSION This QI project successfully created a PPM for a neuro-oncology AP team. The PPM supports neuro-oncology APs by validating their unique skill set that combines several specialties. The PPM provided the framework to standardize orientation/training, evaluate performance, and promote job satisfaction and retention.

A chemotherapy privileging process for advanced practice providers at an academic medical center

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-123
Author(s):  
Michelle A Carrasquillo ◽  
Tyler A Vest ◽  
Jill S Bates ◽  
Aimee Faso ◽  
Jessica Auten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Oncology Practice

Purpose Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists are advanced practice providers who are highly trained and qualified healthcare professionals that can help support traditional demands on oncologists' increased time in direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to detail and assess the creation of a privileging process for this group of medical professionals within an academic medical center. Obtaining the designation of limited oncology practice provider (LOPP) gives the right to modify chemotherapy orders and to order supportive care medications. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed a comprehensive training process inclusive of required educational domains, knowledge goals, and educational activities to become an LOPP. In 2018, five years after the implementation of the privileging process, a survey was distributed to assess perceptions of the training process and integration of LOPPs within oncology practice. Results Most oncologists noted that working with LOPPs is beneficial to oncology practice (94%) and that they make modifying chemotherapy orders more efficient (87%). Greater than 82% of LOPPs also reported that their privileges streamline the chemotherapy process and make them feel valuable. Conclusion The creation of the LOPP designation is an effective way to integrate nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists within oncology practice. The inclusion of a focused privileging process ensures the safety of cancer care provided and has created a streamlined process for chemotherapy modifications and supportive care.

What does 'palliative care' mean? Diverse definitions from cancer care providers.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 40-40
Author(s):  
Erin E. Kent ◽  
Rebecca A. Ferrer ◽  
Michelle Mollica ◽  
Grace Huang ◽  
Angela Falisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Nurses ◽  
Curative Care ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care

40 Background: Existing literature on the epistemology of palliative care has mostly centered on patient/family perspectives. Understanding how multi-disciplinary healthcare providers themselves define palliative care is a critical step towards addressing barriers and harnessing facilitators that affect optimal delivery. Methods: Semi-structured key informant interviews (N = 19) were conducted with members of healthcare provider teams as part of a qualitative study on goals of care for cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials. Purposive sampling included diverse roles: attending physicians/principal investigators, oncology fellows, physician assistants, research and clinical nurses, patient care coordinators, palliative care physicians, social workers, chaplains, and pharmacists. One probe asked participants, “What does palliative care mean to you in your work?” Responses were transcribed and independently coded by two raters using interview-derived deductive and emergent inductive codes. Themes were then identified and analyzed using NVivo. Results: Informants included different elements in their definitions: attributes of palliative care (“Palliative care is helpful”); structure (“We have a pain and palliative team”); patient outcomes “(comfort”), and relation to other services (“adjunct to necessary medical care”). Additional themes also included (1) the charge of palliative care to alleviate suffering; (2) the recognition that palliative care should be holistic; (3) the centrality of symptom management, in particular pain; (4) the conflation of end-of-life, hospice, and palliative care; (5) tensions between palliative and curative care. Provider role and specific team membership appear to influence perspectives on definitions of palliative care. Conclusions: Providers share a wide range of perspectives on the operationalization of palliative care in their work. In addition to soliciting input from patients and family members, the viewpoints of a diverse set of providers should be ascertained often to inform models of care, alleviate tensions between palliative and curative care provider teams, and increase optimal usage of palliative care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document