Measuring Learning In The Affective Domain Using Reflective Writing About A Virtual International Agriculture Experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 24-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry L. Boyd ◽  
Kim E. Dooley ◽  
Summer Felton
Keyword(s):  
Affective Domain ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
International Agriculture

UPAYA PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR PASING BAWAH BOLA VOLI DENGAN PENDEKATAN BERMAIN PADA SISWA KELAS X MAN DEMAK

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-55
Author(s):  
Indrianto Arif Ramadhana ◽  
Jeff Agung Perdana
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Action Observation ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Affective Domain ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Normalized Gain ◽  
Improve Student Learning ◽  
Planning Action

Forearm pass is one of the materials that must be mastered by students of class X Senior High School. In fact, many students do not yet master and know forearm pass techniques. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) with two cycles. Each cycle consists of 4 stages, namely: planning, action, observation and reflection. Data collection was carried out using observations and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using Hake's Normalized Gain formula. From the results of the study it is known that the psychomotor domain of students increased by 0.42 with average criteria from cycle 1 to cycle 2. The affective domain increased by 0.37 with average criteria. The cognitive domain increased by 0.39 with average criteria. Based on the results of the data analysis, it can be concluded that learning forearm pass techniques with games method can improve student learning outcomes.

Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Domain Afektif

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-109
Author(s):  
Rohmad Qomari
Keyword(s):  
Instrument Development ◽  
Affective Domain ◽  
Specific Aspect ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Test Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Reliable Instrument ◽  
Alternative Test ◽  
Psychomotor Domain

To carry out evaluation comprehensively, we need appropriate instrument that suitable with domain that being evaluated. Evaluation instrument development with test has been conducted by experts. These instruments were only suitable to measure cognitive domain and part of psychomotor domain. To measure affective domain, we need to develop non-test evaluation instrument (alternative test). The development of this instrument tends to more difficult and complicated compare with instrument test evaluation instrument. Therefore, it does necessitate a through study to derive and elaborate affective domain to specific aspect to develop valid and reliable instrument.

The impact of reflective writing paper on non-English major learners’ autonomy in the context of Vietnam

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 104-128
Author(s):  
Phan Thi Tuyet Van
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Research Results ◽  
English Major ◽  
Study Process ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Process Journal

The article aims to investigate the impact of the reflective writing paper on non- English major learners’ learning autonomy in a Vietnamese context. The data was collected by means of questionnaire, competence tests and interviews. The participants did two reflective writing papers as an intervention during the research. The research results show the possibilities for teachers to modify their teaching methods through analysis of feedback from the subjects. The findings showed that most participants appreciated the role of the reflective writing paper and they were aware of the significance of learning autonomy in their study process. Journal of NELTA, Vol. 17 No. 1-2, December 2012, Page 104-128 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nelta.v17i1-2.8102

scholarly journals EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training: a EULAR School of Rheumatology initiative

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001684
Author(s):  
Marloes van Onna ◽  
Sofia Ramiro ◽  
Catherine Haines ◽  
Mette Holland-Fischer ◽  
Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Personal Development ◽  
Portfolio Assessment ◽  
Clinical Work ◽  
Multisource Feedback ◽  
Reflective Writing ◽  
Learning Goals ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Personal Reflections

ObjectiveAbout half of the rheumatology trainees do not use a portfolio. This project was established to reach consensus about the content of a EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and subsequently develop portfolio assessment forms.MethodsAfter establishing a portfolio working group (WG), including nine rheumatologists and one educationalist, a systematic literature review (SLR) on the content and structure of portfolios for postgraduate learning was conducted (November 2018). This was followed by a survey among WG members and members of the EMerging EUlar NETwork, inquiring about the content and structure of existing national portfolios. The portfolio WG selected the key components of the portfolio, taking previous experience and feasibility into account. Assessment forms (eg, case-based discussion) were developed and pilot-tested.Results13/2034 articles were included in the SLR (12 high/1 moderate risk of bias). Information on procedural skills, personal reflections, learning goals and multisource feedback was most often included a portfolio. Twenty-five respondents completed the survey (response≈50%). Feedback from assessors, reflective writing and formulation of learning goals were considered important dimensions to be covered in a portfolio. Six key components of the portfolio were established: curriculum vitae, personal development plan, clinical work, professional behaviours, education and research activities. Suggested minimal content for each component was formulated. Four assessment forms were successfully pilot-tested by 11 rheumatologists and their trainees.ConclusionA EULAR portfolio for Rheumatology training and assessment forms were developed. Portfolio implementation, particularly in countries without an existing portfolio, may promote a higher standard of rheumatology training across Europe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document