Effects of Fuel Parameters and Diffusion Flame Lift-Off on Soot Formation in a Heavy-Duty DI Diesel Engine

Author(s):  
Mark P. Musculus ◽  
John E. Dec ◽  
Dale R. Tree
Author(s):  
Meng Tang ◽  
Yuanjiang Pei ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Michael Traver ◽  
David Cleary ◽  
...  

Gasoline compression ignition (GCI) engine technology has shown the potential to achieve high fuel efficiency with low criteria pollutant emissions. In order to guide the design and optimization of GCI combustion, it is essential to develop high-fidelity simulation tools. Building on the previous work in computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations of spray combustion, this work focuses on predicting the soot emissions in a constant-volume vessel representative of heavy-duty diesel engine applications for an ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and a high reactivity (Research Octane Number 60) gasoline, and comparing the soot evolution characteristics of the two fuels. Simulations were conducted using both Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence models. Extensive model validations were performed against the experimental soot emissions data for both fuels. It was found that the simulation results using the LES turbulence model agreed better with the measured ignition delays and liftoff lengths than the RANS turbulence model. In addition, two soot models were evaluated in the current study, including an empirical two-step soot formation and oxidation model, and a detailed soot model that involves poly-aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) chemistry. Validations showed that the separation of the flame lift-off location and the soot lift-off location and the relative natural luminosity signals were better predicted by the detailed soot model combined with the LES turbulence model. Qualitative comparisons of simulated local soot concentration distributions against experimental measurements in the literature confirmed the model’s performance. CFD simulations showed that the transition of domination from soot formation to soot oxidation was fuel-dependent, and the two fuels exhibited different temporal and spatial characteristics of soot emissions. CFD simulations also confirmed the lower sooting propensity of gasoline compared to ULSD under all investigated conditions.


Fuel ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Chartier ◽  
Ulf Aronsson ◽  
Öivind Andersson ◽  
Rolf Egnell ◽  
Bengt Johansson

2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobei Cheng ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Guang Hong ◽  
Fangqin Yan ◽  
Shijun Dong

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claes-Göran Zander ◽  
Ola Stenlåås ◽  
Per Tunestål ◽  
Bengt Johansson

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2188-2198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Lequien ◽  
Zheming Li ◽  
Oivind Andersson ◽  
Mattias Richter

Fuel ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1855-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.C. Rakopoulos ◽  
C.D. Rakopoulos ◽  
R.G. Papagiannakis ◽  
D.C. Kyritsis

Author(s):  
Kamran Poorghasemi ◽  
Fathollah Ommi ◽  
Vahid Esfahanian

In DI Diesel engines NO and Soot trade off is an important challenge for Engineers. In this paper, at first, multiple injection strategy will be introduced as a useful way to reduce both NO and Soot emissions simultaneously. Then the effect of injection pressure in post injection on the engine emissions will be studied. Investigations have been conducted on DI diesel engine. To evaluate the benefits of multiple injection strategies and to reveal combustion mechanism, modified three dimensional CFD code KIVA-3V was used. Results showed that using post injection with appropriate dwell between injection pulses can be effective in simultaneously reduction of emissions. Based on computation results, NO reduction formation mechanism is a single injection with retarded injection timing. It is shown that reduced soot formation is because of the fact that the soot producing rich regions at the fuel spray head are not replenished by new fuel when the injection is stopped and then restarted. Also increasing injection pressure in post injection will reduce the Soot emission dramatically while NO is in control and it is due to increasing fuel burning rate in post injection pulse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document