scholarly journals The July 17, 2011, ML 4.7, Po Plain (northern Italy) earthquake: strong-motion observations from the RAIS network

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Massa ◽  
Paolo Augliera ◽  
Gianlorenzo Franceschina ◽  
Sara Lovati ◽  
Maria Zupo
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Po Plain ◽  
North West ◽  
The North ◽  
Strong Motion Network ◽  
Seismic Wavefield

<p>On July 17, 2011, at 18:30:23 UTC, a M<sub>L</sub> 4.7 earthquake occurred on the east side of the Po Plain (northern Italy), between the towns of Ferrara and Rovigo. The epicentral coordinates provided by the National Earthquake Center of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, INGV) were 45.01˚N and 11.41˚E (http://iside.rm.ingv.it/iside). The depth of the hypocenter was constrained at 8.1 km, corresponding to a buried active source that existed in the area. The source of the event was characterized by a predominant left-transverse focal mechanism, even if there was also an important reverse component. Although it did not produce relevant damage, the earthquake was clearly felt in an area of about 50 km radius around the epicenter. The maximum observed intensity was V on the Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg (MCS) scale, with a predominant distribution of damage towards the north-west. This study provides an overview of the strong-motion waveforms of the mainshock as recorded by the RAIS (Rete Accelerometrica Italia Settentrionale) strong-motion network, in particular focusing on the recordings provided by the stations located in the central part of the basin, which were installed in correspondence with hundreds of soft sediments. The preliminary results show the relevant influence of the basin on the seismic wavefield, highlighting in particular a possible site-amplification phenomena, and also affecting the ground motion at long periods (T &gt;1 s). The systematic underestimations provided by the empirical ground-motion predictive models calibrated for Italy in terms of acceleration response spectra up to 2.0 s support this hypothesis. The sharing of the 24 waveforms (in raw sac and ascii formats) recorded by RAIS is assured by the availability of the data at the ftp site: ftp://ftp.mi.ingv.it/download/RAIS-FR_rel01/.</p> <strong></strong>

Concurrent Design Forces in Structures under Three-Component Orthotropic Seismic Excitation

2002 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Anastassiadis ◽  
I. E. Avramidis ◽  
P. Panetsos
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Design Procedure ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Concurrent Design ◽  
Motion Model ◽  
Specific Point ◽  
Extreme Stress ◽  
Seismic Motion

According to the model of Penzien and Watabe, the three translational ground motion components on a specific point of the ground are statistically noncorrelated along a well-defined orthogonal system of axes p, w, and v, whose orientation remains reasonably stable over time during the strong motion phase of an earthquake. This orthotropic ground motion is described by three generally independent response spectra Sa, Sb, and Sc, respectively. The paper presents an antiseismic design procedure for structures according to the above seismic motion model. This design includes a) determination of the critical orientation of the seismic input, i.e., the orientation that gives the largest response, b) calculation of the maximum and the minimum values of any response quantity, and c) application of either the Extreme Stress Method or the Extreme Force Method for determining the most unfavorable combinations of several stress resultants (or sectional forces) acting concurrently at a specified section of a structural member.

scholarly journals What can we learn from the January 2012 northern Italy earthquakes?

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Massa ◽  
Gabriele Ameri ◽  
Sara Lovati ◽  
Rodolfo Puglia ◽  
Gianlorenzo Franceschina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Hazard Map ◽  
Civil Protection ◽  
Po Plain ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Horizontal Acceleration ◽  
Magnitude Range ◽  
Seismic Hazard Map ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Acceleration

<p>This note focuses on the ground motion recorded during the recent moderate earthquakes that occurred in the central part of northern Italy (Panel 1), a region that is characterized by low seismicity. For this area, the Italian seismic hazard map [Stucchi et al. 2011] assigns a maximum horizontal acceleration (rock site) of up to 0.2 g (10% probability of being exceeded in 50 yr). In the last 4 yr, this region has been struck by 9 earthquakes in the magnitude range 4 <span>≤</span>M<span>w </span><span>≤</span> 5.0, with the three largest located in the Northern Apennines (the M<span>w </span>4.9 and 5.0 Parma events, in December 2008 and January 2012) and on the Po Plain (the M<span>w </span>4.9 Reggio Emila event, in January 2012). We have analyzed the strong-motion data (distance &lt;300 km) from these events as recorded by stations belonging to the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (RAIS, http://rais.mi.ingv.it; RSNC, http://iside.rm.ingv.it) and the Department of Civil Protection (RAN, www.protezionecivile.it; http://itaca.mi.ingv.it). […]</p>

scholarly journals RAIS: a real time strong-motion network in northern Italy

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Augliera ◽  
Marco Massa ◽  
Ezio D'Alema ◽  
Simone Marzorati
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Northern Italy ◽  
Strong Motion Network

Engineering observations on ground motion at the Van Norman Complex after the 1994 Northridge earthquake

1996 ◽  
Vol 86 (1B) ◽  
pp. S333-S349 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Bardet ◽  
C. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Vertical Acceleration ◽  
Northridge Earthquake ◽  
Peak Acceleration ◽  
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering ◽  
1994 Northridge Earthquake

Abstract During the 1994 Northridge earthquake, the Van Norman Complex yielded an unprecedented number of recordings with high acceleration, in the close proximity of the fault rupture. These strong-motion recordings exhibited the pulses of the main event. One station recorded the largest velocity ever instrumentally recorded (177 cm/sec), resulting from a 0.86 g peak acceleration with a low frequency. Throughout the complex, the horizontal accelerations reached peak values ranging from 0.56 to 1.0 g, except for the complex center, where the peak acceleration did not exceed 0.43 g. The vertical acceleration reached maximum peak values comparable with those of the horizontal acceleration. The acceleration response spectra in the longitudinal and transverse directions were significantly different. Such a difference, which is not yet well documented in the field of geotechnical earthquake engineering, indicates that the amplitude and frequency content of the ground motion was directionally dependent in the Van Norman Complex.

30 Ooctober 2020 Samos-Sigacik Earthquake: On Strong Ground Motion and Local Site Amplification

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eser Çakti ◽  
Karin Sesetyan ◽  
Ufuk Hancilar ◽  
Merve Caglar ◽  
Emrullah Dar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Strong Ground Motion ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Aegean Sea ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Local Site ◽  
Basin Effects ◽  
Strong Ground

&lt;p&gt;The Mw 6.9 earthquake that took place offshore between the Greek island of Samos and Turkey&amp;#8217;s &amp;#304;zmir province on 30 October 2020 came hardly as a surprise. Due to the extensional tectonic regime of the Aegean and high deformation rates, earthquakes of similar size frequently occur in the Aegean Sea on fault segments close to the shores of Turkey, affecting the settlements on mainland Turkey and on the Greek Islands. Samos-Sigacik earthquake had a normal faulting mechanism. It was recorded by the strong motion networks in Turkey and Greece. Although expected, the earthquake was an&amp;#160; outstanding event in the sense of&amp;#160; highly localized, significant levels of building damage as a result of amplified ground motion levels. This presentation is an overview of strong ground motion characteristics of this important event both regionally and locally. Mainshock records suggest that local site effects, enhanced by basin effects could be responsible for structural damage in central Izmir, the third largest city of Turkey located at 60-70 km epicentral distance. We installed a seven-station network in Bayrakl&amp;#305; and Kar&amp;#351;&amp;#305;yaka districts of &amp;#304;zmir within three days of the mainshock in search of site and basin effects.&amp;#160; Through analysis of recorded aftershocks we explore the amplification characeristics of soils in the two aforementioned districts&amp;#160; and try to understand the role basin effects might have played in the resulting ground motion levels and consequently damage.&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;

2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Reveals Areas of Los Angeles That Amplify Shaking of High-Rises

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 3370-3380
Author(s):  
Monica D. Kohler ◽  
Filippos Filippitzis ◽  
Thomas Heaton ◽  
Robert W. Clayton ◽  
Richard Guy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Seismic Network ◽  
Los Angeles Basin ◽  
High Rise ◽  
The North ◽  
South Central ◽  
San Fernando

Abstract The populace of Los Angeles, California, was startled by shaking from the M 7.1 earthquake that struck the city of Ridgecrest located 200 km to the north on 6 July 2019. Although the earthquake did not cause damage in Los Angeles, the experience in high-rise buildings was frightening in contrast to the shaking felt in short buildings. Observations from 560 ground-level accelerometers reveal large variations in shaking in the Los Angeles basin that occurred for more than 2 min. The observations come from the spatially dense Community Seismic Network (CSN), combined with the sparser Southern California Seismic Network and California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program networks. Site amplification factors for periods of 1, 3, 6, and 8 s are computed as the ratio of each station’s response spectral values combined for the two horizontal directions, relative to the average of three bedrock sites. Spatially coherent behavior in site amplification emerges for periods ≥3  s, and the maximum calculated site amplifications are the largest, by factors of 7, 10, and 8, respectively, for 3, 6, and 8 s periods. The dense CSN observations show that the long-period amplification is clearly, but only partially, correlated with the depth to basement. Sites with the largest amplifications for the long periods (≥3  s) are not close to the deepest portion of the basin. At 6 and 8 s periods, the maximum amplifications occur in the western part of the Los Angeles basin and in the south-central San Fernando Valley sedimentary basin. The observations suggest that the excitation of a hypothetical high-rise located in an area characterized by the largest site amplifications could be four times larger than in a downtown Los Angeles location.

Revision of Boore (2018) Ground-Motion Predictions for Central and Eastern North America: Path and Offset Adjustments and Extension to 200  m/s≤VS30≤3000  m/s

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (2A) ◽  
pp. 977-991
Author(s):  
David M. Boore
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Stochastic Model ◽  
Point Source ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Hard Rock ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Eastern North America ◽  
A Value ◽  
Stress Parameters

Abstract The three sets of ground-motion predictions (GMPs) of Boore (2018; hereafter, B18) are compared with a much larger dataset than was used in deriving the predictions. The B18 GMPs work well for response spectra at periods between ∼0.15 and 4.0 s after an adjustment accounting for a path bias at distances beyond 200 km—this was the maximum distance used to derive the stress parameters on which the simulations in B18 are based. An additional offset adjustment is needed in the B18 predictions for short and long periods. The adjustment at short periods may be because the κ0 of 0.006 s stipulated by the Next Generation Attenuation-East (NGA-East) project to be used in deriving the GMPs is inconsistent with the observations on rock sites. The explanation for the offset adjustment at long periods is not clear, but it could be a combination of limitations of the point-source stochastic model for longer period motions, as well as a decreasing number of observations at longer periods available to constrain the simulations on which the predictions are based. The predictions of B18, developed for very-hard-rock sites (VS30 of 2000 and 3000  m/s), have here been extended down to VS30 values as low as 200  m/s. I find, as have others, that for a given VS30, there is generally less site amplification for central and eastern North America (CENA) than for the active crustal region dataset used for the Boore, Stewart, et al. (2014; hereafter, BSSA14) GMP equations. This might have an impact on conclusions of several previous studies of CENA GMPs that used the site amplifications in BSSA14 in comparing data and predictions. An additional finding is that the κ0 implied by recordings on a subset of stations in the Charlevoix region located on rock (data from these stations were not used in the analysis described earlier) is more consistent with a value near 0.014 s than the 0.006 s value used in B18 and the NGA-East project.

scholarly journals A Procedure to Select Earthquake Time Histories for Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Case Studies of Major Cities in Taiwan

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duruo Huang ◽  
Wenqi Du
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Dynamic Responses ◽  
Motion Time ◽  
Acceleration Time Histories ◽  
Time Histories ◽  
Deterministic Seismic Hazard

Abstract. In performance-based seismic design, ground-motion time histories are needed for analyzing dynamic responses of nonlinear structural systems. However, the number of strong-motion data at design level is often limited. In order to analyze seismic performance of structures, ground-motion time histories need to be either selected from recorded strong-motion database, or numerically simulated using stochastic approaches. In this paper, a detailed procedure to select proper acceleration time histories from the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) database for several cities in Taiwan is presented. Target response spectra are initially determined based on a local ground motion prediction equation under representative deterministic seismic hazard analyses. Then several suites of ground motions are selected for these cities using the Design Ground Motion Library (DGML), a recently proposed interactive ground-motion selection tool. The selected time histories are representatives of the regional seismic hazard, and should be beneficial to earthquake studies when comprehensive seismic hazard assessments and site investigations are yet available. Note that this method is also applicable to site-specific motion selections with the target spectra near the ground surface considering the site effect.

Site classification of Indian strong motion network using response spectra ratios

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumer Chopra ◽  
Vikas Kumar ◽  
Pallabee Choudhury ◽  
R. B. S. Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Site Classification ◽  
Strong Motion Network

NGA-West2 Research Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 973-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousef Bozorgnia ◽  
Norman A. Abrahamson ◽  
Linda Al Atik ◽  
Timothy D. Ancheta ◽  
Gail M. Atkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Research Program ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Earthquake Hazards ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Engineering Research ◽  
Crustal Earthquakes

The NGA-West2 project is a large multidisciplinary, multi-year research program on the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) models for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regions. The research project has been coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), with extensive technical interactions among many individuals and organizations. NGA-West2 addresses several key issues in ground-motion seismic hazard, including updating the NGA database for a magnitude range of 3.0–7.9; updating NGA ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for the “average” horizontal component; scaling response spectra for damping values other than 5%; quantifying the effects of directivity and directionality for horizontal ground motion; resolving discrepancies between the NGA and the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) site amplification factors; analysis of epistemic uncertainty for NGA GMPEs; and developing GMPEs for vertical ground motion. This paper presents an overview of the NGA-West2 research program and its subprojects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document