scholarly journals Advanced stages of classical Hodgkin lymphoma – first-line treatment options

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Móciková
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
First Line Treatment

Clinicopathological Features of Nodular Sclerosis-Type Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma In the Elderly: Multicenter Study of Hodgkin Lymphoma In Japan

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2677-2677
Author(s):  
Naoko Asano ◽  
Tomohiro Kinoshita ◽  
Koichi Ohshima ◽  
Tadashi Yoshino ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Clinicopathological Features ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Abstract 2677 Background: Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), which is characterized by the presence of Hodgkin and Reed Sternberg (H-RS) cells in a background of non-neoplastic inflammatory cells, is divided into four histological subgroups, nodular sclerosis (NSCHL), mixed cellularity (MCCHL), lymphocyte-rich, and lymphocyte depletion. While NSCHL in young adults is characterized by a mediastinal mass and good prognosis, the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCHL in the elderly (NSCHL-e) remain uncertain. Patients and methods: Enrolled patients were diagnosed with CHL between 1986 and 2006 as part of the Hodgkin Lymphoma's Multicenter Study Group. To better characterize NSCHL-e, we compared the clinicopathological profiles of 84 NSCHL-e patients aged 50 or over with 237 NSCHL-y patients aged 49 or younger and 302 with MCCHL. Results: The total of 743 CHL patients consisted of 496 men and 247 women with a median age of 48 years (range, 15– 89 years). The pathological diagnoses were NSCHL in 324 patients (43%) and MCCHL in 303 (41%). NSCHL patients showed a bimodal age distribution, with an initial peak in their 20s and a second small peak in their 60s. We categorized the former as NSCHL-y (49 or younger) and the latter as NSCHL-e (50 and over). NSCHL-e patients were characterized by male predominance and a more advanced clinical stage (53%) than NSCHL-y. Immunophenotypically, H-RS cells had the prototypic immunophenotype of CD15+ CD30+ and Pax5+. NSCHL-e cases showed a significantly higher rate of CD20 (24%) than NSCHL-y (8%, P = 0.001). Furthermore, H-RS cells in 29 of 75 (39%) patients with NSCHL-e were positive for EBV RNA transcripts by in situ hybridization, whereas only 7% of NSCHL-y cases were EBER-positive (P < 0.0001) (Table). Regarding NSCHL-e and MCCHL, no significant difference between these patients was seen in clinical characteristics. Immunophenotypically, NSCHL-e patients showed significantly higher rates for CD3 and TIA-1, while MCCHL patients showed higher EBV positivity (75%). Fifty-five of 63 patients received systemic multi-agent chemotherapy as first-line treatment, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacin (ABVD) in 38 patients; CHOP in 8; C-MOPP in 8; and BEACOPP in 1. Overall, 51 patients responded to first-line treatment, 39 with complete response and 12 with partial response. Disease-specific survival of NSCHL-e was poorer than that of NSCHL-y (P < 0.001) but similar to that of MCCHL (P = 0.43) (Figure). Conclusion: NSCHL-e is characterized by an unfavorable prognosis and different clinicopathological features to NSCHL-y, which is considered as typical NSCHL. A number of cases of NSCHL-e might have been associated with MCCHL, with most being EBV-positive. These results suggest the limitations of current histological subgroupings for CHL. Disclosures: Matsushita: Pfizer CO.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Baxter Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Patient and Physician Preferences for First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4786-4786
Author(s):  
Joseph Feliciano ◽  
Kerstin Mueller ◽  
Ellen E Korol ◽  
Zhouqin He ◽  
Niloufer Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
The United States ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: The standard of care for previously untreated classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in the United States has been combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) alone or with radiotherapy depending on clinical characteristics. Other treatment programs exist, including intensified chemotherapy regimens, and substitution of brentuximab vedotin for bleomycin recently received FDA approval as first-line therapy for advance stage HL. The objective of this study was to understand how specific treatment attributes impact preferences among patients and physicians for choice of first-line treatment of HL. Methods: An online survey including a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was administered both to oncologists who manage patients with HL and to patients diagnosed within HL within the last two years in the United States. Participants were identified via online research panels. The attributes and levels of the hypothetical treatments presented in the DCE were informed by targeted literature review and physician and patient interviews. For physicians, six attributes were included: two-year overall survival (OS); two-year progression free survival (PFS); risk of side effects requiring hospitalization; risk of peripheral neuropathy (PN); risk of pulmonary toxicity; and patient out-of-pocket cost. The patient DCE included four attributes: OS, PFS, risk of PN and risk of pulmonary toxicity. DCE scenarios were developed using a d-efficient design. Participants reviewed 10 scenarios, and selected their preference between two hypothetical treatments. Patients considered themselves when selecting their preference; physicians considered four different advanced HL patient profiles that differed in age (30 or 65 years), smoking status, and the presence of baseline PN. The DCE data were analyzed using a mixed logit model (MXL). The relative importance of each attribute was calculated by determining the differences between the maximum and minimum coefficients of each attribute. These were then normalized and presented as percentages. Results: A total of 200 physicians and 141 patients were included in the analysis. Physicians had a mean of 15 years' experience and 71% practiced in a community setting. Patients had a median age of 35 years (range 19 to 69), 60% were male, and 34% were diagnosed with advanced stage HL. In the DCE, the most important attributes to both patients and physicians were OS and PFS. Based on the coefficients from the MXL model, a 1% increase in OS was more important to both groups than a 1% increase in PFS. The coefficients and level ranges for each attribute were used to calculate preference weights (see methods). Based on preference weights, PFS was the most important attribute for patients, followed by OS, risk of pulmonary toxicity, and risk of PN (Table 1). Compared to male patients, there was a trend for female patients to have a lower preference for a 1% decrease in risk of progression (p=0.077). Patients above the median age of 35 years had a significant preference (p=0.048) for a lower risk of pulmonary toxicity, and a trend for a higher preference for a 1% increase in OS (p=0.059) was observed. OS was also marginally more important to patients diagnosed with advanced stage HL versus those diagnosed in earlier stages. For physicians, preferences for treatment attributes differed based on the patient profile presented. PFS outweighed OS for a healthy 35 year-old patient (Table 2), whereas OS had a higher relative preference weight for a 35 year old smoker and older patients. For smokers, physicians ranked pulmonary toxicity as the most important attribute. Among older patients, side effects requiring hospitalization were more important to physicians' preferences than both OS and PFS. There were no major differences in preferences between academic and community oncologists. Conclusion: Patients are willing to accept treatments with worse short and long-term side effects in exchange for improved OS or PFS. Physicians' treatment preferences are patient-specific, with age and comorbidities impacting both the relative weight of OS and PFS attributes and the importance of pulmonary toxicity and short-term side effects. These results underscore the importance of assessing and sharing patient and physician preferences in creating a treatment plan for the management of newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures Feliciano: Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mueller:ICON plc: Employment. Korol:ICON plc: Employment. He:ICON plc: Employment. Matasar:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients With Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated in the HD7 to HD15 Trials: A Report From the German Hodgkin Study Group

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 698-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Eichenauer ◽  
Annette Plütschow ◽  
Michael Fuchs ◽  
Stephanie Sasse ◽  
Christian Baues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Early Stages ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE The optimal treatment of newly diagnosed nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is ill defined. We therefore conducted a retrospective analysis using the database of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). PATIENTS AND METHODS The long-term course of 471 patients with NLPHL (early stages, n = 251; intermediate stages, n = 76; advanced stages, n = 144) who had received stage-adapted first-line treatment in the randomized GHSG HD7 to HD15 studies was investigated. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy alone, chemotherapy alone, or combined-modality approaches. RESULTS The median age at NLPHL diagnosis was 39 years (range, 16 to 75 years). Patients were mostly male (75.8%). The median observation time was 9.2 years. At 10 years, progression-free survival and overall survival estimates were 75.5% and 92.1% (early stages, 79.7% and 93.3%; intermediate stages, 72.1% and 96.2%; advanced stages, 69.8% and 87.4%), respectively. A total of 48 patients (10.2%) developed a second malignancy during follow-up (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, n = 13; leukemia, n = 6; solid tumor, n = 25; unspecified malignancy, n = 4). Death occurred in 43 patients (9.1%). However, only a minority of deaths were NLPHL related (n = 10), whereas second malignancies (n = 20) and nonmalignant conditions possibly associated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy (n = 13) caused the death in the majority of patients. CONCLUSION The overall outcome of patients with NLPHL who had received Hodgkin lymphoma–directed first-line treatment in randomized GHSG trial protocols was good. Nonetheless, treatment optimization is still necessary to reduce toxicity in standard-risk patients and to improve the prognosis in high-risk patients.

Ability of final PET/CT to predict response to first-line treatment in real patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Galvez-Carvajal ◽  
Cristina Quero ◽  
María Casanova ◽  
Carola Díaz ◽  
Jose Reinaldo Chícharo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Real Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document