scholarly journals The Emilia 2012 sequence: a macroseismic survey

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Tertulliani ◽  
Luca Arcoraci ◽  
Michele Berardi ◽  
Filippo Bernardini ◽  
Beatriz Brizuela ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Time ◽  
Seismic Activity ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Rupture Zone ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Southern Germany ◽  
Po Valley ◽  
South Eastern ◽  
Macroseismic Survey

<p>On May 20, 2012, at 4:03 local time (2:03 UTC), a large part of the Po Valley between the cities of Ferrara, Modena and Mantova was struck by a damaging earthquake (Ml 5.9). The epicenter was located by the Istituto Nazionale di Geo-fisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) seismic network [ISIDe 2010] at 44.889 ˚N and 11.228 ˚E, approximately 30 km west of Ferrara (Figure 1). The event was preceded by a foreshock that occurred at 01:13 local time, with a magnitude of Ml 4. The mainshock started an intense seismic sequence that lasted for weeks, counting more than 2,000 events, six of which had Ml &gt;5. The strongest earthquakes of this sequence occurred on May 29, 2012, with Ml 5.8 and Ml 5.3, recorded at 9:00 and 12:55 local time, respectively. The epicenters of the May 29, 2012, events were located at the westernmost part of the rupture zone of the May 20, 2012, earthquake (Figure 2). The May 20 and 29, 2012, earthquakes were felt through the whole of northern and central Italy, and as far as Switzerland, Slovenia, Croatia, Austria, south-eastern France and southern Germany. Historical information reveals that the seismic activity in the Po Valley is moderate […]</p>

scholarly journals Recent seismicity before the 24 August 2016 Mw 6.0 Central Italy Earthquake as recorded by the ReSIICO seismic network

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Marzorati ◽  
Marco Cattaneo ◽  
Massimo Frapiccini ◽  
Giancarlo Monachesi ◽  
Chiara Ladina
Keyword(s):  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
L’Aquila Earthquake ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Seismic Sequences ◽  
Seismic Swarm ◽  
Central Italy Earthquake ◽  
2009 L’Aquila Earthquake ◽  
Preparatory Phase

The seismicity of the last four years before the August 24 2016 01:36 UTC M<sub>W</sub> 6.0 earthquake that struck central Italy is presented with the aim to understand the preparatory phase of the event. In contrast with the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake that was preceded by a seismic sequence and the 2013-2015 Gubbio seismic swarm that, to date, is ended without any strong event, our preliminary results don’t show seismic sequences in the last months previous the mainshock of the August 24 2016 and a low similarity between seismicity clusters in the last four years and the foreshocks.

scholarly journals Preliminary macroseismic survey of the 2016 Amatrice seismic sequence

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariano Angelo Zanini ◽  
Lorenzo Hofer ◽  
Flora Faleschini ◽  
Paolo Zampieri ◽  
Nicola Fabris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Density ◽  
Seismic Event ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Macroseismic Scale ◽  
Macroseismic Intensities ◽  
The University ◽  
Macroseismic Survey

<p>After the recent destructive L’Aquila 2009 and Emilia-Romagna 2012 earthquakes, a sudden M<span>w </span>6.0 <span style="font-size: 10px;">seismic event hit Central Italy on August 24, 2016. A low population density characterizes the area but, </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">due to its nighttime occurrence, about 300 victims were registered. This work presents the first preliminary </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">results of a macroseismic survey conducted by two teams of the University of Padova in the territories </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">that suffered major damages. Macroseismic intensities were assessed according to the European </span><span style="font-size: 10px;">Macroseismic Scale (EMS98) for 180 sites.</span></p>

scholarly journals SISMIKO: emergency network deployment and data sharing for the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Moretti ◽  
Silvia Pondrelli ◽  
Lucia Margheriti ◽  
Luigi Abruzzese ◽  
Mario Anselmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Station ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Seismic Monitoring ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
British Geological Survey ◽  
Epicentral Area ◽  
Seismic Stations

<p>At 01:36 UTC (03:36 local time) on August 24th 2016, an earthquake Mw 6.0 struck an extensive sector of the central Apennines (coordinates: latitude 42.70° N, longitude 13.23° E, 8.0 km depth). The earthquake caused about 300 casualties and severe damage to the historical buildings and economic activity in an area located near the borders of the Umbria, Lazio, Abruzzo and Marche regions. The Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) located in few minutes the hypocenter near Accumoli, a small town in the province of Rieti. In the hours after the quake, dozens of events were recorded by the National Seismic Network (Rete Sismica Nazionale, RSN) of the INGV, many of which had a ML &gt; 3.0. The density and coverage of the RSN in the epicentral area meant the epicenter and magnitude of the main event and subsequent shocks that followed it in the early hours of the seismic sequence were well constrained. However, in order to better constrain the localizations of the aftershock hypocenters, especially the depths, a denser seismic monitoring network was needed. Just after the mainshock, SISMIKO, the coordinating body of the emergency seismic network at INGV, was activated in order to install a temporary seismic network integrated with the existing permanent network in the epicentral area. From August the 24th to the 30th, SISMIKO deployed eighteen seismic stations, generally six components (equipped with both velocimeter and accelerometer), with thirteen of the seismic station transmitting in real-time to the INGV seismic monitoring room in Rome. The design and geometry of the temporary network was decided in consolation with other groups who were deploying seismic stations in the region, namely EMERSITO (a group studying site-effects), and the emergency Italian strong motion network (RAN) managed by the National Civil Protection Department (DPC). Further 25 BB temporary seismic stations were deployed by colleagues of the British Geological Survey (BGS) and the School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh in collaboration with INGV. All data acquired from SISMIKO stations, are quickly available at the European Integrated Data Archive (EIDA). The data acquired by the SISMIKO stations were included in the preliminary analysis that was performed by the Bollettino Sismico Italiano (BSI), the Centro Nazionale Terremoti (CNT) staff working in Ancona, and the INGV-MI, described below.</p>

scholarly journals Failure Analysis of Apennine Masonry Churches Severely Damaged during the 2016 Central Italy Seismic Sequence

Buildings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Clementi
Keyword(s):  
Case Studies ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Numerical Data ◽  
Sensitivity Study ◽  
Nonlinear Material ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Nonlinear Approach ◽  
Nonlinear Static ◽  
Masonry Churches ◽  
Global And Local

This paper presents a detailed study of the damages and collapses suffered by various masonry churches in the aftermath of the seismic sequence of Central Italy in 2016. The damages will first be analyzed and then compared with the numerical data obtained through 3D simulations with eigenfrequency and then nonlinear static analyses (i.e., pushover). The main purposes of this study are: (i) to create an adequately consistent sensitivity study on several definite case studies to obtain an insight into the role played by geometry—which is always unique when referred to churches—and by irregularities; (ii) validate or address the applicability limits of the more widespread nonlinear approach, widely recommended by the Italian Technical Regulations. Pushover analyses are conducted assuming that the masonry behaves as a nonlinear material with different tensile and compressive strengths. The consistent number of case studies investigated will show how conventional static approaches can identify, albeit in a qualitative way, the most critical macro-elements that usually trigger both global and local collapses, underlining once again how the phenomena are affected by the geometry of stones and bricks, the texture of the wall face, and irregularities in the plan and elevation and in addition to hypotheses made on the continuity between orthogonal walls.

scholarly journals Exceedance of design actions in epicentral areas: insights from the ShakeMap envelopes for the 2016–2017 central Italy sequence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iunio Iervolino ◽  
Pasquale Cito ◽  
Chiara Felicetta ◽  
Giovanni Lanzano ◽  
Antonio Vitale
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Civil Defense ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Ground Shaking ◽  
Motion Effect ◽  
Observed Damage

AbstractShakeMap is the tool to evaluate the ground motion effect of earthquakes in vast areas. It is useful to delimit the zones where the shaking is expected to have been most significant, for civil defense rapid response. From the earthquake engineering point of view, it can be used to infer the seismic actions on the built environment to calibrate vulnerability models or to define the reconstruction policies based on observed damage vs shaking. In the case of long-lasting seismic sequences, it can be useful to develop ShakeMap envelopes, that is, maps of the largest ground intensity among those from the ShakeMap of (selected) events of a seismic sequence, to delimit areas where the effects of the whole sequence have been of structural engineering relevance. This study introduces ShakeMap envelopes and discusses them for the central Italy 2016–2017 seismic sequence. The specific goals of the study are: (i) to compare the envelopes and the ShakeMap of the main events of the sequence to make the case for sequence-based maps; (ii) to quantify the exceedance of design seismic actions based on the envelopes; (iii) to make envelopes available for further studies and the reconstruction planning; (iv) to gather insights on the (repeated) exceedance of design seismic actions at some sites. Results, which include considerations of uncertainty in ShakeMap, show that the sequence caused exceedance of design hazard in thousands of square kilometers. The most relevant effects of the sequence are, as expected, due to the mainshock, yet seismic actions larger than those enforced by the code for structural design are found also around the epicenters of the smaller magnitude events. At some locations, the succession of ground-shaking that has excited structures, provides insights on structural damage accumulation that has likely taken place; something that is not accounted for explicitly in modern seismic design. The envelopes developed are available as supplemental material.

scholarly journals Along-strike rupture directivity of earthquakes of the 2009 L'Aquila, central Italy, seismic sequence

2015 ◽  
Vol 203 (1) ◽  
pp. 399-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Calderoni ◽  
A. Rovelli ◽  
Y. Ben-Zion ◽  
R. Di Giovambattista
Keyword(s):  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Rupture Directivity

scholarly journals Iconic crumbling of the clock tower in Amatrice after 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: advanced numerical insight

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 314-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Poiani ◽  
V. Gazzani ◽  
F. Clementi ◽  
G. Milani ◽  
M. Valente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Sequence

scholarly journals Basement Mapping of the Fucino Basin in Central Italy by ITRESC Modeling of Gravity Data

Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 398
Author(s):  
Federico Cella ◽  
Rosa Nappi ◽  
Valeria Paoletti ◽  
Giovanni Florio
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Activity ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Gravity Modeling ◽  
Ground Shaking ◽  
Sedimentary Evolution ◽  
Fucino Basin

Sediments infilling in intermontane basins in areas with high seismic activity can strongly affect ground-shaking phenomena at the surface. Estimates of thickness and density distribution within these basin infills are crucial for ground motion amplification analysis, especially where demographic growth in human settlements has implied increasing seismic risk. We employed a 3D gravity modeling technique (ITerative RESCaling—ITRESC) to investigate the Fucino Basin (Apennines, central Italy), a half-graben basin in which intense seismic activity has recently occurred. For the first time in this region, a 3D model of the Meso-Cenozoic carbonate basement morphology was retrieved through the inversion of gravity data. Taking advantage of the ITRESC technique, (1) we were able to (1) perform an integration of geophysical and geological data constraints and (2) determine a density contrast function through a data-driven process. Thus, we avoided assuming a priori information. Finally, we provided a model that honored the gravity anomalies field by integrating many different kinds of depth constraints. Our results confirmed evidence from previous studies concerning the overall shape of the basin; however, we also highlighted several local discrepancies, such as: (a) the position of several fault lines, (b) the position of the main depocenter, and (c) the isopach map. We also pointed out the existence of a new, unknown fault, and of new features concerning known faults. All of these elements provided useful contributions to the study of the tectono-sedimentary evolution of the basin, as well as key information for assessing the local site-response effects, in terms of seismic hazards.

scholarly journals The first month of the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence: fast determination of time domain moment tensors and finite fault model analysis of the ML 5.4 aftershock

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Scognamiglio ◽  
Elisa Tinti ◽  
Matteo Quintiliani
Keyword(s):  
Time Domain ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Model Analysis ◽  
Fault Model ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Moment Tensors ◽  
Finite Fault ◽  
Finite Fault Model

<p>We present the revised Time Domain Moment Tensor (TDMT) catalogue for earthquakes with M_L larger than 3.6 of the first month of the ongoing Amatrice seismic sequence (August 24th - September 25th). Most of the retrieved focal mechanisms show NNW–SSE striking normal faults in agreement with the main NE-SW extensional deformation of Central Apennines. We also report a preliminary finite fault model analysis performed on the larger aftershock of this period of the sequence (M_w 5.4) and discuss the obtained results in the framework of aftershocks distribution.</p>

scholarly journals Assessing soil-structure interaction during the 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence (Italy): preliminary results

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arrigo Caserta ◽  
Fawzi Doumaz ◽  
Antonio Costanzo ◽  
Anna Gervasi ◽  
William Thorossian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Seismic Sequence ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
The Church ◽  
Moderate Magnitude

<p><em>We used the moderate-magnitude aftershocks succeeding to the 2016 August 24<sup>th</sup>, Mw = 6.0, Amatrice (Italy) mainshok to asses, specially during an ongoing seismic sequence, the soil-structure interaction where cultural Heritage is involved. We have chosen as case study the</em><em> San Giovanni Battista</em><em> church (A.D. 1039)  in Acquasanta Terme town, about 20 Km northeast of Amatrice. First of all we studied the soil shaking features in order to characterize the input to the monument. Then, using the recordings in the church, we tried to figure out  how the input seismic energy is distributed over the different monument parts. Some preliminary results are shown and discussed.</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document