scholarly journals Treatment and Follow-up in a Case with Diazoxide Treatment-Resistant Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycaemia

2017 ◽  
pp. 245-248
Author(s):  
Damla Gökşen ◽  
Nurhan Murat ◽  
Özge Altun Köroğlu ◽  
Burçe Emine Yaşar ◽  
Samim Özen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Hyperinsulinemic Hypoglycaemia

scholarly journals Experience with protein A-immunoadsorption in treatment-resistant adult immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 2237-2245 ◽  
Author(s):  
HW Snyder ◽  
SK Cochran ◽  
JP Balint ◽  
JH Bertram ◽  
A Mittelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Protein A ◽  
Staphylococcal Protein A ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Specific Serum ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Acute Increase

Abstract Extracorporeal immunoadsorption of plasma to remove IgG and circulating immune complexes (CIC) was evaluated as a therapy for adults with treatment-resistant immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Seventy-two patients with initial platelet counts less than 50,000/microL who had failed at least two other therapies were studied. They received an average of six treatments of 0.25 to 2.0 L plasma per procedure over a 2- to 3-week period using columns of staphylococcal protein A-silica (PROSORBA immunoadsorption treatment columns; IMRE Corp, Seattle, WA). The treatments caused an acute increase in the platelet count to greater than 100,000/microL in 18 patients and to 50,000 to 100,000/microL in 15 patients. The median time to response was 2 weeks. Responses were transient (less than 1 month duration) in seven of those patients (10%), but no additional relapses were reported over a follow- up period of up to 26 months (mean of 8 months). Clinical responses were associated with significant decreases in specific serum platelet autoantibodies (including anti-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa), platelet- associated Ig, and CIC. Thirty percent of treatments were associated with transient mild to moderate side effects usually presenting as a hypersensitivity-type reaction. Continued administration of failed therapies for ITP, which always included low-dose corticosteroids (less than or equal to 30 mg/d), had no demonstrable influence on the effectiveness of immunoadsorption treatment but did depress the incidence and severity of side effects. The degree of effectiveness of protein A immunoadsorption therapy in patients with treatment-resistant ITP is promising and further controlled studies in this patient population are warranted.

scholarly journals One-year randomized trial comparing virtual reality-assisted therapy to cognitive–behavioral therapy for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Dellazizzo ◽  
Stéphane Potvin ◽  
Kingsada Phraxayavong ◽  
Alexandre Dumais
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations

AbstractThe gold-standard cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) for psychosis offers at best modest effects. With advances in technology, virtual reality (VR) therapies for auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH), such as AVATAR therapy (AT) and VR-assisted therapy (VRT), are amid a new wave of relational approaches that may heighten effects. Prior trials have shown greater effects of these therapies on AVH up to a 24-week follow-up. However, no trial has compared them to a recommended active treatment with a 1-year follow-up. We performed a pilot randomized comparative trial evaluating the short- and long-term efficacy of VRT over CBT for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to VRT (n = 37) or CBT (n = 37). Clinical assessments were administered before and after each intervention and at follow-up periods up to 12 months. Between and within-group changes in psychiatric symptoms were assessed using linear mixed-effects models. Short-term findings showed that both interventions produced significant improvements in AVH severity and depressive symptoms. Although results did not show a statistically significant superiority of VRT over CBT for AVH, VRT did achieve larger effects particularly on overall AVH (d = 1.080 for VRT and d = 0.555 for CBT). Furthermore, results suggested a superiority of VRT over CBT on affective symptoms. VRT also showed significant results on persecutory beliefs and quality of life. Effects were maintained up to the 1-year follow-up. VRT highlights the future of patient-tailored approaches that may show benefits over generic CBT for voices. A fully powered single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing VRT to CBT is underway.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and current treatment patterns of treatment-resistant depression in Scotland: a CPRD study

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S334-S334
Author(s):  
Timothy Ming ◽  
Tom Denee ◽  
Gemma Scott ◽  
Joachim Morrens ◽  
Christopher Weatherburn
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Treatment Resistant Depression ◽  
Augmentation Therapy ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
First Line ◽  
Resistant Depression

AimsTo assess the incidence and treatments currently used in clinical practice for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in Scotland.BackgroundPatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have not responded to at least two successive antidepressant (AD) treatments in a single episode are described as having Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD). Epidemiological data on TRD in Scotland is lacking. Furthermore, there is no data to our knowledge on therapies prescribed in Scottish clinical practice to treat TRD.MethodA retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) medical records. Adult patients were indexed on AD prescription, requiring MDD diagnosis within 90 days, from Jan 2011-May 2018 with 360-day baseline and 180-day minimum follow-up periods. Failure of ≥2 adequate oral AD regimens following indexing constituted TRD classification. Incidence rates of MDD and TRD (within the MDD cohort) and treatment lines following TRD classification were derived.ResultThe analysis included 20,059 patients with MDD (mean age 44 years, 63% female, median follow-up 59 months); 1,374 (6.8%) were classified as TRD. Median time-to-TRD classification was 25 months. The incidence rate of MDD was 15.9 per 1,000 patient-years and for TRD was 14.7 per 1,000 MDD-patient-years. For all first four post-TRD treatment lines, SSRI monotherapy was the most commonly prescribed therapy, followed by combination (dual/triple) therapy and augmentation therapy (at least one oral AD supplemented with lithium, an antipsychotic or an anticonvulsant therapy). At first-line of TRD treatment, 1,050 (76.4%) patients received monotherapy AD, 212 (15.4%) received combination AD therapy and 112 (8.2%) received augmentation therapy. The most common monotherapy treatments at first-line TRD were sertraline (15.6%), mirtazapine (13.8%), fluoxetine (12.2%) and venlafaxine (11.6%). Among combination therapies, mirtazapine, venlafaxine, sertraline and amitriptyline were frequently used. Among the TRD and MDD cohort, no somatic treatments were coded in CPRD, although the use of these treatments was likely underestimated.ConclusionMonotherapy AD treatment was the most common therapy type for all four post-TRD treatment lines. These data support the need for new treatments that can achieve and maintain therapeutic response, and avoid continuous cycling through similar AD therapies.This study was sponsored by Janssen Cilag Ltd.

Abstract 094: Predicting the Risk of Apparent Treatment Resistant Hypertension: A Retrospective, Longitudinal, Cohort Study in an Urban Hypertension Referral Clinic Setting

Hypertension ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G Buhnerkempe ◽  
Albert Botchway ◽  
Carlos Nolasco-Morales ◽  
Vivek Prakash ◽  
Lowell Hedquist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Resistant Hypertension ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Index Visit ◽  
Drug Classes

Background: Apparent treatment resistant hypertension (aTRH) is associated with increased prevalence of secondary hypertension and adverse pressure-related clinical outcomes. We previously showed that cross-sectional prevalence estimates of aTRH are lower than its true prevalence as patients with uncontrolled hypertension undergoing intensification/optimization of therapy will, over time, increasingly satisfy diagnostic criteria for aTRH. Methods: aTRH (SBP and/or DBP at or above a clinically defined goal BP [140/90, 130/85, 130/80, or 125/75 mmHg] over two consecutive office visits when on ≥ 3 antihypertensive drug classes, including a diuretic; or SBP and DBP below goal when on ≥ 4 drug classes, including a diuretic) was assessed in an urban referral hypertension clinic in 924 patients ≥ 30 years old (57.7 ± 12.6) with at least two follow-up visits over 240 days. Patients were mostly African-American (86%; 795/924) and female (65%; 601/924). A minority (28.7%; 265/924) were taking diuretics at their index visit, and analyses were stratified according to this use. Risk for aTRH was estimated using logistic regression with patient characteristics at index visit as predictors. Performance of this risk score at discriminating aTRH status over follow-up was assessed using AUC and was internally validated using bootstrapping. Results: Amongst those on diuretics, 80/265 (30.2%) developed aTRH; the risk score discriminated well (AUC = 0.79, bootstrapped 95% CI [0.73, 0.84]). In patients not on a diuretic, 151/659 (22.9%) developed aTRH, and the risk score showed moderate, but significantly lower, discriminative ability (AUC = 0.71 [0.66, 0.74]; p < 0.001). In the diuretic and non-diuretic cohorts, 43/265 (16.2%) and 101/265 (38.1%) of patients, respectively, had estimated risks for development of aTRH < 10%. Of these low-risk patients, 42/43 (97.7%) and 97/101 (96.0%) did not develop aTRH (negative predictive value, diuretics – 0.95 [0.93, 1.00], no diuretics – 0.96 [0.91, 1.00]). Conclusions: We created a novel clinical score that discriminates well between those who will and will not develop aTRH, especially amongst those taking diuretics initially. Irrespective of diuretic treatment status, a low risk score had very high negative predictive value.

scholarly journals Adjunct ketamine treatment of depression in treatment‐resistant schizophrenia patients is unsatisfactory in pilot and secondary follow‐up studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanjun Zhuo ◽  
Xiaodong Lin ◽  
Hongjun Tian ◽  
Sha Liu ◽  
Haiman Bian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Resistant ◽  
Treatment Of Depression ◽  
Follow Up Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document