scholarly journals Deferred Tax Accounting for SMEs: Modified Income Statement Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-47
Author(s):  
CA. (Dr.) Anand J Banka

Purpose: Accounting for income tax under International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) is dealt with in IAS 12 Income Taxes. It is often said that users of financial statements do not find information produced in accordance with IAS 12 useful. This is a serious problem because for many businesses tax is one of the largest expenses. In some cases, preparers find the requirements of IAS 12 difficult to apply in practice. Its requirements are said to be unclear, and preparers sometimes question the relevance and understandability of the information that is provided in accordance with the standard. The IFRS for SMEs currently require use of balance sheet approach for accounting of deferred taxes. In India, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) – the apex standard-setting body in India, is formulating revised accounting standards for SME’s in India. This article examines an alternative to the balance sheet approach which is less complicated and easy to implement.[Reviewer1] [AB2] Methodology: This article proposes a new method i.e. Modified Income Statement Approach. This method is a mix of income statement approach and balance sheet approach, as it requires recognition of deferred taxes using temporary difference approach but calculated using income statement and the other comprehensive income (in effect, Comprehensive income statement). Modified Income Statement Approach requires comparison of tax expense with the underlying related income and expenses so that they are recognized in the same period. In doing so, it also considers income and expenses recognized in the income statement as well as the Other Comprehensive Income. Hence, this approach is more of temporary difference approach but applied by using income statement method. It covers all items of timing differences and most items of temporary differences. The SMEs have less complicated structures and transactions. Also, in many countries, including India, there exists no concept of tax balance sheet. Hence, it would be worthwhile to ease-out the deferred tax accounting for SMEs. The hypothesis is that application of modified income statement approach can result in similar outcome as the balance sheet approach.Findings: A survey of 50 top companies in India was conducted. The results show that 60% of the companies would have recognized the same deferred tax asset/ liability under both the methods i.e. modified income statement approach and balance sheet approach. Balance 40% had some minor differences, but such transactions may be less frequent for SME. On an average, the impact of using modified income approach as against balance sheet approach is a mere 4%. The only items not covered by the modified income statement approach as against the balance sheet approach are Fair valuation of assets/ liabilities on business combination, Compound financial instrument and the existence of undistributed profits of subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint arrangements[Reviewer3] .[AB4] Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: [Reviewer5] [AB6] To balance out the cost and benefits of implementing an accounting standard as per the framework, it is critical that SME’s use a simpler and less complicated method which is easy to understand and implement. Modified income statement approach is easy to apply and not complicated or technical to understand. In India, companies are used to calculating deferred tax using income statement approach. Hence, this will be a small change from the existing approach, while achieving the objectives of the balance sheet approach. Hence, modified income statement approach seems to be an appropriate method for SMEs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-50
Author(s):  
A. A. Aksent’ev

Deferred taxes are an important object of accounting observation to judge the degree of discrepancies between financial and tax accounting. Meanwhile, the information discloses to users the effects arising from the tax planning tools usage for corporate management and forecasting cash outflows associated with the payment of income tax in the future. The paper formalized two concepts of accounting for deferred taxes in the form of models: temporary and timing differences associated with accounting ideologies. The author ha structured the logic of reflecting deferred taxes on accounting accounts using the balance sheet and “cost” methods. Analysis of foreign experience and domestic practice made it possible to conclude that there are controversial issues on the assessment of deferred taxes in reporting, including at present value. Also, the author revealed discrepancies in Russian Accounting Standard (PBU) 18/02 which were conceptually different from a similar international standard and conflicting with it in a number of theoretical and methodological positions. The research results are aimed at scientific and practical workers in the field of financial accounting, taxation and audit.


2021 ◽  
pp. 61-87
Author(s):  
Thomas Ryttersgaard

Although other comprehensive income did not exist in the conceptual framework until 2018, it has been a part of IFRS for many years, and it has not been defined based on accounting theory. This paper considers arguments for the current use of other comprehensive income under IFRS and finds that matching and prudence are at the core of other comprehensive income in IFRS despite not being elements of the conceptual framework. This suggests that the concept of other comprehensive income exists because the IFRS standards are founded on a mix of balance sheet-based and income statement-based accounting principles. Based on the characteristics of other comprehensive income and the IASB's arguments for the recognition of gains and losses in other comprehensive income, this paper proposes a definition of other comprehensive income that can be used to ensure a uniform application of the concept across accounting standards and to reduce risks of inconsistency.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 269
Author(s):  
Serhan Gürkan ◽  
Yasemin Köse

Other comprehensive income is the difference between net income as in the Income Statement and comprehensive income, and represents the certain gains and losses of the enterprise not recognized in the Profit or Loss Account. Value relevance of other comprehensive income is under discussion and considering other comprehensive income items all together might be misleading for financial performance. In the view of such information, discussing the value relevance of each other comprehensive income item, judgements are made.


2004 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Gordon ◽  
Peter R. Joos

We examine whether U.K. managers use the flexibility provided under the partial method for deferred taxes to measure unrecognized deferred taxes opportunistically. We first test whether firm-specific operational and opportunistic factors are associated with the level of unrecognized deferred taxes. The tests provide evidence certain U.K. managers opportunistically measure deferred taxes to manage leverage, consistent with arguments by commentators that deferred taxes heavily influence leverage indicators that play a prominent role in the U.K. contracting framework. Because the proper identification and measurement of both operational and opportunistic determinants of unrecognized deferred taxes influence our tests, we additionally investigate whether unrecognized taxes relate to future deferred tax reversals and future operating profitability of the firm. These tests show the components of deferred taxes predict both future deferred tax reversals and indicators of future profitability of the firm as predicted. Taken together, our results indicate that, on average, the existence of balance sheet management does not nullify the predictive power of (unrecognized) deferred taxes for future deferred tax reversals and for profitability measures. One implication of the results is that the recent U.K. standard change eliminating the partial provision method for deferred taxes potentially has reduced the usefulness of deferred tax disclosures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Akbar Abdi Negara ◽  
Luciana Spica Almilia Almilia

This study was induced by the change from SFAS 2009 to SFAS 2012. One of the changes contained in SFAS No. 1 states that comprehensive income statement is an additional component of other comprehensive income. The study aims to determine whether there are differences in the capital cost, earnings quality, and profitability be-tween companies that report comprehensive income statement and companies that do not report comprehensive income statement. The sample of the study consists of 120 manu-facturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2012. It uses Statistical test that is the Mann Whitney test due to the data, which were not normally distributed. The results of the research indicate that the significance level of capital cost variable is 0.038, earnings quality variable is 0.192, and profitability variable is 0.029. Therefore, it can be concluded that there are differences in the level of capital cost and profitability between companies that report comprehensive statements and companies that do not report comprehensive income statement. On the contrary, there is no differ-ence in the level of earnings quality between companies that report comprehensive in-come statement and companies that do not report comprehensive income statement.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Colley ◽  
Joseph Rue ◽  
Adrian Valencia ◽  
Ara Volkan

<p>This study examines the theory underlying the current accounting and reporting standards for deferred taxes. Given the goal of global accounting convergence and under the proposed condorsement approach, the FASB and the IASB have a historic opportunity to revise the existing deferred tax accounting standards. Thus, it is warranted to illustrate the financial consequences of using the proposed flow-through (where tax expense is equal to the statutory tax liability) approach versus the asset-liability method of accounting for deferred taxes. We achieve this objective by computing the change in the debt-to-equity (DTE) ratios for the 2004-2010 period when net deferred tax balances are eliminated and corresponding adjustments are made in the total liability and stockholders equity balances. Based on our observations, we propose that the underlying issue in accounting for deferred taxes is the unit problem and argue that deferred taxes do not represent assets and liabilities as defined by accounting standards.<strong></strong></p>


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Asy’ari Asy’ari ◽  
Nurmala Amhar ◽  
JMV Mulyadi

This study is done to present how the implementation other comprehensive income after the implementation of IFRS (Empirical Studies in Basic Industry and Chemicals listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2012-2015). Data collection techniques in this study is the population data that all companies engaged in chemical and basic industry sectors listed on the Stock Exchange resulting in 64 corporate data. Data required in this study were obtained from the Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD) and the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). Data analysis method used is the Cross Tabulation (Crosstab) and Cramer V with the help of the SPSS statistical data processing program. The study concluded that among the companies presenting and not presenting OCI component in the Income Statement Other Kompehensif, terdepat no significant difference. This may be explained in Prob Significance of 0.10% less than 0.05% Keywords: other comprehensive income, IFRS


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Marhaendra Kusuma

Purpose - The concept of recognizing all inclusive income, which is used by IFRS and Indonesian SAK, is the basis for presenting other comprehensive income in the income statement. This change in format became the idea of developing a financial performance measurement.Methodology - Testing the effect of attributable comprehensive income ROA and attributable ROA net income on future cash flows and net income, as a proxy for the ability to provide future returns, and applying them in measuring performance before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.Findings - ROA net income is better able to predict future investment returns. ROA comprehensive income has more relevance value, when only other items of comprehensive income that have the potential to be realized are included. In assessing performance, users are advised to keep using the ROA of the net income version, and when using the ROA of the comprehensive income version, it is advisable to include only OCI which will be reclassified. The financial performance of companies in many industrial sectors experienced a decline during the Covid 19 pandemic using two ROA measures.Novelty - Development of ROA formulation by including other comprehensive income and profit attribution, so far ROA is only based on net income.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (02) ◽  
pp. 258-273
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kurniawan

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was conducted to investigate how the implementation of the presentation of other comprehensive income after the implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standards. Research subjects are various industry sectors. Other comprehensive income components tested are foreign exchange differences, employee benefits, available financial instruments sold, hedges, asset revaluation, associations and venture. The research object is 42 company data of miscellaneous industry sector. The data analysis method used is cross-tabulation and test of Cramer-V difference. The results of the study conclude that the other components of comprehensive income that are presented differently in the research subjects are foreign exchange differences, available financial instruments for sale, hedging, asset revaluation and association. While the other comprehensive component of the presented income is no different is the employee benefits and joint venture. ABSTRAK Pujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menginvestigasi bagaimana implementasi penyajian other comprehensive income setelah penerapan International Financial Reporting Standars. Subyek penelitian adalah sector aneka industry. Komponen penghasilan komprehensif lain yang diuji adalah selisih kurs, imbalan kerja, instrument keuangan yang tersedia dijual, lindung nilai, revaluasi aset, asosiasi, dan ventura. Obyek penelitian adalah 42 data perusahaan perusahaan sector aneka industry. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah tabulasi silang dan uji beda Cramer-V. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa komponen penghasilan komprehensif lain yang tersaji berbeda pada subyek penelitian adalah selisih kurs, instrument keuangan yang tersedia dijual, hedging, revaluasi aset dan asosiasi. Sedangkan komponen penghasilan komprehensif lain yang tersaji tidak berbeda adalah imbalan kerja dan ventura bersama. JEL Classification: M41, M16, E42


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document