‘She can see how much I actually do!’ Talking Mats®: helping people with dementia and family carers to discuss managing daily living

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey Oliver ◽  
Joan Murphy ◽  
Sylvia Cox
Keyword(s):  
Daily Living ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
People With Dementia

scholarly journals Community Occupational Therapy for people with dementia and family carers (COTiD-UK) versus treatment as usual (Valuing Active Life in Dementia [VALID]) study: A single-blind, randomised controlled trial

PLoS Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e1003433
Author(s):  
Jennifer Wenborn ◽  
Aidan G. O’Keeffe ◽  
Gail Mountain ◽  
Esme Moniz-Cook ◽  
Michael King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Therapy ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Sense Of Competence ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
The Family ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background We aimed to estimate the clinical effectiveness of Community Occupational Therapy for people with dementia and family carers–UK version (Community Occupational Therapy in Dementia–UK version [COTiD-UK]) relative to treatment as usual (TAU). We hypothesised that COTiD-UK would improve the ability of people with dementia to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and family carers’ sense of competence, compared with TAU. Methods and findings The study design was a multicentre, 2-arm, parallel-group, assessor-masked, individually randomised controlled trial (RCT) with internal pilot. It was conducted in 15 sites across England from September 2014 to January 2018. People with a diagnosis of mild to moderate dementia living in their own home were recruited in pairs with a family carer who provided domestic or personal support for at least 4 hours per week. Pairs were randomised to either receive COTiD-UK, which comprised 10 hours of occupational therapy delivered over 10 weeks in the person with dementia’s home or TAU, which comprised the usual local service provision that may or may not include standard occupational therapy. The primary outcome was the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale (BADLS) score at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes for the person with dementia included the following: the BADLS scores at 52 and 78 weeks, cognition, quality of life, and mood; and for the family carer: sense of competence and mood; plus the number of social contacts and leisure activities for both partners. Participants were analysed by treatment allocated. A total of 468 pairs were recruited: people with dementia ranged from 55 to 97 years with a mean age of 78.6 and family carers ranged from 29 to 94 with a mean of 69.1 years. Of the people with dementia, 74.8% were married and 19.2% lived alone. Of the family carers, 72.6% were spouses, and 22.2% were adult children. On randomisation, 249 pairs were assigned to COTiD-UK (62% people with dementia and 23% carers were male) and 219 to TAU (52% people with dementia and 32% carers were male). At the 26 weeks follow-up, data were available for 364 pairs (77.8%). The BADLS score at 26 weeks did not differ significantly between groups (adjusted mean difference estimate 0.35, 95% CI −0.81 to 1.51; p = 0.55). Secondary outcomes did not differ between the groups. In total, 91% of the activity-based goals set by the pairs taking part in the COTiD-UK intervention were fully or partially achieved by the final COTiD-UK session. Study limitations include the following: Intervention fidelity was moderate but varied across and within sites, and the reliance on primarily proxy data focused on measuring the level of functional or cognitive impairment which may not truly reflect the actual performance and views of the person living with dementia. Conclusions Providing community occupational therapy as delivered in this study did not improve ADL performance, cognition, quality of life, or mood in people with dementia nor sense of competence or mood in family carers. Future research should consider measuring person-centred outcomes that are more meaningful and closely aligned to participants’ priorities, such as goal achievement or the quantity and quality of activity engagement and participation. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10748953.

scholarly journals The Experience of Apathy in Dementia: A Qualitative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3325
Author(s):  
Waqaar Baber ◽  
Chern Yi Marybeth Chang ◽  
Jennifer Yates ◽  
Tom Dening
Keyword(s):  
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Effective Interventions ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Active Phenomenon

We aimed to explore and gain an understanding into how people with dementia experience apathy, and consequently suggest effective interventions to help them and their carers. Twelve participants (6 dyads of 6 people with dementia and their family carers) were recruited from “memory cafes” (meeting groups for people with dementia and their families), social groups, seminars, and patient and public involvement (PPI) meetings. People with dementia and their carers were interviewed separately and simultaneously. Quantitative data were collected using validated scales for apathy, cognition, anxiety, and depression. The interviews were semi-structured, focusing on the subjective interpretation of apathy and impacts on behaviour, habits, hobbies, relationships, mood, and activities of daily living. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA), which generated codes and patterns that were collated into themes. Four major themes were identified, three of which highlighted the challenging aspects of apathy. One described the positive aspects of the individuals’ efforts to overcome apathy and remain connected with the world and people around them. This study is the first to illustrate the subjective experience of apathy in dementia, portraying it as a more complex and active phenomenon than previously assumed. Apathy and its effects warrant more attention from clinicians, researchers, and others involved in dementia care.

Cancer treatment decisions for people living with dementia: experiences of family carers

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp20X711545
Author(s):  
Catherine Hynes ◽  
Caroline Mitchell ◽  
Lynda Wyld
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Support Needs ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
People With Dementia

BackgroundDementia and cancer are both diseases associated with older age. The National Cancer Data Audit in England found that 4.4% of people diagnosed with cancer also had cognitive impairment. Decisions about cancer treatment can be very complex when someone already has dementia. Often someone’s closest relative may be asked to make decisions on their behalf. Little is known about the psychosocial impact that this has on carers, or what their support needs are during this time.AimTo explore the experiences of family carers who have been involved in making cancer treatment decisions on behalf of a relative with dementia, in particular identifying challenges and support needs.MethodThe authors are conducting semi-structured interviews with carers of people with dementia who have been involved in making decisions about cancer treatment on their behalf. Data is being thematically analysed using an inductive approach. Two researchers will independently verify themes.ResultsThe authors expect to have completed 14–18 interviews and will report their preliminary findings. Family carers experience many difficulties in the context of cancer and dementia, including lack of support when coping with the aftereffects of cancer treatment, lack of awareness among healthcare professionals regarding the authority granted by a lasting power of attorney and the anxiety created by feeling responsible for identifying cancer recurrence.ConclusionThis study will highlight that supporting someone with dementia through cancer treatment, and having to make decisions about it on their behalf, creates unique challenges for carers. Currently there is a significant lack of support for those facing this distressing experience.

How does carer management style influence the performance of activities of daily living in people with dementia?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julieta Camino ◽  
Naoko Kishita ◽  
Allan Bregola ◽  
Judy Rubinsztein ◽  
Mizanur Khondoker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Management Style ◽  
People With Dementia

scholarly journals Personality and Dementia: an Approach to Differential Profile of the Caregiver

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-94
Author(s):  
Elena de Andrés-Jiménez ◽  
Rosa Mª Limiñana-Gras ◽  
Encarna Fernández-Ros
Keyword(s):  
Relevant Information ◽  
Personality Profile ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Psychological Variables ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
The Family ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The One ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this study is to determine the existence of a characteristic personality profile of family carers of people with dementia. The correct knowledge and use of psychological variables which affect the carer, helps to promote appropriate actions to mitigate the impact of care and improve the carer’s quality of life and likewise the one of the person cared for. The study population consists of 69 family carers of people with dementia, members of various associations and care centers. The results allow us to identify a characteristic personality profile for these carers and it reveals a specific psychological working in this sample, although we cannot directly relate it with the tasks of caring for people with this disease, this profile gives us very relevant information to pay more attention to the needs of this group. Moreover, the analysis of personality styles depends on the sex of the family carer, showing, once again, that the woman is in a situation of most vulnerability.

scholarly journals Defining end of life in dementia: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110254
Author(s):  
Bria Browne ◽  
Nuriye Kupeli ◽  
Kirsten J Moore ◽  
Elizabeth L Sampson ◽  
Nathan Davies
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Functional Decline ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Single Measure ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Limiting Condition

Background: Dementia is a life-limiting condition that affects 50 million people globally. Existing definitions of end of life do not account for the uncertain trajectory of dementia. People living with dementia may live in the advanced stage for several years, or even die before they reach the advanced stage of dementia. Aim: To identify how end of life in people with dementia is measured and conceptualised, and to identify the factors that contribute towards identifying end of life in people with dementia. Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Data Sources: Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL, were searched in April 2020. Eligible studies included adults with any dementia diagnosis, family carers and healthcare professionals caring for people with dementia and a definition for end of life in dementia. Results: Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. Various cut-off scores from validated tools, estimated prognoses and descriptive definitions were used to define end of life. Most studies used single measure tools which focused on cognition or function. There was no pattern across care settings in how end of life was defined. Healthcare professionals and family carers had difficulty recognising when people with dementia were approaching the end of life. Conclusion: End-of-life care and research that focuses only on cognitive and functional decline may fail to recognise the complexities and unmet needs relevant to dementia and end of life. Research and clinical practice should adopt a needs-based approach for people with dementia and not define end of life by stage of disease.

scholarly journals 409 - Trends in Involvement, Perceived Role, Role Overload and Self-efficacy of Family Carers of People with Dementia in Care Homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (S1) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Marleen Prins ◽  
Bernadette Willemse ◽  
Marlous Tuithof ◽  
Henriëtte van der Roest ◽  
Anne Margriet Pot
Keyword(s):  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Role Overload ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Change Over Time ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Over Time

IntroductionThe quality of long-term care provided to people with dementia (PwD) in care homes can be improved by implementing person-centered care. Family carers of PwD living in care homes are an important part of person-centered care. However, they often experience high levels of burden, even when a family member with dementia lives in a care home. This study examines trends in the involvement of family carers and their perceived role, role overload and self-efficacy.MethodsData from the Living Arrangements for People with Dementia study, a cross-sectional monitoring study that evaluates developments in care for PwD in care homes in the Netherlands, with four measurement cycles between 2008-2017 was used. Data from the three most current measurement cycles were used, with respectively 144, 47 and 49 participating care homes and 888, 392 and 401 participating family carers. Family involvement was measured by the number of hours per week that family carers visited the PwD and the type of activities they undertook. Perceived caregiving role was measured with the Family Perceptions of Caregiving Role instrument. We used the Self-Perceived Pressure by Informal Care to measure role overload and a 37-item questionnaire was used to measure self-efficacy. We investigated the changes over time (e.g., measurement cycles) of these measures.ResultsThe number of hours that family carers visited the PwD did not change over time. However, there was a trend towards an increase in the variety of activities they undertook. Their perceived caregiving role did not change over time. Self-efficacy of family carers increased over time and they reported more feelings of role overload.ConclusionsDuring the past decade, there has been an increasing trend towards family carers doing more diverse activities with PwD in carer homes. Family carers did feel more competent in their caring role, although their feelings of role overload also increased. Continuing attention is therefore needed for the psychological well-being of family carers after a person with dementia moves to a care home.

scholarly journals Effectiveness–implementation hybrid type 2 study evaluating an intervention to support ‘information work’ in dementia care: an implementation study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e038397
Author(s):  
Chiara De Poli ◽  
Jan R Oyebode ◽  
Christopher Binns ◽  
Richard Glover ◽  
Mara Airoldi
Keyword(s):  
Service Providers ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Theory Of Change ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Long Term Conditions ◽  
Local Service ◽  
Hybrid Type ◽  
North East ◽  
People With Dementia

IntroductionPatients with long-term conditions consistently report a lack of information around services and support available to them. This unmet need for information is significant among people with dementia and family carers. A quality improvement intervention is being carried out to tackle this issue as part of a co-creation initiative in the North East of England (UK). The intervention consists of the dissemination (via the local Community Mental Health Services for Older People) of a leaflet about services available to people with dementia and their family carers in the study site. This protocol is reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies.Methods and analysisThis effectiveness–implementation hybrid type 2 study aims at understanding (1) the unfolding and outcomes of the implementation strategy, (2) the outcomes of the intervention (for people with dementia and family carers, staff implementing the intervention and local service providers) and (3) the contribution of co-creation to the design and implementation of the intervention and its outcomes. The prospective theory of change of the intervention articulated by local stakeholders is used as a reference framework against which to assess the implementation and outcomes of the intervention. Evaluation data will be collected through in-depth interviews with people with dementia and family carers receiving the intervention, staff implementing the intervention and managers from local service providers. Referral data from local service providers will be collected to triangulate the interview data. A focus group with key stakeholders will support the sense-making of findings. The realist configuration of mechanism–context–outcome, operationalised using an information behaviour model, will inform data analysis and interpretation.Ethics and disseminationEthical and research governance approvals have been obtained from the West Midlands—South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee. The results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated through conferences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document