scholarly journals Protocol for a Pilot Study of the NODE Trial, a Prospective Multicentre Randomised Trial of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for High-Risk Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-353
Author(s):  
George McClintock ◽  
Hadia Khanani ◽  
Antonella De Rosa ◽  
Scott Leslie ◽  
Nariman Ahmadi ◽  
...  

Objectives To test the hypothesis that a randomised trial of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) can recruit at a rate acceptable for a larger scale trial. To compare the following secondary endpoints between the 2 arms: the rate of protocol violations, the intraoperative and postoperative morbidity of ePLND, and complications, and to evaluate short-term oncological outcomes comparing biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, and survival between arms. Patients and Methods A pilot study will be undertaken at Chris O’Brien Lifehouse and Royal Prince Alfred Hospitals for the NODE trial. Twenty patients will be randomised 1:1 to radical prostatectomy with or withoutePLND. Eligible participants will have high-risk prostate cancer and will be scheduled for robotic radical prostatectomy. High-risk disease will be defined as in the 2019 NCCN guidelines (stage ≥ T3a, ISUP Grade Group ≥ 4 or PSA ≥ 20ng/mL). PSMA PET/CT staging not showing any extraprostatic disease will be required. Quality control measures to ensure consistent delivery of high-quality extended lymph node dissections are in place,and surgeons have been selected for their consistent ability to perform such procedures. Results The trial is currently underway. Conclusion On current available evidence, it is unclear if ePLND provides additional benefit over radicalprostatectomy.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromichi Iwamura ◽  
Shingo Hatakeyama ◽  
Takuma Narita ◽  
Yusuke Ozaki ◽  
Sakae Konishi ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundWe aimed to determine the prognostic and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (<cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited-PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233).ResultsThe rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.31; P = 0.421).ConclusionsLimited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed a relatively low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document