Cultural Chauvinism

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minabere Ibelema
Keyword(s):  
1982 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Griswold

The February 1981 special issue of the Harvard Educational Review, "Education as Transformation: Identity, Change, and Development, " was "dedicated to those engaged in the struggle for freedom—whether it is waged against political or economic subjugation, illiteracy, racism, or sexual and cultural chauvinism. " Its intent was to focus on the role of education in that struggle. The editors of HER are pleased to present critiques by Wendy Griswold and Jonathan Kozol of "Education as Transformation, "and replies from several of the authors who contributed to that issue.


1981 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
David-Hillel Ruben

As Jon Elster remarked in an earlier review, G. A. Cohen's Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence ‘sets a new standard for Marxist philosophy’. In one way, the praise is too faint. Existing paradigms of continental Marxist philosophy are marred by an absence of careful definition, clear and precise argumentation, and the sort of sustained discussion that is committed to the teasing out of the intellectual difficulties of the author's own position – in short, marred by an absence of those virtues in the attainment of which the philosophy practised in Britain, the United States, and the Scandinavian countries on the whole excels. Cohen would, presumably, agree that this has nothing intrinsically to do with Marx, or Marxism, but in the main arises from the fortuitous coupling of Marxism with continental philosophical fashions. If this sounds like some sort of cultural chauvinism, it also happens to be the truth. So the ‘new’ standards for Marxist philosophy, then, are only the same standards by which it is right to judge all philosophy, wherever it is written, and which any philosophy must pass in order to be accounted good. What is perhaps less faint praise of Cohen is to say that his book is good philosophy (without the qualifying adjective ‘Marxist’). It is an ingenious and imaginative volume, in which precision and detailed attention to argument count for everything.


2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Taylor-Brown ◽  
A. Garcia ◽  
E. Kingson

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-187
Author(s):  
Ugo Dessì

Abstract This article analyzes a few selected case studies from different religious traditions in contemporary Japan to illustrate, first, the active role played by religion in Japan in the creation of hybrid forms and, secondly, the potentiality in two instances to promote cultural chauvinism. The topics explored here are Japanese Buddhism and the issue of human rights, Shintō’s self-representation as a ‘religion of the forest,’ and Kōfuku no Kagaku’s adoption of Theosophical themes. The discourse of human rights found in traditions such as Jōdo Shinshū, Jōdoshū, and Sōtōshū shows how this western idea is made to resonate with religious concepts from the Buddhist tradition, thus making possible a reshaping of local religious identities. While in this case the catalyst in the process is provided by an external source, the recent reshaping of Shintō as a ‘religion of the forest’ may be characterized as a glocalization leaning to ‘native’ sources, in which the ‘native’ religious tradition is subject to a creative reading following the worldwide growing awareness of ecology. Here a tendency to emphasize the superiority of the ‘native’ culture may also be noticed. However, as the case of Kōfuku no Kagaku’s adoption of various Theosophical themes illustrates, also glocalization leaning to external sources may be accompanied by forms of cultural chauvinism.


Author(s):  
Grace E. Lavery

This introductory chapter presents a picture of the Victorian perspective of Japan, the so-called “Other Empire.” Accordingly, it highlights Japan as a precondition for the exquisite aesthetic structure implicit in Immanuel Kant's description of aesthetic judgment. In addition, the chapter shows how Japan is an Other Empire radically threatening the cultural chauvinism of late-Victorian Britain and an eccentric modernity populated by eccentric men. Therefore, it is a model for the subcultural socialities of British aestheticism and a material source of influential writers and artists shaping the emerging aesthetic discourses, usually away from the interests of the white avant-gardes whose achievements are all-too-frequently centered in cultural histories of the period. Japan is an influence, direct and indirect, on the post-structuralist historiographies of theory, and therefore embedded, invisibly, in many of the most cherished categories of cultural analysis.


ASAP/Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-207
Author(s):  
Postcommodity
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew Eisenberg-Holmes

This is a paper written for the University of Toronto and adheres to it's standards. It was written and formatted in Chicago 17th style and uses written and digital scholarly and published sources. One source is the author's own translation of a German text. Otherwise, widely accepted English translations are used (i.e. original English translation of "Mein Kampf"). This paper covers the interrelationship between German colonial thought and German / non-German relationships on the Eastern Front during the Second World War, particularly relations with collaborationist states and Slavic volunteers to the Waffen SS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document