Design and Certification of the Extravehicular Activity Mobility Unit (EMU) Water Processing Jumper

Author(s):  
Laurie J. Peterson ◽  
Derek J. Neumeyer ◽  
John F. Lewis
1988 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Shepherd

While the debate continues about the safety and applicability of heads-up displays (HUDs) and helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) in the aeronautical environment (as demonstrated in the July, October, and November 1987 issues of the Human Factors Society Bulletin), a voice-controlled HMD is being designed as the core of the information system for the new Space Station Extravehicular Mobility Unit (EMU). This paper describes the human factors issues that suggest the HMD will be a safe and desirable tool for Space Station extravehicular activity (EVA). Also, it briefly outlines a Macintosh-based voice-interactive rapid prototyping system that is being used at the NASA Johnson Space Center for simulating and evaluating the HMD's ability to enhance astronaut productivity in the EVA setting.


Author(s):  
Kevin D. Hoffman ◽  
James L. Hyde ◽  
Eric L. Christiansen ◽  
Dana M. Lear

Abstract A well-known hazard associated with exposure to the space environment is the risk of vehicle failure due to an impact from a micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) particle. Among the vehicles of importance to NASA is the extravehicular mobility unit (EMU) “spacesuit” used while performing a US extravehicular activity (EVA). An EMU impact is of great concern as a large leak could prevent an astronaut from safely reaching the airlock in time resulting in a loss of life. For this reason, a risk assessment is provided to the EVA office at the Johnson Space Center (JSC) prior to certification of readiness for each US EVA. This paper will detail the methodology for an ISS EVA risk assessment. The soft goods regions (multilayer fabric over a pressurized bladder) are the highest contributors of risk for an ISS EVA. The gloves, due to reduced fabric layers to allow for improved dexterity, carry the highest risk per area. ISS EVA risk can be reduced by minimizing the exposure of the front of the suit and gloves to the orbital debris flux.


1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Schultz ◽  
R. Scott Millican ◽  
Robert R. Kain

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document