scholarly journals Recommendations for the treatment of hypertension in the elderly and very elderly: a scotoma within international guidelines

Author(s):  
HH Schäfer ◽  
Villiers de ◽  
I Sudano ◽  
S Dischinger ◽  
GR Theus ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Pinna ◽  
Claudio Pascale ◽  
Micaela La Regina ◽  
Francesco Orlandini

IntroductionThere is a high prevalence of hypertension in the elderly, as evidenced by clinical and health behavioral policies. Still, there are uncertainties on the treatment of hypertension, especially treatment of the very elderly. These considerations have largely been ignored in clinical trials due to concern regarding contamination by other pathologies that are difficult to frame and manage.Methods We performed an effective and ample literature review and provided reflections on the Consensus Conference ACCF/AHA 2011 on the principle types of hypertension found in the elderly. We also considered the associated principle pathologies for various treatments and related organs.Discussion Even if the goal of treatment of elevated blood pressure in the elderly is same as in younger population, it is no longer certain that a target systolic blood pressure (SBP) <140 mmHg should be persistently reached in the very elderly. It is important to note that for all studies these values have never been reached. In the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) the preferred target is a SBP >160 mmHg. Treating hypertension in the elderly and very elderly reduces the risk of stroke and heart failure, though the evidence is inconclusive for all-cause mortality.Conclusion Hypertension in the elderly is very common and needs to be treated with criteria that consider the patient's age, comorbidities, lifestyle and adherence. Above all, in the very elderly, therapeutic treatment should be personalized according to the above criteria. Where possible pharmaceutical therapy should be limited at the preference of healthy lifestyle changes (physical activity, diet, etc.).


Author(s):  
Niken Setyaningrum ◽  
Andri Setyorini ◽  
Fachruddin Tri Fitrianta

ABSTRACTBackground: Hypertension is one of the most common diseases, because this disease is suffered byboth men and women, as well as adults and young people. Treatment of hypertension does not onlyrely on medications from the doctor or regulate diet alone, but it is also important to make our bodyalways relaxed. Laughter can help to control blood pressure by reducing endocrine stress andcreating a relaxed condition to deal with relaxation.Objective: The general objective of the study was to determine the effect of laughter therapy ondecreasing elderly blood pressure in UPT Panti Wredha Budhi Dharma Yogyakarta.Methods: The design used in this study is a pre-experimental design study with one group pre-posttestresearch design where there is no control group (comparison). The population in this study wereelderly aged over> 60 years at 55 UPT Panti Wredha Budhi Dharma Yogyakarta. The method oftaking in this study uses total sampling. The sample in this study were 55 elderly. Data analysis wasused to determine the difference in blood pressure before and after laughing therapy with a ratio datascale that was using Pairs T-TestResult: There is an effect of laughing therapy on blood pressure in the elderly at UPT Panti WredhaBudhi Dharma Yogyakarta marked with a significant value of 0.000 (P <0.05)


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Thoenes ◽  
D Spirk ◽  
M Böhm ◽  
F Mahfoud ◽  
L Thevathasan ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry H.L. Ooi ◽  
Patrick L. Coleman ◽  
Joseph Duggan ◽  
Yvonne M. OʼMeara

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. S95-S99
Author(s):  
J. Oliván Martinez ◽  
M. J. Miranda García ◽  
A. Rodriguez Botaro ◽  
J. L. Pizarro ◽  
J. Carretero ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Marschall ◽  
H Del Castillo Carnevali ◽  
F Goncalves Sanchez ◽  
M Torres Lopez ◽  
F A Delgado Calva ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The number of elderly patients undergoing pacemaker (PM) implantation is constantly growing. However, information on survival and prognostic factors of this particular patient group is scarce. Recent studies suggest that comorbidity burden may have an equal, if not greater, effect on length of in-hospital stay (LOS), complications and mortality, as age in a variety of clinical scenarios. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the survival of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing PM implantation, as well as to investigate the impact of comorbidities, as compared to age, on excess of length of in-hospital stay and mortality. Methods This is a retrospective observational study of a single centre. Patients that underwent (both elective and non-elective) PM implantation between June 2016 and December 2018 in our centre, were included for chart review. Elderly patients were defined as those with age 80–89 years, whereas very elderly patients were defined as those with ≥90 years of age. Excess in LOS was defined as an in-hospital stay &gt;3 days. Results A total of 507 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 80.6 (±8.5) years. 255 elderly and 60 very elderly patients were included. Median follow-up time was 24 months. Baseline clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mortality rate for elderly patients was 18.8% for the elderly and 36.7% for the very elderly (p=0.002). The presence of ≥2 comorbidities (defined in Table 1) resulted to be a significant predictor for the excess of LOS, whereas age did not significantly predict excess of LOS (HR: 7.1 (4.4–11.4), p&lt;0.001); HR: 1.01 (0.9–1.1), p=0.56, respectively). Neither age, nor comorbidity burden predicted the appearance of device related complications. Both comorbidites and age predicted mortality. However, the association was stronger for the presence of comorbidites, than for age (HR: 1.9 (1.1–3.1), p=0.002 vs HR: 1.1 (1.1–1.2), p&lt;0.001, respectively). Elderly patients with low comorbidity burden (&lt;2 comorbidities) showed no significant differences with regards to LOS and mortality when compared to younger patients (2 (2–4) vs 3 (2–5) days, p=0.529 and 18.3% vs 17.4%, p=0.702; respectively). Conclusions Our study shows a good life expectancy of elderly and very elderly patients, that underwent PM implantation, with a survival rate that is comparable to the general population. Comorbidity burden, rather than age, significantly predicts excess of LOS and should therefore be the driving factor in the approach of patients undergoing new PM implantation. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document