Development of Pole Side Impact Sled Test Method using Multiple Actuators for EuroNCAP

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Kinoshita ◽  
Naoki Shigeno ◽  
Tatsuya Fukushima ◽  
Hermann Steffan
2011 ◽  
Vol 301-303 ◽  
pp. 1249-1253
Author(s):  
Zhi Xin Liu ◽  
Lei Lou ◽  
Yun Sheng Yang

Frontal sled test is an important platform that widely employed to predict and assess changes in overall safety performance as vehicle structural and occupant restraint parameters are varied. In this paper, a characteristic door intrusion velocity pulse in side impact was analyzed and a set of side test jig was designed, which realized one kind of simplified side impact sled test method. Then we compared the injury values of the side impact dummy, the result showed that there existed good correlation between sled test and full-vehicle test.


2013 ◽  
Vol 333-335 ◽  
pp. 2101-2104
Author(s):  
Zhi Xin Liu ◽  
Yu Bing Zhang ◽  
Ming Jiang Wei ◽  
Yue Zhang

Although accident analysis shows that side impact accidents continue to be dangerous for children in cars, the majority technical regulations of Child Restraint Systems (CRS) are focused on the crash performance under the frontal and rear impacts and do not include a side impact test, the main reason is that no good method to test side impact performance of CRS has been agreed on yet in the world. In this paper one side impact test method based on double sled concept is presented and realized. And several CRS models are tested; injury response values are measured from child dummy. It is observed that the sled buck concept is repeatable and able to distinguish preliminarily between CRS models.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnakanth Aekbote ◽  
Srinivasan Sundararajan ◽  
Joseph A. Prater ◽  
Joe E. Abramczyk

Abstract A sled based test method for simulating full-scale EEVC (European) side impact crash test is described in this paper. Both the dummy (Eurosid-1) and vehicle structural responses were simulated, and validated with the full-scale crash tests. The effect of various structural configurations such as foam filled structures, material changes, rocker and b-pillar reinforcements, advanced door design concepts, on vehicle performance can be evaluated using this methodology at the early stages of design. In this approach, an actual EEVC honeycomb barrier and a vehicle body-in-white with doors were used. The under-hood components (engine, transmission, radiator, etc.), tires, and the front/rear suspensions were not included in the vehicle assembly, but they were replaced by lumped masses (by adding weight) in the front and rear of the vehicle, to maintain the overall vehicle weight. The vehicle was mounted on the sled by means of a supporting frame at the front/rear suspension attachments, and was allowed to translate in the impact direction only. At the start of the simulation, an instrumented Eurosid-1 dummy was seated inside the vehicle, while maintaining the same h-point location, chest angle, and door-to-dummy lateral distance, as in a full-scale crash test. The EEVC honeycomb barrier was mounted on another sled, and care was taken to ensure that weight, and the relative impact location to the vehicle, was maintained the same as in full-scale crash test. The Barrier impacted the stationary vehicle at an initial velocity of approx. 30 mph. The MDB and the vehicle were allowed to slide for about 20 inches from contact, before they were brought to rest. Accelerometers were mounted on the door inner sheet metal and b-pillar, rocker, seat cross-members, seats, and non-struck side rocker. The Barrier was instrumented with six load cells to monitor the impact force at different sections, and an accelerometer for deceleration measurement. The dummy, vehicle, and the Barrier responses showed good correlation when compared to full-scale crash tests. The test methodology was also used in assessing the performance/crashworthiness of various sub-system designs of the side structure (A-pillar, B-pillar, door, rocker, seat cross-members, etc.) of a passenger car. This paper concerns itself with the development and validation of the test methodology only, as the study of various side structure designs and evaluations are beyond the scope of this paper.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (09n11) ◽  
pp. 1766-1773
Author(s):  
YOUNGHAN YOUN ◽  
JEONG-SEO KOO

The complete evaluation of the side vehicle structure and the occupant protection is only possible by means of the full scale side impact crash test. But, auto part manufacturers such as door trim makers can not conduct the test especially when the vehicle is under the developing process. The main objective of this study is to obtain the design guidelines by a simple component level impact test. The relationship between the target absorption energy and impactor speed were examined using the energy absorbed by the door trim. Since each different vehicle type required different energy levels on the door trim. A simple impact test method was developed to estimate abdominal injury by measuring reaction force of the impactor. The reaction force will be converted to a certain level of the energy by the proposed formula. The target of absorption energy for door trim only and the impact speed of simple impactor are derived theoretically based on the conservation of energy. With calculated speed of dummy and the effective mass of abdomen, the energy allocated in the abdomen area of door trim was calculated. The impactor speed can be calculated based on the equivalent energy of door trim absorbed during the full crash test. With the proposed design procedure for the door trim by a simple impact test method was demonstrated to evaluate the abdominal injury. This paper describes a study that was conducted to determine sensitivity of several design factors for reducing abdominal injury values using the matrix of orthogonal array method. In conclusion, with theoretical considerations and empirical test data, the main objective, standardization of door trim design using the simple impact test method was established.


2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Aekbote ◽  
L. Zhao ◽  
M. Maltarich ◽  
J. Cheng ◽  
C.C. Chou ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Fukushima ◽  
Masafumi Shitamichi ◽  
Toshikazu Torigaki ◽  
Hidetoshi Sokusai ◽  
Masato Nishi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document