Large Eddy Simulation of a Motored Single-Cylinder Engine Using System Simulation to Define Boundary Conditions: Methodology and Validation

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 948-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecile Pera ◽  
Christian Angelberger
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
System Simulation ◽  
Single Cylinder ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Single Cylinder Engine ◽  
Large Eddy

A Method of Measuring Turbulent Flow Structures With Particle Image Velocimetry and Incorporating Into Boundary Conditions of Large Eddy Simulations

2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Puxuan Li ◽  
Steve J. Eckels ◽  
Garrett W. Mann ◽  
Ning Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Particle Image ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Piv Measurement ◽  
Image Velocimetry ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Inlet Conditions

The setup of inlet conditions for a large eddy simulation (LES) is a complex and important problem. Normally, there are two methods to generate the inlet conditions for LES, i.e., synthesized turbulence methods and precursor simulation methods. This study presents a new method for determining inlet boundary conditions of LES using particle image velocimetry (PIV). LES shows sensitivity to inlet boundary conditions in the developing region, and this effect can even extend into the fully developed region of the flow. Two kinds of boundary conditions generated from PIV data, i.e., steady spatial distributed inlet (SSDI) and unsteady spatial distributed inlet (USDI), are studied. PIV provides valuable field measurement, but special care is needed to estimate turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation rate for SSDI. Correlation coefficients are used to analyze the autocorrelation of the PIV data. Different boundary conditions have different influences on LES, and their advantages and disadvantages for turbulence prediction and static pressure prediction are discussed in the paper. Two kinds of LES with different subgrid turbulence models are evaluated: namely dynamic Smagorinsky–Lilly model (Lilly model) and wall modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES model). The performances of these models for flow prediction in a square duct are presented. Furthermore, the LES results are compared with PIV measurement results and Reynolds-stress model (RSM) results at a downstream location for validation.

scholarly journals Experimental study of wall boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation

2001 ◽  
Vol 446 ◽  
pp. 309-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
IVAN MARUSIC ◽  
GARY J. KUNKEL ◽  
FERNANDO PORTÉ-AGEL
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Wall Shear Stress ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Streamwise Velocity ◽  
New Model ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

An experimental investigation was conducted to study the wall boundary condition for large-eddy simulation (LES) of a turbulent boundary layer at Rθ = 3500. Most boundary condition formulations for LES require the specification of the instantaneous filtered wall shear stress field based upon the filtered velocity field at the closest grid point above the wall. Three conventional boundary conditions are tested using simultaneously obtained filtered wall shear stress and streamwise and wall-normal velocities, at locations nominally within the log region of the flow. This was done using arrays of hot-film sensors and X-wire probes. The results indicate that models based on streamwise velocity perform better than those using the wall-normal velocity, but overall significant discrepancies were found for all three models. A new model is proposed which gives better agreement with the shear stress measured at the wall. The new model is also based on the streamwise velocity but is formulated so as to be consistent with ‘outer-flow’ scaling similarity of the streamwise velocity spectra. It is therefore expected to be more generally applicable over a larger range of Reynolds numbers at any first-grid position within the log region of the boundary layer.

Large eddy simulation of forest canopy flow for wildland fire modeling

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1534-1544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Mueller ◽  
William Mell ◽  
Albert Simeoni
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Periodic Boundary ◽  
Forest Canopy ◽  
Wildland Fire ◽  
Periodic Boundary Conditions ◽  
Static Case ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Statistics ◽  
Large Eddy

Large eddy simulation (LES) based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulators have obtained increasing attention in the wildland fire research community, as these tools allow the inclusion of important driving physics. However, due to the complexity of the models, individual aspects must be isolated and tested rigorously to ensure meaningful results. As wind is a driving force that can significantly dictate the behavior of a wildfire, the simulation of wind is studied in the context of a particular LES CFD model, the Wildland–urban interface Fire Dynamics Simulator (WFDS). As WFDS has yet to be tested extensively with regard to wind flow within and above forest canopies, a study of its ability to do so is carried out. First, three simulations are conducted using periodic boundary conditions. Two of these assume a spatially heterogeneous forest and one models wind downstream of a canopy edge. Second, two simulations are conducted with specified “inflow” conditions using two inflow profiles: one static and one dynamic (driven by a precursor simulation). Using periodic boundary conditions, the model is found to generate profiles of mean velocity and turbulent statistics that are representative of experimental measurements. The dynamic inflow scenario is found to perform better than the static case.

Large Eddy Simulation of a jet flow with a suction/ejection system using immersed boundary conditions

2010 ◽  
Vol 98 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 618-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Salinas-Vázquez ◽  
W. Vicente ◽  
C. González-Rodríguez ◽  
E. Barrios-Bonilla ◽  
A. Espinosa-Gayosso
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Jet Flow ◽  
Immersed Boundary ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document