scholarly journals C1q nephropathy as a differential diagnosis of lupus nephritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Maria da Silva Bezerra ◽  
Tayana Evelling Uchôa da Silva ◽  
Bárbara Seabra Carneiro ◽  
Luiz Fernando Souza Passos
2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (13) ◽  
pp. 1731-1736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Yahata ◽  
Satoko Takahashi ◽  
Izaya Nakaya ◽  
Tsutomu Sakuma ◽  
Hiroshi Sato ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Guilherme Ribeiro Ramires de Jesus ◽  
Adriana Paulino Do Nascimento ◽  
Luís Cristóvão Porto ◽  
Nilson Ramires De Jesús ◽  
Roger A. Levy ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1420-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Sharman ◽  
P. Furness ◽  
J. Feehally

Lupus ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 1276-1280 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Heidenreich ◽  
G. Mayer ◽  
M. Herold ◽  
W. Klotz ◽  
K. Stempfl Al-Jazrawi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bruce Mackay

The broadest application of transmission electron microscopy (EM) in diagnostic medicine is the identification of tumors that cannot be classified by routine light microscopy. EM is useful in the evaluation of approximately 10% of human neoplasms, but the extent of its contribution varies considerably. It may provide a specific diagnosis that can not be reached by other means, but in contrast, the information obtained from ultrastructural study of some 10% of tumors does not significantly add to that available from light microscopy. Most cases fall somewhere between these two extremes: EM may correct a light microscopic diagnosis, or serve to narrow a differential diagnosis by excluding some of the possibilities considered by light microscopy. It is particularly important to correlate the EM findings with data from light microscopy, clinical examination, and other diagnostic procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document