Assessment of a roughing filtration as a pre-treatment for slow sand filtration of canal water with highly variable feed water turbidity

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 221-227
Author(s):  
Mohammad Yassin ◽  
Nidal Mahmoud ◽  
Kebreab Ghebremichael ◽  
Branislav Petrusevski
Keyword(s):  
Feed Water ◽  
Sand Filtration ◽  
Canal Water ◽  
Water Turbidity ◽  
Slow Sand Filtration ◽  
Pre Treatment

Treatment of Groundwater with Slow Sand Filtration

1988 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hatva
Keyword(s):  
Biological Activities ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Purification Process ◽  
Sand Filtration ◽  
Sand Filters ◽  
Slow Sand Filtration ◽  
Filtration Method ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Full Scale Tests ◽  
Iron Manganese

The purification process and techniques of the slow sand filtration method for treatment of groundwater was studied on the basis of pilot plant and full scale tests and studies of waterworks, to obtain guidelines for construction and maintenance. The purification process consists in general of two principal phases which are pre-treatment and slow sand filtration. Both are biological filters. The main purpose of the pre-treatment is to reduce the iron content of raw water, in order to slow down the clogging of the slow sand filters. Different types of biofilters have proved very effective in the pre-treatment phase, with reduction of total iron from 50 % to over 80 %. During the treatment, the oxidation reduction conditions gradually change becoming suitable for chemical and biological precipitation of iron, manganese and for oxidation of ammonium. Suitable environmental conditions are crucial in the oxidation of manganese and ammonium which, according to these studies, mainly occurs in slow sand filters, at the end of the process. Low water temperature in winter does not seem to prevent the biological activities connected with the removal of iron, manganese and ammonium, the chief properties necessitating treatment of groundwater in Finland.

Chemically enhanced gravel pre-filtration for slow sand filters: advantages and pitfalls

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-128
Author(s):  
C.C. Dorea ◽  
B.A. Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Negative Impact ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Sand Filtration ◽  
Sand Filters ◽  
Slow Sand Filtration ◽  
Chemical Enhancement ◽  
Dissolved Organics ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Slow Sand Filter ◽  
Pre Treatment

The chemical enhancement of gravel (or roughing) filtration with coagulants, i.e. direct (gravel) filtration, has been proposed as a pre-treatment alternative for slow sand filters. However, studies have frequently focused on the efficiencies of the pre-filters in terms of reduction percentages. The effectiveness of the pre-treatment on the subsequent slow sand filtration is not usually cited or even evaluated. By incorporating a pilot-scale slow sand filter in our trials, both aspects of the pre-treatment process were assessed: efficiency and effectiveness. In terms of turbidity reductions, our results demonstrated that chemically enhanced pre-filtration was substantially more efficient (93.2 to 99.5%) than conventional pre-filtration (50.6 to 79.3); this was also observed in terms of reductions in the level of other parameters (i.e. thermotolerant faecal coliforms and dissolved organics). Yet, the use of a coagulant can have a negative impact on the slow sand filtration run.

Effect of slow sand filtration of treated wastewater as pre-treatment to UF

Desalination ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 249 (2) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Zheng ◽  
R. Mehrez ◽  
M. Jekel ◽  
M. Ernst
Keyword(s):  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
Sand Filtration ◽  
Slow Sand Filtration ◽  
Pre Treatment

scholarly journals Applying the coagulation and reverse osmosis for water recovery from evaporative water

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-300
Author(s):  
Magdalena M. Michel ◽  
Lidia Reczek ◽  
Tadeusz Siwiec ◽  
Piotr Rudnicki
Keyword(s):  
Reverse Osmosis ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Membrane Filtration ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Feed Water ◽  
Water Recovery ◽  
Evaporative Water ◽  
Water Turbidity ◽  
A Value ◽  
Pre Treatment

Abstract Applying the coagulation and reverse osmosis for water recovery from evaporative water. Evaporative water from the concentration of yeast slurry is a potential raw material for water recovery. It is characterized by low pH (4.6-6.3), increased turbidity (3.65-13.7 NTU), and high content of total organic carbon (356-754 mg/L). Its treatment in the volume coagulation process using NaOH and coagulant PIX 111, was studied. Water turbidity was lowered to a value below 1 NTU, but coagulation did not allow for the removal of organic compounds. Coagulation was effective at temperatures of 20 and 40°C. Pretreatment of the feed water for RO included alkalization, coagulation, sedimentation, and 5 μm fine filtration (variant I), as well as single 5 μm fine filtration (variant II as a blank). In variant I the feed with improved properties was achieved. Membrane filtration allowed for effective desalination of evaporative water, 98 and 73% conductivity retention was obtained, depending on the method of the feed pre-treatment. The organic compounds were removed less efficiently, at 94 and 84%, respectively.

scholarly journals Measuring Biofouling Potential in SWRO Plants with a Flow-Cytometry-Based Bacterial Growth Potential Method

Membranes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Nirajan Dhakal ◽  
Sergio G. Salinas-Rodriguez ◽  
Joshua Ampah ◽  
Jan C. Schippers ◽  
Maria D. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Bacterial Growth ◽  
Potential Method ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Feed Water ◽  
Dissolved Air Flotation ◽  
Ultra Filtration ◽  
Pre Treatment

Measuring the bacterial growth potential of seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) feed water is an issue that is receiving growing attention. This study developed and demonstrated the applicability of the flow-cytometry (FCM)-based bacterial growth potential (BGP) method to assess the biofouling potential in SWRO systems using natural microbial consortium. This method is relatively fast (2–3 days) compared to conventional bioassays. The effect of the potential introduction of nutrients during measurement has been studied thoroughly to achieve the lowest measure value of about 45,000 cells/mL, which is equivalent to about (10 µg-C glucose/L). The BGP method was applied in two full-scale SWRO plants that included (i) dissolved air flotation (DAF) and ultra-filtration (UF); (ii) dual-media filtration (DMF) and cartridge filter (CF), which were compared with the cleaning frequency of the plants. A significant reduction (54%) in BGP was observed through DAF–UF as pre-treatment (with 0.5 mg Fe3+/L), while there was a 40% reduction by DMF–CF (with 0.8 mg Fe3+/L). In terms of the absolute number, the SWRO feed water after DAF–UF supports 1.5 × 106 cells/mL, which is 1.25 times higher than after DMF–CF. This corresponds to the higher cleaning-in-place (CIP) frequency of SWRO with DAF–UF compared to DMF–CF as pre-treatment, indicating that the BGP method has an added value in monitoring the biofouling potential in SWRO systems.

scholarly journals Natural organic matter removal by ion exchange at different positions in the drinking water treatment lane

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grefte ◽  
M. Dignum ◽  
E. R. Cornelissen ◽  
L. C. Rietveld
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
Organic Matter ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Natural Organic Matter ◽  
Drinking Water Treatment ◽  
Biological Stability ◽  
Sand Filtration ◽  
Slow Sand Filtration

Abstract. To guarantee a good water quality at the customers tap, natural organic matter (NOM) should be (partly) removed during drinking water treatment. The objective of this research was to improve the biological stability of the produced water by incorporating anion exchange (IEX) for NOM removal. Different placement positions of IEX in the treatment lane (IEX positioned before coagulation, before ozonation or after slow sand filtration) and two IEX configurations (MIEX® and fluidized IEX (FIX)) were compared on water quality as well as costs. For this purpose the pre-treatment plant at Loenderveen and production plant Weesperkarspel of Waternet were used as a case study. Both, MIEX® and FIX were able to remove NOM (mainly the HS fraction) to a high extent. NOM removal can be done efficiently before ozonation and after slow sand filtration. The biological stability, in terms of assimilable organic carbon, biofilm formation rate and dissolved organic carbon, was improved by incorporating IEX for NOM removal. The operational costs were assumed to be directly dependent of the NOM removal rate and determined the difference between the IEX positions. The total costs for IEX for the three positions were approximately equal (0.0631 € m−3), however the savings on following treatment processes caused a cost reduction for the IEX positions before coagulation and before ozonation compared to IEX positioned after slow sand filtration. IEX positioned before ozonation was most cost effective and improved the biological stability of the treated water.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document