Tracking H1N1 vaccine doses administered using CDC’s Countermeasure and Response Administration system

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Tom T. Shimabukuro, MD, MPH, MBA ◽  
Sanjeeb Sapkota, MBBS, MPH ◽  
Barbara L. Nichols, BS ◽  
Warren G. Williams, MPH ◽  
Shirley W. Mullins, MIT, CSM ◽  
...  

During the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic, the Countermeasure and Response Administration (CRA) system, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) computer-based informatics application, monitored H1N1 vaccine uptake during the early stages of the US vaccination program, from October through the end of November 2009. CRA, which directly monitors vaccine doses administered, was developed to support the mass tracking of medical countermeasure use during public health events and to complement populationbased survey data on vaccination coverage during a pandemic influenza vaccination program. CRA provided weekly near real-time reports of H1N1 vaccine doses administered at national and state levels. On average, during any given week, 58.8 percent of the total data available to be reported was actually reported to CDC. During the 8-week mandatory reporting period, a cumulative total of 13,109,962 first-dose vaccine doses administered were reported through CRA, representing approximately 4.4 percent of the US population. Nearly 60 percent of these doses were administered to individuals aged 6 months to 24 years, an age interval that was included in the initial target groups prioritized to receive vaccine. CRA was a key component of the national surveillance system providing information on early uptake of H1N1 vaccine and monitoring program progress. These accomplishments indicate that CRA can effectively function as an immunization tool to monitor vaccine uptake during a pandemic.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siang I. Lee ◽  
Ei M. Aung ◽  
Ik S. Chin ◽  
Jeremy W. Hing ◽  
Sanghamitra Mummadi ◽  
...  

Background. Pandemic influenza vaccination rate amongst healthcare workers in England 2009/2010 was suboptimal (40.3%). Targeting medical students before they enter the healthcare workforce is an attractive future option. This study assessed the H1N1 vaccine uptake rate amongst medical students and factors that influenced this. Methods. Anonymised, self-administered questionnaire at a medical school. Results. The uptake rate amongst 126 medical students offered the vaccine was 49.2% and intended uptake amongst 77 students was 63.6%. Amongst those offered the vaccine, the strongest barriers to acceptance were fear of side effects (67.9%), lack of vaccine information (50.9%), lack of perceived risk (45.3%), and inconvenience (35.8%). Having a chronic illness (OR 3.4 (95% CI 1.2–10.2)), 4th/5th year of study (OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.3–7.1)), and correct H1N1 knowledge (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.1–6.0)) were positively associated with uptake. Non-white ethnicity was an independent negative predictor of uptake (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.8)). Students who accepted the H1N1 vaccine were three times more likely (OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.2–7.7)) to accept future seasonal influenza vaccination. Conclusion. Efforts to increase uptake should focus on routine introduction of influenza vaccine and creating a culture of uptake during medical school years, evidence-based education on vaccination, and improving vaccine delivery.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e41837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Verger ◽  
Rémi Flicoteaux ◽  
Michael Schwarzinger ◽  
Luis Sagaon-Teyssier ◽  
Patrick Peretti-Watel ◽  
...  

Vaccine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (46) ◽  
pp. 6918-6925
Author(s):  
Ho Vinh Thang ◽  
Vu Minh Huong ◽  
John C. Victor ◽  
Cao Bao Van ◽  
Nguyen Tuyet Nga ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A631.2-A631
Author(s):  
L. L. Prado ◽  
C. G. S. Saad ◽  
J. C. B. Moraes ◽  
A. C. M. Ribeiro ◽  
N. E. Aikawa ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-771-S-772
Author(s):  
Iris Dotan ◽  
Hilda Shaharabani ◽  
Revital Kariv ◽  
Elisa Tiomny ◽  
Jorge Pfeffer ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Brakemeier ◽  
B. Schweiger ◽  
N. Lachmann ◽  
P. Glander ◽  
C. Schonemann ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e16496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darius Soonawala ◽  
Guus F. Rimmelzwaan ◽  
Luc B. S. Gelinck ◽  
Leo G. Visser ◽  
Frank P. Kroon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document