Free-Thought in the Social Sciences (Routledge Revivals)

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Free Thought

Free Thought in the Social Sciences.

Economica ◽  
1926 ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
C. Delisle Burns ◽  
J. A. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Free Thought

Free Thought in the Social Sciences.

1926 ◽  
Vol 36 (143) ◽  
pp. 451
Author(s):  
D. H. Robertson ◽  
J. A. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Free Thought

Free Thought in the Social Sciences

Thought ◽  
1926 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-186
Author(s):  
Moorhouse F. X. Millar ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Free Thought

Free Thought in the Social Sciences.

1926 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 619
Author(s):  
G. E. G. Catlin ◽  
J. A. Hobson
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Free Thought

What Can We Learn From Factorial Surveys About Human Behavior?

Methodology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Knut Petzold ◽  
Tobias Wolbring
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Behavioral Intentions ◽  
Actual Behavior ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Factorial Survey ◽  
Survey Experiment ◽  
Intended Behavior ◽  
The Social ◽  
Survey Experiments ◽  
High Level

Abstract. Factorial survey experiments are increasingly used in the social sciences to investigate behavioral intentions. The measurement of self-reported behavioral intentions with factorial survey experiments frequently assumes that the determinants of intended behavior affect actual behavior in a similar way. We critically investigate this fundamental assumption using the misdirected email technique. Student participants of a survey were randomly assigned to a field experiment or a survey experiment. The email informs the recipient about the reception of a scholarship with varying stakes (full-time vs. book) and recipient’s names (German vs. Arabic). In the survey experiment, respondents saw an image of the same email. This validation design ensured a high level of correspondence between units, settings, and treatments across both studies. Results reveal that while the frequencies of self-reported intentions and actual behavior deviate, treatments show similar relative effects. Hence, although further research on this topic is needed, this study suggests that determinants of behavior might be inferred from behavioral intentions measured with survey experiments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document