scholarly journals Implant loss and crestal bone loss in early loading versus delayed and immediate loading in edentulous mandibles. A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
B. Pardal-Peláez ◽  
J. Flores-Fraile ◽  
J. Pardal-Refoyo ◽  
J. Montero
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immediate Loading ◽  
Early Loading ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss

scholarly journals Bone Loss in Implants Placed at Subcrestal and Crestal Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Palacios-Garzón ◽  
Eugenio Velasco-Ortega ◽  
José López-López
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Control Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
High Survival Rate ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Control

Background: To assess differences in marginal bone loss in implants placed at subcrestal versus crestal level. Methods: An electronic and a manual research of articles written in English from Jaunary 2010 to January 2018 was performed by two independent reviewers. Clinical trials comparing bone loss for implants placed at crestal and subcrestal level were included. Pooled estimates from comparable studies were analyzed using a continuous random-effects model meta-analysis with the objective of assessing differences in crestal bone loss between the two vertical positions. Results: 16 studies were included; 10 studies did not encounter statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to bone loss. Three articles found greater bone loss in subcrestal implants; while 3 found more bone loss in crestal implants. A meta-analysis for randomized control trial (RCT) studies reported an average and non-statistically different crestal bone loss of 0.028 mm. Conclusions: A high survival rate and a comparable bone loss was obtained both for crestal and subcrestal implants’ placement. Quantitative analysis considering a homogenous sample confirms that both vertical positions are equally valid in terms of perimplant bone loss. However, with respect to soft tissue; in presence of a thin tissue; a subcrestal placement of the implant should be preferred as it may reduce the probability for the implant to become exposed in the future and thus avoid the risk of suffering from peri-implant pathologies.

scholarly journals The effect of implant-abutment junction position on crestal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad H. A. Saleh ◽  
Andrea Ravidà ◽  
Fernando Suárez-López del Amo ◽  
Guo-Hao Lin ◽  
Farah Asa'ad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Abutment

Long-Term Effect of Surface Roughness and Patients' Factors on Crestal Bone Loss at Dental Implants. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 372-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Doornewaard ◽  
Véronique Christiaens ◽  
Hugo De Bruyn ◽  
Magnus Jacobsson ◽  
Jan Cosyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Term Effect ◽  
Crestal Bone Loss ◽  
Long Term Effect ◽  
Effect Of Surface
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document