COVID-19 amongst cancer patients: an experience from Oman

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 2563-2569
Author(s):  
Bassim Jaffar Al Bahrani ◽  
Itrat Mehdi ◽  
Faryal Ali Khamis ◽  
Abdulaziz Mohammed Al Farsi ◽  
Fatma Al Fahdi ◽  
...  

Introduction: The pandemic of coronavirus has no parallel in recent history. Human Life has completely transformed. There are no approved standard therapies. Patients with comorbidities, old age, immunocompromised, and cancer are at higher risk of complicated course and higher mortality. Patients and Methods: This study is an analysis of Cancer patients who got COVID-19 infection to assess the rate, demographics, laboratory data, and mortality. The data was compared, with normal non-cancer COVID-19 infected patients.  Results: The overall number of COVID-19 positive cancer patients was low (0.47%) compared to normal population (2.17%). The mortality in COVID-19 Positive cancer patients was 35.1% vs 1.03%. Diabetic, hypertensive and cardiac patients are more likely to get COVID-19.  Among Normal subjects, ratio of expatriate patients was higher.  Septicemia was more frequent in cancer patients. Non-cancerous patients were more commonly ventilated.  Leucocytosis, renal impairment, Hypocalcemia, high Troponin, high D-dimer, and high transaminases were seen more in non-cancerous patients. A high Lactate dehydrogenase was more common in cancer patients. The mortality from COVID-19 was higher in cancer patients 25% vs 15.7%. Around 72.8% cancer patients received active treatment with in past 4 weeks before COVID-19 infection. Discussion and Conclusions: There are very few reports of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients. The number of patients is small with limited information and capacity of the healthcare system. Oncologists should consider to tailor cancer clinical management. The cancer patients must practice social distancing, and seek early evaluation for symptoms suspicious for COVID-19, testing for virus and chest radiography. Contintuous...

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21656-e21656
Author(s):  
Ersin Ozaslan ◽  
Metin Ozkan ◽  
Irfan Cicin ◽  
Mustafa Benekli ◽  
Murat Kocer ◽  
...  

e21656 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the most important causes of death in cancer patients, with VTE risk being 4-7 times higher among these patients compared to normal population. TREBECA is an observational study on cancer outpatients with low risk VTE treated with LMWH. Methods: Patients were treated by medical oncologists in Turkey at 15 sites, where they were enrolled and followed-up for a period of 12 months. Each center used their own treatment protocol. Primary endpoints were efficacy and the time to a change inVTE status (dissolution of thrombosis). The doses of LMWHs have been calculated according to patients’ body weights based on the dosage scheme and administered subcutaneously once or twice daily. Results: Data for 250 patients who met the study inclusion criteria were examined and analyzed. Of the included patients; 239 patients (95.6%) completed their Day 15 visit, 176 (70.4%) completed their Month 3 visit, 130 (52.0%) completed their Month 6 visit, and 91 (36.4%) completed the entire study. The mean age of the patients was 60.2 ± 13.7, while 53.2% (n = 133) of the patients were women. Colorectal (21.2%), lung (16.8%) and breast (14.8%) cancers were the most common forms of cancer. One hundred thirty-three patients were treated with enoxaparin, 112 patients were treated with bemiparin and 5 patients were treated with tinzaparin. Bemiparin resulted thrombosis resolution in more patients than enoxaparin, during day 15, month 3 and month 6 visits (table 1; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The observation that bemiparin is more effective in resolution of thrombosis was noteworthy. Thrombosis could not be effectively treated within the first 15 days in a significant number of patients, but could effectively be treated in most patients by Month 3. We can conclude that a treatment of at least 3 months is appropriate for cancer patients, even among those who are at low risk for venous thromboembolism. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 634-634
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Shaw ◽  
Ranjeeta Mallick ◽  
Marc Carrier ◽  
Anton Ilich ◽  
Nigel S. Key ◽  
...  

Background: Ambulatory cancer patients initiating chemotherapy are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Khorana score (0 = low, 1-2 = intermediate, 3-6 = high) helps clinicians to stratify these patients according to their underlying risk of VTE. The CATS score, which incorporates additional points for elevated biomarkers (d-dimer, p-selectin), may enhance VTE risk stratification by adding up to two additional points to the Khorana score. We sought to evaluate the incidence of VTE in patients with a Khorana score of ≥ 2 and elevated biomarkers. Methods: The AVERT trial compared apixaban to placebo for the primary prevention of VTE in ambulatory cancer patients with a Khorana score of ≥ 2. D-dimer and p-selectin measurements were performed at randomization. Patients with d-dimer or p-selectin over the 75th percentile received 1 additional point each per elevated measurement (d-dimer ≥ 2.06 ug/mL and p-selectin ≥ 44.5 ng/mL). Cumulative 6-month VTE incidences according to Khorana and CATS scores were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. VTE was assessed among patients receiving placebo (control group) according to modified intention to treat analysis, whereas bleeding events were assessed among patients receiving apixaban according to per-protocol analysis. For both the Khorana and CATS scores, the highest risk groups were merged into pooled high-risk groups (Khorana ≥ 3, CATS ≥ 4) given the low number of patients in higher risk strata. Hazard ratios for VTE were calculated by univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses. The linear association between risk scores, VTE incidence and incidence of overall bleeding was tested for statistical significance. Results: A total of 466 patients were included in the analysis, 229 and 237 patients in the placebo and apixaban arms, respectively. There were 73 (31.9%) and 86 (36.3%) patients with Khorana scores ≥ 3 in the control and apixaban arms, respectively, whereas there were 52 (22.7%) and 66 (27.9%) patients with CATS scores ≥ 4 in the control and apixaban arms, respectively. Mean age was 61.0 ± 11.8 and 60.6 ± 12.6 years in the control and apixaban arms, respectively. A minority of patients, 11.5% in the control arm and 15.1% in the apixaban arm, had ECOG scores of ≥ 2. The 6-month cumulative incidence of VTE was 13% (95% CI 7 to 23) in patients with a Khorana score of ≥ 3 and 20% (95% CI 11 to 35) in patients with a CATS score of ≥ 4, respectively (Figures 1 and 2). The linear trend for association of CATS risk scores with VTE was statistically significant (p = 0.0015). The linear trend for association of Khorana risk scores with VTE did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.059). There was a total of 7 overall bleeding events (8.1%; 95% CI 2.4 to 13.9) in patients with a Khorana score of ≥ 3, two of which were major (2.3%; 95% CI 0 to 5.5). There were 7 overall bleeding events (10.6%; 95%CI: 3.2 to 18.0) in patients with a CATS score of ≥ 4, two of which were major (3.03%; 95%CI: 0 to 7.17). Neither increasing Khorana (p = 0.85, p = 0.69) or CATS scores (p = 0.58, p = 0.54) were significantly associated with either increased major or overall bleeding, respectively. Conclusion: Incorporation of d-dimer and p-selectin enhances VTE risk stratification in ambulatory cancer patients with a Khorana score of ≥ 2. Disclosures Carrier: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Key:Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Wells:BMS/Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3406-3406
Author(s):  
Suman L. Sood ◽  
Cathy Stabler ◽  
Mariam Khan ◽  
Angela E. Hawley ◽  
Kenneth E. Guire ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3406 Background: Accurate and early diagnosis of DVT is crucial to prevent untreated DVT from progressing to fatal PE. Clinical scoring systems used in combination with D-dimer for DVT diagnosis can exclude but not confirm DVT, and vascular ultrasound is still needed. Diagnostic algorithms are challenging in cancer, where the burden of VTE is higher, clinical scores less accurate and baseline D-dimer frequently elevated. Soluble P-selectin (sPsel) is expressed upon activation of platelets and endothelial cells by a thrombotic stimulus. sPsel is known to be important in predicting VTE in cancer patients. We previously showed that elevated sPsel in combination with Wells' score can confirm lower extremity (LE) DVT with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% in a general patient cohort (Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2011; 17:425–31). To date, no validated biomarker can establish VTE in cancer patients. The primary objective of this analysis was to identify a biomarker that alone or in combination confirms the presence of acute DVT in cancer patients. Secondary objective was to apply the previously derived model to patients with active cancer. Methods: Patients referred to the diagnostic vascular ultrasound lab with signs or symptoms concerning for acute LE DVT were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Following informed consent, patients underwent LE doppler, clinical assessment, and blood draw for biomarkers sPsel, D-dimer, and CRP. Exclusion criteria were age < 18, isolated calf vein DVT, pregnant, nursing, or on therapeutic anticoagulation. Only subjects with active cancer, defined as actively receiving anti-tumor therapy, or with physical or radiological evidence of malignancy within 6 months of enrollment, were included in this subset analysis of previously published data. Continuous and categorical values were compared with t-test and chi-squared test, respectively. PPV and NPV were estimated from cut points. Results: Between 2006 to 2012, 442 patients with LE DVT were eligible for analysis; 99 had active cancer. 60 cases (63% male) had a confirmed proximal LE DVT; 39 controls (56% male) had leg pain but negative for VTE. Cases had increased prior history (p=0.001) and family history of VTE (p=0.039). No difference in mean age (62.4 vs. 61.8 years), BMI, or active chemotherapy was seen. Cancer types (%) included: breast (4), lung (10), hematologic (22), melanoma (3), GI (16), GU (16), Gyn (11), brain (4), other (6). sPsel, D-dimer, CRP, and Wells' score were all elevated in cases versus controls at time of DVT diagnosis. Application of our previously derived model of sPsel + Wells' with cut point of 2 yielded a similar PPV but lower NPV in active cancer versus non-cancer patients. Had imaging not been available, we could have ruled in or out 27.5% (27/98) patients for LE-DVT with this rule. D-dimer + Wells' had a superior NPV, albeit in a low number of patients. Raising the Wells' cut point to 3 (to accommodate a point assigned in the score for active cancer) improved the PPV for both the sPsel and D-dimer models, at the expense of the NPV in the D-dimer model. 38% (37/98) cancer patients could be ruled in or out for LE-DVT without imaging in this sPsel model. Conclusions: D-dimer is the most commonly used marker to rule out acute DVT. However, due to its low specificity and elevated baseline value in patients with cancer, it cannot be used to confirm clot presence. In patients with active cancer presenting with potential symptoms of LE DVT, sPsel, D-dimer, CRP and Wells' criteria were all elevated in cases versus controls. A combination of sPsel ≥ 90 ng/mL + Wells' ≥ 3 was superior to the D-dimer + Wells score to rule in clot at the time of presentation. D-dimer remained superior to rule out clot in this population. In the future, rapid VTE diagnosis through the use of novel biomarkers such as sPsel may help improve morbidity and mortality. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1991 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 438-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Luttrell ◽  
Sall Watters

Abstract We used a computer-based method to help validate the reference ranges of assays for triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxin (T4). A retrospective search of a database of laboratory results for the previous six months identified all patients with apparent euthyroid status, as defined by methods independent of the immunoassay under review. A computer-generated reference group (CGR Group) of 2001 records had a gaussian distribution of T4 values and a reference range (mean +/- 2 SD) of 56-161 nmol/L, compared with the supplier's suggested range for euthyroid subjects (58-148 nmol/L) and an in-house range of 60-144 nmol/L for a group of 97 normal subjects. A similar CGR Group of 1902 records gave a reference range for T3 of 0.7-2.1 nmol/L (manufacturer's range 0.8-2.8; normal subjects 0.8-2.2). An attempt to devise a reference range for thyrotropin failed when we found that its concentration in the population of patients with normal values for thyroid hormones was distributed differently from that in the normal population. The method is intended to be used in addition to conventionally derived ranges based on results for healthy subjects. It allows the laboratory to conveniently verify the reference ranges for T3 and T4 assays at regular intervals by using very large samples with appropriate age, sex, and weight distribution, drawn from the population of patients' samples submitted for analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 191.1-192
Author(s):  
S. Amikishiyev ◽  
M. G. Gunver ◽  
M. Bektas ◽  
S. Aghamuradov ◽  
B. Ince ◽  
...  

Background:COVID-19 runs a severe disease associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in a subset of patients, and a hyperinflammatory response developing in the second week contributes to the worse outcome. Inflammatory features are mostly compatible with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) observed in other viral infections despite resulting in milder changes. Early detection and treatment of MAS may be associated with a better outcome. However, available criteria for MAS associated with other causes have not been helpful.Objectives:To identify distinct features of MAS associated with COVID-19 using a large database enabling to assess of dynamic changes.Methods:PCR-confirmed hospitalized COVID-19 patients followed between March and September 2020 constituted the discovery set. Patients considered to have findings of MAS by experienced physicians and given anakinra or tocilizumab were classified as the MAS group and the remaining patients as the non-MAS group. The MAS group was then re-grouped as the cases with exact-MAS and borderline-MAS cases by the study group. Clinical and laboratory data including the Ct values of the PCR test were obtained from the database, and dynamic changes were evaluated especially for the first 14 days of the hospitalization. The second set of 162 patients followed between September-December 2020 were used as the replication group to test the preliminary criteria. In the second set, hospitalization rules were changed, and all patients required oxygen support and received dexamethasone 6mg/day or equivalent glucocorticoids. Daily changes were calculated for the laboratory items in MAS, borderline, and non-MAS groups to see the days differentiating the groups, and ROC curves and lower and upper limits (10-90%) of the selected parameters were calculated to determine the cutoff values.Results:A total of 769 PCR-confirmed hospitalized patients were analysed, and 77 of them were classified as MAS and 83 as borderline MAS patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline viral loads of MAS patients compared to the non-MAS group according to the Ct values. Daily dynamic changes in the MAS group differed from the non-MAS group especially around the 6th day of hospitalization, and more than a twofold increase in ferritin and a 1.5-fold increase in D-dimer levels compared to the baseline values help to define the MAS group. Twelve items selected for the criteria are given in Table 1 below. The total score of 45 provided 79.6% sensitivity for the MAS (including borderline cases) and 81.3% specificity around days 5 and 6 in the discovery set, and a score of 60 increased the specificity to 94.9% despite a decrease in sensitivity to 40.8%. The same set provided a similar sensitivity (80.3%) in the replication, but a lower specificity (47.4-66% on days 6 to 9) due to a group of control patients with findings of MAS possibly masked by glucocorticoids.Table 1.Preliminary Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome Associated with Coronavirus Disease-191.Fever (>37.0 °C)2.Ferritin concentration > 550 ng/mL3.More than 2 times increase of ferritin concentration within 7 days of disease onset4.Neutrophil count > 6000 cell/mm35.Lymphopenia < 1000 cell/mm36.Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 67.D-dimer concentration > 1000 ng/ml8.More than 50% increase of D-dimer concentration within 7 days of disease onset9.CRP concetration > 50 mg/L10.LDH concentration > 300 U/L11.ALT or AST concentration > 50 U/L12.Procalcitonin concentration < 1.21 point for each positive item assessed on Days 5-7Score calculation: Total points / 12 x 100Possible MAS ≥45 and Definite MAS ≥60Conclusion:This study defined a set of preliminary criteria using the most relevant items of MAS according to the dynamic changes in the parameters in a group of COVID-19 patients. A score of 45 would be helpful to define a possible MAS group with reasonable sensitivity and specificity to start necessary treatments as early as possible.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001510
Author(s):  
Albert Zishen Lim ◽  
Daniel M Jones ◽  
Matthew G D Bates ◽  
Andrew M Schaefer ◽  
John O'Sullivan ◽  
...  

ObjectiveRegular cardiac surveillance is advocated for patients with primary mitochondrial DNA disease. However, there is limited information to guide clinical practice in mitochondrial conditions caused by nuclear DNA defects. We sought to determine the frequency and spectrum of cardiac abnormalities identified in adult mitochondrial disease originated from the nuclear genome.MethodsAdult patients with a genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease were identified and followed up at the national clinical service for mitochondrial disease in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK (January 2009 to December 2018). Case notes, molecular genetics reports, laboratory data and cardiac investigations, including serial electrocardiograms and echocardiograms, were reviewed.ResultsIn this cohort-based observational study, we included 146 adult patients (92 women) (mean age 53.6±18.7 years, 95% CI 50.6 to 56.7) with a mean follow-up duration of 7.9±5.1 years (95% CI 7.0 to 8.8). Eleven different nuclear genotypes were identified: TWNK, POLG, RRM2B, OPA1, GFER, YARS2, TYMP, ETFDH, SDHA, TRIT1 and AGK. Cardiac abnormalities were detected in 14 patients (9.6%). Seven of these patients (4.8%) had early-onset cardiac manifestations: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy required cardiac transplantation (AGK; n=2/2), left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and bifascicular heart block (GFER; n=2/3) and mild LV dysfunction (GFER; n=1/3, YARS2; n=1/2, TWNK; n=1/41). The remaining seven patients had acquired heart disease most likely related to conventional cardiovascular risk factors and presented later in life (14.6±12.8 vs 55.1±8.9 years, p<0.0001).ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the risk of cardiac involvement is genotype specific, suggesting that routine cardiac screening is not indicated for most adult patients with nuclear gene-related mitochondrial disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Caro Codon ◽  
T Lopez-Fernandez ◽  
C Alvarez-Ortega ◽  
P Zamora Aunon ◽  
I Rodriguez Rodriguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The actual usefulness of CV risk factor assessment in the prognostic evaluation of cancer patients treated with cardiotoxic treatment remains largely unknown. Design Prospective multicenter study in patients scheduled to receive anticancer therapy related with moderate/high cardiotoxic risk. Methods A total of 1324 patients underwent follow-up in a dedicated cardio-oncology clinic from April 2012 to October 2017. Special care was given to the identification and control of CV risk factors. Clinical data, blood samples and echocardiographic parameters were prospectively collected according to protocol, at baseline before cancer therapy and then at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years and 2 years after initiation of cancer therapy. Results At baseline, 893 patients (67.4%) presented at least 1 risk factor, with a significant number of patients newly diagnosed during follow-up. Individual risk factors were not related with worse prognosis during a 2-year follow-up. However, a higher Systemic Coronary Risk Estimation (SCORE) was significantly associated with higher rates of severe cardiotoxicity and all-cause mortality [HR 1.79 (95% CI 1.16–2.76) for SCORE 5–9 and HR 4.90 (95% CI 2.44–9.82) for SCORE ≥10 when compared with patients with lower SCORE (0–4)]. Conclusions This large cohort of patients treated with a potentially cardiotoxic regimen showed a significant prevalence of CV risk factors at baseline and significant incidence during follow-up. Baseline cardiovascular risk assessment using SCORE predicted severe cardiotoxicity and all-cause mortality. Therefore, its use should be recommended in the evaluation of cancer patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This study was partially funded by the Fondo Investigaciones Sanitarias (Spain), Centro de Investigaciόn Biomédica en Red Cardiovascular CIBER-CV (Spain)


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruofei Du ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Lixia Ma ◽  
Leon M. Larcher ◽  
Han Tang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The adverse reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapy were closely associated with treatment response, clinical outcome, quality of life (QoL) of patients with cancer. However, few studies presented the correlation between ADRs of targeted therapy and treatment effects among cancer patients. This study was to explore the characteristics of ADRs with targeted therapy and the prognosis of cancer patients based on the clinical data. Methods A retrospective secondary data analysis was conducted within an ADR data set including 2703 patients with targeted therapy from three Henan medical centers of China between January 2018 and December 2019. The significance was evaluated with chi-square test between groups with or without ADRs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression with backward stepwise method were applied to assess the difference of pathological characteristics in patients with cancer. Using the univariate Cox regression method, the actuarial probability of overall survival was performed to compare the clinical outcomes between these two groups. Results A total of 485 patients were enrolled in this study. Of all patients, 61.0% (n = 296) occurred ADRs including skin damage, fatigue, mucosal damage, hypertension and gastrointestinal discomfort as the top 5 complications during the target therapy. And 62.1% of ADRs were mild to moderate, more than half of the ADRs occurred within one month, 68.6% ADRs lasted more than one month. Older patients (P = 0.022) and patients with lower education level (P = 0.036), more than 2 comorbidities (P = 0.021), longer medication time (P = 0.022), drug combination (P = 0.033) and intravenous administration (P = 0.019) were more likely to have ADRs. Those with ADRs were more likely to stop taking (P = 0.000), change (P = 0.000), adjust (P = 0.000), or not take the medicine on time (P = 0.000). The number of patients with recurrence (P = 0.000) and metastasis (P = 0.006) were statistically significant difference between ADRs and non-ADRs group. And the patients were significantly poor prognosis in ADRs groups compared with non-ADRs group. Conclusion The high incidence of ADRs would affect the treatment and prognosis of patients with cancer. We should pay more attention to these ADRs and develop effective management strategies.


Author(s):  
Aya Yassin ◽  
Maryam Ali Abdelkader ◽  
Rehab M. Mohammed ◽  
Ahmed M. Osman

Abstract Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the known sequels of COVID-19 infection. We aimed to assess the incidence of PE in patients with COVID-19 infection and to evaluate the relationship between the CT severity of the disease and the laboratory indicators. This was a retrospective study conducted on 96 patients with COVID-19 infection proved by positive PCR who underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with a calculation of the CT severity of COVID-19 infection. Available patients’ complaint and laboratory data at the time of CTPA were correlated with PE presence and disease severity. Results Forty patients (41.7%) showed positive PE with the median time for the incidence of PE which was 12 days after onset of the disease. No significant correlation was found between the incidence of PE and the patients’ age, sex, laboratory results, and the CT severity of COVID-19. A statistically significant relation was found between the incidence of PE and the patients’ desaturation, hemoptysis, and chest pain. A highly significant correlation was found between the incidence of PE and the rising in the D-dimer level as well as the progressive CT findings when compared to the previous one. Conclusion CT progression and the rising in D-dimer level are considered the most important parameters suggesting underlying PE in patients with positive COVID-19 infection which is commonly seen during the second week of infection and alert the use of CT pulmonary angiography to exclude or confirm PE. This is may help in improving the management of COVID-19 infection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document