A One-Dimensional Transient Compressible Flow Model for Cooling Airflow Rate Computation

1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward C. Chiang ◽  
George P. C. Huang ◽  
Zintai Chang ◽  
John H. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Compressible Flow ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Airflow Rate ◽  
One Dimensional

Measurements of Blowdown Thrust Loading in Natural Gas Facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Botros ◽  
H. Charette ◽  
M. Martens ◽  
M. Beckel ◽  
G. Szuch
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Natural Gas ◽  
Compressible Flow ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Stagnation Pressure ◽  
Flow Meters ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Pressure Losses ◽  
Modeling Approach

Abstract The thrust loading on a vertical blowdown stack during a natural gas blowdown was investigated using a combined experimental and modeling approach. A gravimetric vessel initially at 4000 kPa-g was blown down through two geometrically different stack assemblies. Thrust loads were measured using a dynamic weigh scale typically used for gravimetric calibration of gas flow meters. A one-dimensional (1D) compressible flow model, calibrated using the experimental data, revealed stagnation pressure losses at the entrance to the riser, resulting in lower thrust loads. A comparison between thrust loading obtained from the measurements and the 1D compressible flow model is presented. This work shows that the analytical flow model predicts the blowdown thrust loads within ±30%.

A ONE-DIMENSIONAL TWO-PHASE FLOW MODEL AND EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION FOR A FLASHING VISCOUS LIQUID IN A SPLASH PLATE NOZZLE

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 795-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika P. Jarvinen ◽  
A. E. P. Kankkunen ◽  
R. Virtanen ◽  
P. H. Miikkulainen ◽  
V. P. Heikkila
Keyword(s):  
Viscous Liquid ◽  
Experimental Validation ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional

One-dimensional numerical study of compressible flow ejector

AIAA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 1469-1472
Author(s):  
S. Han ◽  
J. Peddieson
Keyword(s):  
Compressible Flow ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
One Dimensional

An Evaluation of the Average Flow Model [1] for Surface Roughness Effects in Lubrication

1980 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Teale ◽  
A. O. Lebeck
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Roughness Effects ◽  
Important Conclusion ◽  
Average Flow ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Dimensional Flow ◽  
Two Dimensional Flow ◽  
Average Flow Model

The average flow model presented by Patir and Cheng [1] is evaluated. First, it is shown that the choice of grid used in the average flow model influences the results. The results presented are different from those given by Patir and Cheng. Second, it is shown that the introduction of two-dimensional flow greatly reduces the effect of roughness on flow. Results based on one-dimensional flow cannot be relied upon for two-dimensional problems. Finally, some average flow factors are given for truncated rough surfaces. These can be applied to partially worn surfaces. The most important conclusion reached is that an even closer examination of the average flow concept is needed before the results can be applied with confidence to lubrication problems.

scholarly journals Modelling sedimentation–consolidation in the framework of a one-dimensional two-phase flow model

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Chauchat ◽  
Sylvain Guillou ◽  
Damien Pham Van Bang ◽  
Kim Dan Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Flow Model ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
One Dimensional

Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Combustion in Quasi One-Dimensional Flow

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Gary Yip
Keyword(s):  
Flow Model ◽  
Cone Angle ◽  
Initial Pressure ◽  
Supersonic Combustion ◽  
Propulsion Systems ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Hypersonic Propulsion ◽  
Dimensional Flow ◽  
Conical Shock ◽  
Shock System

Abstract Supersonic combustion induced by a two-shock system has been studied using a chemical nonequilibrium, quasi one-dimensional flow model. The combustion of stoichiometric, premixed H2-air is described by a chemistry model which consists of 11 species and 28 reactions. The freestream Mach numbers used in this calculations are 8, 10 and 12. The initial pressure is 0.01 atm and temperature 300 K. The first of the two shocks is a conical shock and the second is its reflection. Supersonic combustion has been predicted to occur at combustor pressures between 0.8 and 2.9 atmospheres, and temperatures between 1500 and 3000 K. The Mach number of the flow in the combustor is between 1.7 and 4. These combustor conditions are typical of the future hypersonic propulsion systems. The results also show the changes in the composition of the flow during the induction and heat release phases. The two-shock system is assumed to be generated by a cone. For Mach 8, 10 and 12, the minimum cone angle for generating a strong enough two-shock system to induce supersonic combustion has also been identified.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Vertical Producing Degree of Commingled Production via Waterflooding for Multilayer Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoirs

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Shen ◽  
Linsong Cheng ◽  
Qiang Sun ◽  
Shijun Huang
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Dynamic Method ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Oil Reservoirs ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
One Dimensional ◽  
Heavy Oil Reservoirs ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Important Form

Recently, commingling production has been widely used for the development of offshore heavy oil reservoirs with multilayers. However, the differences between layers in terms of reservoir physical properties, oil properties and pressure have always resulted in interlayer interference, which makes it more difficult to evaluate the producing degree of commingled production. Based on the Buckley–Leverett theory, this paper presents two theoretical models, a one-dimensional linear flow model and a planar radial flow model, for water-flooded multilayer reservoirs. Through the models, this paper establishes a dynamic method to evaluate seepage resistance, sweep efficiency and recovery percent and then conducts an analysis with field data. The result indicates the following: (1) the dynamic difference in seepage resistance is an important form of interlayer interference during the commingled production of an offshore multilayer reservoir; (2) the difference between commingled production and separated production is small within a certain range of permeability ratio or viscosity ratio, but separated production should be adopted when the ratio exceeds a certain value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document