scholarly journals Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Injuries in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Double Antiplatelet Therapy in One-Year Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (10) ◽  
pp. 467-480
Author(s):  
Ling Zhong ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Xihua Qiu ◽  
Xueli Zhang ◽  
Hua Shao ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 836-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Cimminiello ◽  
Letizia Dondi ◽  
Antonella Pedrini ◽  
Giulia Ronconi ◽  
Silvia Calabria ◽  
...  

Aims Current guidelines strongly recommend antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (dual therapy) for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). To better understand how antiplatelet treatment is prescribed in clinical practice, the aim of this study was to provide a more detailed description of real-world patients with and without antiplatelet treatment after an ACS, their outcomes at one-year follow-up and the related integrated cost. Methods The ReS database, including more than 12 million inhabitants, was evaluated. During the accrual period ACS patients discharged alive were identified on the basis of ICD-IX-CM code. Antiplatelet drug prescriptions and healthcare costs were analysed over one-year follow-up. Results In 2014, of the 25,129 patients discharged alive after an ACS, 5796 (23%) did not receive any antiplatelet therapy during the first month after hospital discharge. Among them, 3846 (66%) subjects were prescribed an antiplatelet drug subsequently, while 7.7% did not receive any antiplatelet treatment during the whole following year. Dual therapy in the subgroup of patients undergoing a revascularization procedure ( n = 8436) was prescribed to 79.2% of cases and to 46.1% ( n = 4009) of medically managed patients. The patients not treated with an antiplatelet treatment in the first month showed the highest one-year healthcare costs, mostly due to hospital re-admissions. Conclusions This analysis of a large patient community shows that a considerable proportion of patients remained untreated with antiplatelet treatment after an ACS event. A clearer characterization of these subjects can help to improve the adherence to the current guidelines and recommendations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Ugurov ◽  
A Kapedanovska-Nestorovska ◽  
R A Rosalia ◽  
A Dimovski ◽  
Z K Mitrev

Abstract Background The treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) comprising of aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor; clopidogrel is usually the P2Y12 inhibitor of choice in patients with ACS. However, its efficacy has been questioned because of the relatively high incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) among ACS patients despite adherence to clopidogrel-DAPT. Several risk factors for MACCE following intervention in ACS patients have been described, among others, mutations in the CYP2C19 gene, a member of the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) network. The CYP2C19 enzyme is involved in the metabolism of clopidogrel Interindividual response variability to clopidogrel-DAPT and the increased risk for MACCE have been strongly linked to the CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 loss-of-function (LOF) allelic variants. Nonetheless, the known CYP2C19 polymorphisms fail to account for all adverse events related to clopidogrel insensitivity. Recent studies point to a putative role of the AKR1D1 gene as a trans-genetic regulator of the CYP450 network. The AKR1D1*36 (rs1872930) minor allelic variant was shown to augment hepatic CYP450 mRNA expression, consequently, increasing the CYP2C19 enzyme activity. To this end, we hypothesise that the AKR1D1*36 polymorphism contributes to the observed incidence of MACCE during clopidogrel antiplatelet therapy. Purpose To determine the association between the AKR1D1*36 (rs1872930) allele and MACCE in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients on clopidogrel-DAPT Methods We evaluated 198 consecutive ACS patients indicated for coronary angiography from October to November 2010. We performed a 5-year retrospective medical record review and screened for AKR1D1 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms; 118 patients had a complete medical history and were included in the study. The study participants were prospectively followed for five years or until the first incidence of MACCE. The Median follow up time was 38.5 months (IQR 24–48 months) Results The median age of the cohort was 62.5 years (IQR 57–66), and 55% were females. Follow-up was complete, there were no mortality cases. ACS patients carrying the AKR1D1*36 had a significantly shorter event-free-survival compared to wildtype patients, Hazard Ratio = 2.193 [CI95% 1.091 to 4.406], p=0.0155 (Figure 1). Median time-to-event was 36 months. Evaluation of additional candidate risk predictors in a Cox Proportional Hazards Model confirmed the AKR1D1*36 allele as an independent risk factor (HR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.18) and identified 3 additional risk factors for MACCE; previous percutaneous interventions (PCI), HR = 2.78; (95% CI, 1.34 to 5.78), a history of Myocardial Infarction, HR = 2.62; (95% CI, 1.48 to 4.64), at baseline and presence of the CYPC19*2 allele (HR = 2.33; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.06). Figure 1. Time-to-Event curve of MACCE Conclusions The AKR1D1*36 (rs1872930) minor variant allele is independently associated with a higher risk for MACCE. Acknowledgement/Funding None


Author(s):  
Shaoyi Guan ◽  
Xiaoming Xu ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Mingzi Guan ◽  
...  

Background Long‐term use of antiplatelet agents after acute coronary syndrome in diabetic patients is not well known. Here, we describe antiplatelet use and outcomes in such patients enrolled in the EPICOR Asia (Long‐Term Follow‐up of Antithrombotic Management Patterns in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Asia) registry. Methods and Results EPICOR Asia is a prospective, observational study of 12 922 patients with acute coronary syndrome surviving to discharge, from 8 countries/regions in Asia. The present analysis included 3162 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and 9602 patients without DM. The impact of DM on use of antiplatelet agents and events (composite of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, with or without any revascularization; individual components, and bleeding) was evaluated. Significant baseline differences were seen between patients with DM and patients without DM for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular history, angiographic findings, and use of percutaneous coronary intervention. At discharge, ≈90% of patients in each group received dual antiplatelet therapy. At 2‐year follow‐up, more patients with DM tended to still receive dual antiplatelet therapy (60% versus 56%). DM was associated with increased risk from ischemic but not major bleeding events. Independent predictors of the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with DM were age ≥65 years and use of diuretics at discharge. Conclusions Antiplatelet agent use is broadly comparable in patients with DM and patients without DM, although patients with DM are more likely to be on dual antiplatelet therapy at 2 years. Patients with DM are at increased risk of ischemic events, suggesting an unmet need for improved antithrombotic treatment. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01361386.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Nunez Martinez ◽  
N V-Ibarra ◽  
F Marin Ortuno ◽  
V Pernias Escrig ◽  
M Sandin Rollan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher atherothrombotic risk and higher rates of recurrent ischemic events compared with the non-diabetic population. Although current antiplatelet therapy strategies have been shown to be successful in improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients with DM continue to experience high rates of adverse cardiovascular events. Today, it is known that diabetic patients are characterized by a deregulation in different intracellular signaling pathways, which leads to an inadequate or suboptimal response to antiplatelets agents. The purpose of this study is to analyze the different therapeutic strategies, the use of new antiplatelet drugs and medium-term prognosis in diabetic patients compared with non-diabetic patients who have suffered an ACS. Methods It is an observational, prospective and multicenter registry of patients with ACS. The objective is to analyze the differences in the management of DM patients vs non-DM patients in the acute phase and their evolution during the first year after coronary event. Antiplatelet therapy administered will be evaluated, type of coronary injury and treatment performed, major adverse events as well as cardiovascular complications and mortality at one year of follow-up. Results Of a total of 1717 patients, 38% were diabetic. The diabetic population was older, with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and higher rate of previous cardiovascular events (cerebrovascular, peripheral arterial disease and coronary disease). Patients with DM received less new antiplatelets drugs at admission (15.5% DM vs 26.5% non DM, p<0.001) and less in-hospital switch to new antiplatelet agents was performed. They were subjected to a lower number of catheterizations and at the time of revascularization, the drug-eluting stent was of choice. During admission, they developed more complications, both ischemic (refractory angina, reinfarction or CVA) and hemorrhagic. Following one year, DM had higher major cardiovascular events (MACE) and higher mortality (7.72% vs 5.14%, p=0.0039). Non-coronary revascularization, renal failure, and reduced ejection fraction were predictive variables of death in diabetic population. Treatment with new antiplatelet drugs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total mortality an MACE without differences in major bleeding. Conclusion More than a third of patients with ACS are diabetic. These patients present with more severe coronary disease associating a greater number of cardiovascular events and a higher mortality rate after one year of ACS. However, despite this, they undergo less invasive tests and they were undertreated with the new antiplatelets therapies. Acknowledgement/Funding SEC


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Priyadarshani Galappatthy ◽  
Vipula Bataduwaarachchi ◽  
Priyanga Ranasinghe ◽  
Gamini Galappatthy ◽  
Upul Senerath ◽  
...  

Objective. To assess sex-based differences in the prevalence of risk factor, their management, and differences in the prognosis among acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in Sri Lanka. Methods. Patients diagnosed with ACS were recruited from hospitals throughout the island. The Joint European Societies guidelines were used to assess recommended targets for coronary heart disease risk factors, and the GRACE score was used to assess the post-ACS prognosis. Age-adjusted regression was performed to calculate odds ratios for men versus women in risk factor control. Results. A total of 2116 patients, of whom 1242 (58.7%) were men, were included. Significant proportion of women were nonsmokers; OR = 0.11 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.13). The prevalence of hypertension (p<0.001), diabetes (p<0.001), and dyslipidemia (p=0.004) was higher in women. The LDL-C target was achieved in a significantly higher percentage of women (12.6%); OR = 0.33 (95% CI 0.10 to 1.05). When stratified by age, no significant differences were observed in achieving the risk factor targets or management strategies used except for fasting blood sugar (p<0.05) where more men achieved control target in both age categories. Majority of the ACS patients had either high or intermediate risk for one-year mortality as per the GRACE score. In-hospital and 1-year mean mortality risk was significantly higher among men of less than 65 years of age (p<0.05). Conclusions. Smoking is significantly lower among Sri Lankan women diagnosed with ACS. However, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia were more prevalent among them. There was no difference in primary and secondary preventive strategies and management in both sexes but could be further improved in both groups.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
I. S Skopets ◽  
N. N Vezikova ◽  
I. M Marusenko ◽  
O. Yu Barysheva

A number of studies demonstrate that patients with traditional risk factors (TRF) have not only increases primary risk of atherothrombotic events, but are also associated with many complicates and poor prognosis.Purpose: assessment of TRF effect on the incidence of complications and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Materials and methods: in 255 patients hospitalized with ACS were retrospective determined the TRF prevalence, frequency of the complications and correlation between the presence of TRF and the risk of complications and long-term prognosis (follow-up 1 year).Results: patients had TRF very often, 80% patients had more than 3 TRFs. The presence of some TRFs (smoking, abdominal obesity, family history) was associated with a significantly increased risk of complications in patients with ACS, including life-threatening. Effect of TRF on long-term prognosis was not determined.Conclusion: the findings suggest the need to evaluation TRF not only in primary preventive and also to improve the effectiveness of risk stratification in patients with ACS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Zeymer ◽  
Lieven Annemans ◽  
Nicolas Danchin ◽  
Stuart Pocock ◽  
Simon Newsome ◽  
...  

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity in acute coronary syndrome patients, but impact on outcomes beyond 1 year is unclear. Methods: This was a post-hoc analysis from the long-tErm follow-uP of antithrombotic management patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients (EPICOR) registry (NCT01171404), a prospective, observational study conducted in Europe and Latin America, which enrolled acute coronary syndrome survivors at discharge. Antithrombotic management patterns, mortality, a composite endpoint of death/new non-fatal myocardial infarction/stroke and bleeding events were assessed after 2 years of follow-up in patients with or without AF. Results: Of 10,568 patients enrolled, 397 (4.7%) had prior AF and 382 (3.6%) new-onset AF during index hospitalisation. Fewer patients with AF underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (52.1% vs. 66.6%; P<0.0001). At discharge, fewer AF patients received dual antiplatelet therapy (71.6% vs. 89.5%; P<0.0001); oral anticoagulant use was higher in AF patients but was still infrequent (35.0% vs. 2.5%; P<0.0001). Use of dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulants declined over follow-up with over 50% of all AF/no AF patients remaining on dual antiplatelet therapy (55.6% vs. 60.6%), and 23.3% (new-onset AF) to 42.1% (prior AF) on oral anticoagulants at 2 years. At 2 years, mortality, composite endpoint and bleeding rates were higher in AF patients (all P<0.0001) compared to patients without AF. On multivariable analysis, the risk of mortality or the composite endpoint was significant for prior AF ( P=0.003, P=0.001) but not new-onset AF ( P=0.88, P=0.92). Conclusions: Acute coronary syndrome patients with AF represent a high-risk group with increased event rates during long-term follow-up. Prior AF is an independent predictor of mortality and/or ischaemic events at 2 years. Use of anticoagulants in AF after acute coronary syndrome is still suboptimal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document