scholarly journals The efficacy of dapagliflozin for type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jian Ma ◽  
Yanhong Zhao ◽  
Huihui Fan ◽  
Jia Liu
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Introduction: The efficacy of dapagliflozin for type 1 diabetes remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the treatment efficacy of dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO and Cochrane library databases through May 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dapagliflozin versus placebo for type 1 diabetes. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Results: Six RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for type 1 diabetes, dapagliflozin treatment shows favorable impact on glycated hemoglobin HbA1c ( standard mean difference SMD=-3.93; 95% confidence interval CI =-4.44 to -3.48; P<0.00001), HbA1c reduction of ≥0.5% (risk ratio RR=1.98; 95% CI=1.65 to 2.39; P<0.00001), and fasting plasma glucose FPG (SMD=-0.93; 95% CI=-1.77 to -0.10; P=0.03). There is no statistical difference of hypo- glycemia (RR=1.09; 95% CI=0.66 to 1.79; P=0.75) or adverse events (RR=1.07; 95% CI=0.96 to 1.20; P=0.20) between two groups, but the incidence of ketone-related events is higher than those in control group (RR=0.28; 95% CI=3.96 to 11.52; P=0.01). Conclusion: Dapagliflozin treatment benefits to reduce HbA1c and FPG for type 1 diabetes. Keywords: Dapagliflozin; type 1 diabetes; glycemic control; randomized controlled trials.

scholarly journals The analgesic evaluation of gabapentin for arthroscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiri Huang ◽  
Hifan Yang ◽  
Zhongliang Su ◽  
Xiaosheng Gao
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Introduction: The efficacy of gabapentin for pain management of arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of gabapentin versus placebo on the postoperative pain intensity of arthroscopy. Methods We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through April 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of gabapentin versus placebo on pain control of arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Results Five RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for arthroscopy, gabapentin remarkably decreases pain scores at 24 h (Std. MD=-0.68; 95% CI=-1.15 to -0.02; P = 0.21), analgesic consumption (Std. MD=-18.24; 95% CI=-24.61 to -11.88; P < 0.00001), nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.84; P = 0.01), but has no obvious influence on pain scores at 6 h (Std. MD=-1.30; 95% CI=-2.92 to 0.31; P = 0.11) or dizziness (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.56 to 2.24; P = 0.75). Conclusions Gabapentin is effective for pain control after arthroscopy.

scholarly journals Effect of Dexmedetomidine For Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengjun Song ◽  
Quan Lu
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the impact of dexmedetomidine for thoracoscopic surgery.Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through September 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dexmedetomidine on thoracoscopic surgery. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.Results: Six RCTs involving 510 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for thoracoscopic surgery, dexmedetomidine results in significantly reduced pain scores (SMD=-1.50; 95% CI=-2.63 to -0.37; P=0.009), anesthetic consumption (SMD=-3.91; 95% CI=-6.76 to -1.05; P=0.007), mean heart rate (SMD=-0.41; 95% CI=-0.65 to -0.18; P=0.0007), and the number of ICU stay (RR=0.39; 95% CI=0.19 to 0.80; P=0.01), but showed no obvious effect on mean blood pressure (SMD=-0.07; 95% CI=-0.45 to 0.31; P=0.72) or hospital stay (SMD=-0.61; 95% CI=-1.30 to 0.08; P=0.08). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine supplementation can substantially improve the analgesic efficacy for thoracoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing the Safety of Dapagliflozin in Type 1 Diabetes Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanta Saha ◽  
Sujata Saha
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background and Purpose: The dapagliflozin’s safety profile in insulin-treated adult type-1 diabetes mellites (T1DM) patients remains poorly explored. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared the risk of all-cause side effects, study discontinuation of participants due to side effects, urinary tract infection (UTI), diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoglycemia between dapagliflozin 10 mg and dapagliflozin 5 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg and placebo, and dapagliflozin 5 mg and placebo.Materials and Methods: Parallel-arm randomized controlled trials juxtaposing the above outcomes between the afore-mentioned interventions were eligible for inclusion in this study and were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Utilizing the Cochrane tool, the risk of bias was assessed in the recruited trials. Finally, by random-effect meta-analysis, each outcome was compared among the above interventions, and the risk ratio was estimated.Results: Four trials of varying length (1-52 weeks) sourcing data from almost 1760 participants from about 32 nations were reviewed. Overall, the trials had a low or unclear risk of bias, and only one was at a high risk of bias.  Compared to the placebo, the risk of side effects was higher in those treated with dapagliflozin 5 mg (RR=1.10; 95% CI=1.02-1.18; p=0.014; I2=0%). UTI risk was less with the 10mg dapagliflozin than its lower dose (RR=0.50; 95% CI=0.32-0.79; p-value=0.003; I2=0%). All the remaining comparisons were statistically not significantly different between the juxtaposed intervention pairs.Conclusion: In contrast to placebo, dapagliflozin 5mg increased the risk of overall adversities in insulin-treated type-1 diabetes, and dapagliflozin 10 mg had a reduced risk of UTI than its 5mg preparation.

scholarly journals Different Dosage Regimens of Eptinezumab for the Treatment of Migraine: A Meta-Analysis from Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeya Yan ◽  
Tao Xue ◽  
Shujun Chen ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Xingyu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Significant Efficacy

Abstract BackgroundMigraine is one of the most common neurological diseases around the world and calcitonin gene-related peptide（CGRP）plays an important role in its pathophysiology. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies blocking the CGRP ligand or receptor in episodic and chronic migraine. ObjectiveThe objective of our study is implementing a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for the treatment of migraine compared with placebo.MethodWe searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which were performed to evaluate eptinezumab versus placebo for migraine up to September 2020. The data was assessed by Review Manager 5.3 software. The risk ratio (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were analyzed using dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes respectively with a random effect model.ResultWe collected 2,739 patients from 4 RCTs: the primary endpoint of efficacy was the change from baseline to week 12 in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs). We found that eptinezumab (30mg，100mg，300mg) led to a significant reduction in MMDs (P=0.0001,P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001) during 12 weeks compared with placebo, especially with 300mg. For the safety, we compared and concluded the treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of the 4 RCTs. This indicated no evident statistical difference between eptinezumab and placebo.ConclusionsIn the present study, we found that eptinezumab is safe and has significant efficacy in the treatment of migraine, especially the dose of 300 mg.

scholarly journals Ketamine Supplementation To Bupivacaine For Knee Arthroscopy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Li ◽  
Zhibo Xiao ◽  
Liuli Chen ◽  
Songli Pan
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Knee Arthroscopy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Scores

Abstract Introduction: The efficacy of ketamine supplementation to bupivacaine for pain management of knee arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of ketamine supplementation to bupivacaine on the postoperative pain intensity of knee arthroscopy.Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through July 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of ketamine supplementation to bupivacaine on pain control of knee arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.Results: Four RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for knee arthroscopy, ketamine supplementation remarkably decreases pain scores at 30 min (SMD=-0.98; 95% CI=-1.42 to -0.55; P<0.00001) and number of additional analgesics (OR=0.27; 95% CI=0.10 to 0.71; P=0.008), but reveals no significant impact on pain scores at 1 h (SMD=-1.34; 95% CI=-3.42 to 0.73; P=0.20), pain scores at 6 h (SMD=-0.33; 95% CI=-1.39 to 0.72; P=0.53), time of first analgesic requirement (SMD=1.27; 95% CI=-0.95 to 3.49; P=0.26) or additional analgesic consumption (SMD=-2.25; 95% CI=-5.89 to 1.40; P=0.23). Conclusions: Ketamine supplementation may improve the pain control when in combination with bupivacaine for knee arthroscopy.

scholarly journals The effect of magnesium added to bupivacaine for arthroscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weineng Xiang ◽  
Lin Jiang ◽  
Langtao Shi ◽  
Chengming Jiang ◽  
Yun Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Analgesic Requirement ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Introduction The analgesic efficacy of magnesium sulphate added to bupivacaine for arthroscopy remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of magnesium sulphate in combination with bupivacaine for arthroscopy. Methods We searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through July 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of magnesium sulphate plus bupivacaine versus bupivacaine for arthroscopy. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Results Six RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with bupivacaine for arthroscopy, combination analgesia using magnesium plus bupivacaine was associated with significantly prolonged duration of analgesia (SMD=0.93; 95% CI=0.27 to 1.60; P=0.006) and first time to analgesic requirement (SMD=196.57; 95% CI=13.90 to 379.24; P=0.03), reduced pain scores (SMD=-1.71; 95% CI=-2.96 to -0.46; P=0.007) and analgesic consumption (SMD=-1.04; 95% CI=-1.49 to -0.60; P<0.00001), but showed no remarkable influence on nausea or vomiting (OR=1.54; 95% CI=0.60 to 3.97; P=0.37). Conclusions Magnesium sulphate added to bupivacaine may significantly improve the analgesic efficacy for arthroscopy.

The Effects of Folate Supplementation on Diabetes Biomarkers Among Patients with Metabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 93-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Akbari ◽  
Reza Tabrizi ◽  
Kamran B. Lankarani ◽  
Seyed Taghi Heydari ◽  
Maryam Karamali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Metabolic Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Model Assessment ◽  
Folate Supplementation ◽  
Randomized Controlled

AbstractAlthough several studies have evaluated the effect of folate supplementation on diabetes biomarkers among patients with metabolic diseases, findings are inconsistent. This review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to summarize the evidence on the effects of folate supplementation on diabetes biomarkers among patients with metabolic diseases. Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to 1 September 2017 were searched. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias of included studies. Heterogeneity was measured with a Q-test and with I2 statistics. Data were pooled by using the fix or random-effect model based on the heterogeneity test results and expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 763 participants were included in the final analysis. The current meta-analysis showed folate supplementation among patients with metabolic diseases significantly decreased insulin (SMD –1.28; 95% CI, –1.99, –0.56) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (SMD –1.28; 95% CI, –1.99, –0.56). However, folate supplementation did not affect fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SMD –0.30; 95% CI, –0.63, 0.02) and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (SMD –0.29; 95% CI, –0.61, 0.03). The results of this meta-analysis study demonstrated that folate supplementation may result in significant decreases in insulin levels and HOMA-IR score, but does not affect FPG and HbA1c levels among patients with metabolic diseases.

scholarly journals Different dosage regimens of Eptinezumab for the treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeya Yan ◽  
Tao Xue ◽  
Shujun Chen ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Xingyu Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Standard Mean Difference ◽  
Significant Efficacy

Abstract Background Migraine is one of the most common neurological diseases around the world and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in its pathophysiology. Therefore, in the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies blocking the CGRP ligand or receptor in episodic and chronic migraine. Objective The objective of our study is implementing a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab for the treatment of migraine compared with placebo. Method We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which were performed to evaluate eptinezumab versus placebo for migraine up to September 2020. The data was assessed by Review Manager 5.3 software. The risk ratio (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were analyzed using dichotomous outcomes and continuous outcomes respectively with a random effect model. Result We collected 2739 patients from 4 RCTs: the primary endpoint of efficacy was the change from baseline to week 12 in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs). We found that eptinezumab (30 mg, 100 mg, 300 mg) led to a significant reduction in MMDs (P = 0.0001,P < 0.00001, P < 0.00001) during 12 weeks compared with placebo, especially with 300 mg. For the safety, we compared and concluded the treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of the 4 RCTs. This indicated no evident statistical difference between eptinezumab and placebo. Conclusions In the present study, we found that eptinezumab is safe and has significant efficacy in the treatment of migraine, especially the dose of 300 mg.

scholarly journals The Effect of Virtual Reality on Preoperative Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 3151
Author(s):  
Chang-Hoon Koo ◽  
Jin-Woo Park ◽  
Jung-Hee Ryu ◽  
Sung-Hee Han
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Preoperative Anxiety ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Virtual reality (VR), a technology that provides a stimulated sensory experience, has recently been implemented in various fields of medicine. Several studies have investigated the efficacy of VR on preoperative anxiety. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to validate whether VR could relieve preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing surgery. Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of VR on preoperative anxiety. The primary outcome was defined as the preoperative anxiety scores. We estimated the effect size using the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effect model. Ultimately, 10 RCTs, with a total of 813 patients, were included in the final analysis. Preoperative anxiety was significantly lower in the VR group than in the control group (SMD −0.64, 95% CI −1.08 to −0.20, p = 0.004). In a subgroup analysis, the preoperative anxiety scores were lower in the VR group than in the control group in pediatric patients (SMD −0.71, 95% CI −1.14 to −0.27, p = 0.002), whereas a significant difference was not observed between the two groups in adult patients (p = 0.226). The results of this meta-analysis indicated that VR could decrease preoperative anxiety, especially in pediatric patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document