Upper Neck Response of the Belt and Air Bag Restrained 50th Percentile Hybrid III Dummy in the USA's New Car Assessment Program

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Park ◽  
Richard M. Morgan ◽  
James R. Hackney ◽  
Susan Partyka ◽  
Michael Kleinberger ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Kang ◽  
Venkatesh Agaram ◽  
Guy Nusholtz ◽  
Gregory Kostyniuk
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Sances

Abstract Human injury tolerance is difficult because of physical differences between humans and animals, dummies and cadaver tissue. Human volunteer testing has been done but at sub injurious levels (Stapp, 1986 and Ewing, 1972). Considerable biomechanical engineering and tissue studies exist for the adult human cadaver however little is available for the pediatric population (Kumaresan, 1999). A number of dummies have recently been made available principally for airbag testing to bridge the gap between the 50 percentile hybrid III male dummy and the 95 percentile male dummy. (Kleinberger. 1998) The air bag dummies including the 12-month old CRABI dummy, 3-year old Hybrid III dummy, 6-year old Hybrid III dummy, the Hybrid III small female, Hybrid II mid-size male and 95 percentile large male are discussed.


Author(s):  
Elham Sahraei Esfahani ◽  
Damoon Soudbakhsh ◽  
Kennerly Digges

New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) gives star ratings to the vehicles based on their crashworthiness. The program uses results of crash tests performed with 50% male HYBRID III dummies in the driver and right front passenger seats and gives separate star ratings for the driver and right front passenger positions. These star ratings are available from the safer car website [1], and are perceived as an indicator of general safety of the vehicles for people trying to purchase a vehicle. A one-star rating would show the lowest, and five-star would be the highest safety ranking. As the NCAP star ratings of the vehicles have improved over years, front occupant protection has improved as well; however, recent studies have shown that rear occupants are less protected in newer model years of vehicles [2]. Safety of rear occupants is not evaluated with the NCAP program. In this paper an attempt is made to verify whether the NCAP scores can show the level of protection provided to the rear occupants or not.


1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Melvin ◽  
John D. Horsch ◽  
Joseph D. McCleary ◽  
Laura C. Wideman ◽  
Jack L. Jensen ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger A. Saul ◽  
Stanley H. Backaitis ◽  
Michael S. Beebe ◽  
Lisa S. Ore
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document