scholarly journals Brine Chemistry Control Oil Reservoir Pressure in Giant Mishrif Reservoir, Southern Iraq

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih Awadh
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Rashid Kafiatullin

Oil reservoir pressure maintenance pumps are often pushed to operate significantly outside of their original design parameters. This can cause operating problems which impact their reliability and efficiency. The author offers the evaluation methodology for energy parameters and energy saving potential of oil reservoir pressure maintenance pumps in order to develop major pump parameters like efficiency, pressure, and specific electric power. The methodology was tested on 42 pump units. The values of variations of basic parameters indicate the energy saving potential of pump units.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih Muhammad Awadh ◽  
Heba S. Al-Mimar ◽  
Abdullah A. Al-Yaseri

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenxiang Chen ◽  
Zubo Zhang ◽  
Qingjie Liu ◽  
Xu Chen ◽  
Prince Opoku Appau ◽  
...  

Oil production by natural energy of the reservoir is usually the first choice for oil reservoir development. Conversely, to effectively develop tight oil reservoir is challenging due to its ultra-low formation permeability. A novel platform for experimental investigation of oil recovery from tight sandstone oil reservoirs by pressure depletion has been proposed in this paper. A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of pressure depletion degree, pressure depletion rate, reservoir temperature, overburden pressure, formation pressure coefficient and crude oil properties on oil recovery by reservoir pressure depletion. In addition, the characteristics of pressure propagation during the reservoir depletion process were monitored and studied. The experimental results showed that oil recovery factor positively correlated with pressure depletion degree when reservoir pressure was above the bubble point pressure. Moreover, equal pressure depletion degree led to the same oil recovery factor regardless of different pressure depletion rate. However, it was noticed that faster pressure drop resulted in a higher oil recovery rate. For oil reservoir without dissolved gas (dead oil), oil recovery was 2–3% due to the limited reservoir natural energy. In contrast, depletion from live oil reservoir resulted in an increased recovery rate ranging from 11% to 18% due to the presence of dissolved gas. This is attributed to the fact that when reservoir pressure drops below the bubble point pressure, the dissolved gas expands and pushes the oil out of the rock pore spaces which significantly improves the oil recovery. From the pressure propagation curve, the reason for improved oil recovery is that when the reservoir pressure is lower than the bubble point pressure, the dissolved gas constantly separates and provides additional pressure gradient to displace oil. The present study will help engineers to have a better understanding of the drive mechanisms and influencing factors that affect development of tight oil reservoirs, especially for predicting oil recovery by reservoir pressure depletion.


Author(s):  
Karrar K. Abdulwahhab ◽  
Mohammed S. Al-Jawad

In this paper the pressure drop and PVT data that used in the model to describe the behavior ofreservoir fluids of 3rd pay reservoir of Zubair field is explained. The wells in Hammar-Shuaiba area showhigh Gas Oil Ratio, exceeding 1,000 scf/stb. This is bad sign and that mean reservoir pressure is reducedramatically and gas will produced , finally the energy that use to push the oil from reservoir to thesurface will decrease. Eleven samples have been collected and analyzed from all 3rd pay reservoirs overthe years, seven samples in Hammar –Shuaiba area. The PVT data resulted to be scattered, being notpossible to define any acceptable conclusion about their trend versus depths, taking also into account thatthey are not referred to the same temperature. The main difference between the old and new PVT is theBubble Point pressure at reservoir conditions, which increases from 2646 psi to 2760 psi. Historicalpressure behavior shows that water Injection is beneficial to maintain stable pressure trend. Pressureanalysis shows a strong depletion start from 2013 in various zones of Hammar Shuaiba domes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-31
Author(s):  
Damir Zadravec ◽  
Vladislav Brkić

In the process of oil reservoir waterflooding, natural water dump flood technology for reservoir pressure decline prevention is considered as an unconventional but technically less demanding, more economical and safer method in comparison to surface power water injection. With natural dump flood technology, a single well serves as a water producer from a water bearing layer (aquifer) and simultaneously through gravity and the pressure difference between the aquifer and the depleted oil reservoir, it serves as a water injector inside the oil reservoir without expensive and complex injecting water treatment facilities at the surface. With the use of such technology and the running of intelligent well completion, it allows for the permanent monitoring of water production, injection rates and temperature inside the chosen reservoir. In addition, in offshore operations, the use of a subsea wellhead with a mud line suspension system allows for the placing of the injector well at the best predetermined position for water injection in a targeting reservoir and, together with an efficient subsurface acoustic data acquisition system, leads to better reservoir management and well integrity improvement. The overview and critical reflection of the drilling and intelligent completion of a natural dump flooding well for reservoir pressure support in partially depleted oil reservoirs in the Persian/Arabian Gulf has been given, referring to both their preparation and execution phase. The possibility of applying natural water dump flood was also considered in the Croatian onshore Beničanci oil field through a pilot project of water injection into the Be-62 well.


Author(s):  
Sh. Nigamatov ◽  
Л.Р. Ismagilova ◽  
S. Andronov ◽  
A. Markov ◽  
А.Н. Boshchenko ◽  
...  

The oil rim reserves development suggests complexity in maintaining the balance of gas and oil withdrawals from the reservoir, choosing the optimal well design and geosteering, justifying well operation conditions, etc. In addition, gas and oil reservoir can be complicated by diagenetic alterations of deposits, blocked structure, abnormal thermobaric conditions. The paper presents the results of conceptual approach to the Botuobinskiy horizon’s oil rim development design at the Chayandinskoye oil and gas condensate field with the presence of the above complications. This experience can be applied to assess the majority of fields in Eastern Siberia.


2020 ◽  
pp. 3294-3307
Author(s):  
Ahmed S. Al-Banna ◽  
Nowfal A. Nassir ◽  
Ghazi H. Al-Sharaa

A comparison was conducted between two wells, Kt-1and Kt-2, in Kumait and two wells, Du-1and Du-2, in Dujaila oil fields that belong to Mishrif formation, southern Iraq.  Seismic inversion method was employed to detect oil and water reservoirs. The comparison included the behavior of acoustic impedance (AI) of fluids and the lithology with related petrophysical properties. The values of water saturation, Shale volume (Vsh), and effective porosity were compared between the AI,  two fluid reservoirs. It was found that the AI value for the oil reservoir unit is relatively low to medium, whereas it was relatively medium for the water reservoir. Effective porosity value showed, in general, an increase in the oil reservoir and a slightly decrease in the water reservoir. The Vsh and water saturation (Sw) values of the oil reservoir unit were in general lower than those in the water reservoir, which indicates the presence of hydrocarbons accumulation. The lithology and porosity are the main factors affecting the acoustic impedance values. Despite the small difference in density between oil and water, these two fluids still show perceptible variation in their properties.  


2011 ◽  
Vol 71-78 ◽  
pp. 2049-2054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li Zhu ◽  
Liang Liang Jiang ◽  
Li Cheng Liu ◽  
Yu Qiu Lin

Liaohe block J is a super heavy oil reservoir with relatively strong anisotropy and active edge-bottom water condition. After more than two decades of huff and puff production, the block now reaches a low production rate period, and the local part of the block also encounters serious edge-bottom water invasion. Now steam flooding is used as a switching method to invert the production decline tendency. Applied with thermal recovery process and numerical simulation method, reservoir pressure at flooding conversion, pressure control in steam flooding, injection-production parameters and well pattern are used to optimize the key techniques of steam flooding design. The design results are as follows: the reservoir pressure at flooding conversion as well as during steam flooding process should be controlled below 5 Mpa; the unit volume steam injection rate is 1.65t/d.hm2.m and the bottom-hole steam quality of injecter is no less than 53%; the injection-production ratio is 1.1:1 and inversed 9 point pattern with a 83m well space is used. The steam flooding pilot has been carried out for more than 2 years and obtains favorable benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document