scholarly journals Sensitivity and Specificity Determinations with Isoelectric Focusing Fractions of <i>Blastomyces dermatitidis</i> for Antibody Detection in Serum Specimens from Infected Dogs

2012 ◽  
Vol 02 (04) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua C. Wright ◽  
Terrick E. Harrild ◽  
Gene M. Scalarone
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Isoelectric Focusing ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Blastomyces Dermatitidis

scholarly journals ENZYME AND ANTIBODY DETECTION FOLLOWING ISOELECTRIC FOCUSING ON ULTRATHIN-LAYER REHYDRATED POLYACRYLAMIDE GELS

1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT C. ALLEN ◽  
BRUCE BUDOWLE ◽  
CALVIN A. SARAVIS ◽  
PETER M. LACK
Keyword(s):  
Isoelectric Focusing ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Polyacrylamide Gels ◽  
Ultrathin Layer

scholarly journals Evaluation of Six Commercial Point-of-Care Tests for Diagnosis of Acute Dengue Infections: the Need for Combining NS1 Antigen and IgM/IgG Antibody Detection To Achieve Acceptable Levels of Accuracy

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2095-2101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart D. Blacksell ◽  
Richard G. Jarman ◽  
Mark S. Bailey ◽  
Ampai Tanganuchitcharnchai ◽  
Kemajittra Jenjaroen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dengue Fever ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Dengue Infection ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Sample Collection ◽  
Igg Antibody ◽  
Igm Antibody ◽  
Ns1 Antigen ◽  
Antibody Tests

ABSTRACTSix assays were evaluated in this study to determine their suitability for the diagnosis of acute dengue infection using samples from 259 Sri Lankan patients with acute fevers (99 confirmed dengue cases and 160 patients with other confirmed acute febrile illnesses): (i) the Merlin dengue fever IgG & IgM combo device (Merlin), (ii) the Standard Diagnostics Dengue Duo nonstructural 1 (NS1) antigen and IgG/IgM combo device (Standard Diagnostics, South Korea), (iii) the Biosynex Immunoquick dengue fever IgG and IgM (Biosynex, France) assay, (iv) the Bio-Rad NS1 antigen strip (Bio-Rad, France), (v) the Panbio Dengue Duo IgG/IgM Cassette (Inverness, Australia), and (vi) the Panbio dengue NS1 antigen strip (Inverness, Australia). The median number of days of fever prior to admission sample collection was 5 days (interquartile range, 3 to 7 days). Sensitivity and specificity of the NS1 antigen tests ranged from 49 to 59% and from 93 to 99%, respectively, and sensitivity and sensitivity of the IgM antibody test ranged from 71 to 80% and from 46 to 90%, respectively. Combining the NS1 antigen and IgM antibody results from the Standard Diagnostics Dengue Duo test gave the best compromise of sensitivity and specificity (93% and 89%, respectively) and provided the best sensitivity in patients presenting at different times after fever onset. The Merlin IgM/IgG antibody tests correctly classified 64% and 86% of the primary and secondary dengue infection cases, respectively, and the Standard Diagnostics IgM/IgG antibody tests correctly classified 71% and 83% of the primary and secondary dengue infection cases, respectively. This study provides strong evidence of the value of combining dengue antigen- and antibody-based test results in the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) format for the acute diagnosis of dengue.

scholarly journals Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Serology tests: Are they good enough?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Piec ◽  
Emma English ◽  
M Annette Thomas ◽  
Samir Dervisevic ◽  
William D Fraser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Respiratory Infections ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Diagnostic Sensitivity ◽  
Medical Community ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Serological Tests ◽  
Negative Results

AbstractBackgroundIn the emergency of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, great efforts were made to quickly provide serology testing to the medical community however, these methods have been introduced into clinical practice without the complete validation usually required by the regulatory organizations.MethodsSARS-CoV-2 patient samples (n=43) were analysed alongside pre-pandemic control specimen (n=50), confirmed respiratory infections (n=50), inflammatory polyarthritis (n=22) and positive for thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (n=30). Imprecision, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and concordance were evaluated on IgG serologic assays from EuroImmun, Epitope Diagnostics (EDI), Abbott Diagnostics and DiaSorin and a rapid IgG/IgM test from Healgen.ResultsEDI and EuroImmun imprecision was 0.02-14.0% CV. Abbott and DiaSorin imprecision (CV) ranged from 5.2% - 8.1% and 8.2% - 9.6% respectively. Diagnostic sensitivity of the assays were 100% (CI: 80-100%) for Abbott, EDI and EuroImmun and 95% (CI: 73-100%) for DiaSorin at ≥14 days post PCR. Only the Abbott assay had a diagnostic specificity of 100% (CI: 91-100%). EuroImmun cross-reacted in 3 non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections and 2 controls. The DiaSorin displayed more false negative results and cross-reacted in six cases across all conditions tested. EDI had one cross-reactive sample. The Healgen rapid test showed excellent sensitivity and specificity. Overall, concordance of the assays ranged from 76.1% to 97.9%.ConclusionsSerological tests for SARS-CoV-2 showed good analytical performance. The head-to-head analysis of samples revealed differences in results that may be linked to the use of nucleocapsid or spike proteins. The point of care device tested demonstrated adequate performance for antibody detection.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Autoantibodies for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqian Guo ◽  
Lisha Tang ◽  
Qianyi Huang ◽  
Xiangqi Tang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Specific Subset

Objectives: To review the available evidence on sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody detection in diagnosing a specific subset of patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and to calculate the frequencies of different autoantibodies to paranodal proteins.Background: Diagnosis of CIDP relies on clinical and neurophysiologic criteria and lacks useful diagnostic biomarkers. A subset of CIDP patients exhibit atypical clinical phenotypes and impaired response to conventional treatments. These patients were reported as having autoantibodies targeting paranodal protein neurofascin isoform 155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1), and contactin-associated protein-1 (CASPR1). Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of these autoantibodies, especially for anti-NF155 antibody.Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science. Eligible studies provided information to calculate the frequencies of anti-NF155 antibody and anti-CNTN1 antibody, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody, and the incidence of improvement and deterioration among anti-NF155 antibody seropositive CIDP patients. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I2 statistics.Results: The pooled frequency of anti-NF155 autoantibody across 14 studies was 7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.05–0.10] with high heterogeneity; the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of anti-NF155 antibody for the diagnosis of a specific subgroup of CIDP patients were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.29–0.63) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97), respectively.Conclusions: For diagnosing of a specific subset of CIDP characterized by poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), we found a moderate sensitivity and a high specificity. The anti-NF155 antibody test should be used as a confirmatory test rather than a screening test.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42020203385 and CRD42020190789.

scholarly journals Sensitive detection of multiple islet autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes using small sample volumes by agglutination-PCR

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242049
Author(s):  
Felipe de Jesus Cortez ◽  
David Gebhart ◽  
Peter V. Robinson ◽  
David Seftel ◽  
Narges Pourmandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 1 Diabetes ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Insulin Autoantibodies ◽  
Islet Autoantibodies ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Analysis Platform

Islet autoantibodies are predominantly measured by radioassay to facilitate risk assessment and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. However, the reliance on radioactive components, large sample volumes and limited throughput renders radioassay testing costly and challenging. We developed a multiplex analysis platform based on antibody detection by agglutination-PCR (ADAP) for the sample-sparing measurement of GAD, IA-2 and insulin autoantibodies/antibodies in 1 μL serum. The assay was developed and validated in 7 distinct cohorts (n = 858) with the majority of the cohorts blinded prior to analysis. Measurements from the ADAP assay were compared to radioassay to determine correlation, concordance, agreement, clinical sensitivity and specificity. The average overall agreement between ADAP and radioassay was above 91%. The average clinical sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 97%. In the IASP 2018 workshop, ADAP achieved the highest sensitivity of all assays tested at 95% specificity (AS95) rating for GAD and IA-2 autoantibodies and top-tier performance for insulin autoantibodies. Furthermore, ADAP correctly identified 95% high-risk individuals with two or more autoantibodies by radioassay amongst 39 relatives of T1D patients tested. In conclusion, the new ADAP assay can reliably detect the three cardinal islet autoantibodies/antibodies in 1μL serum with high sensitivity. This novel assay may improve pediatric testing compliance and facilitate easier community-wide screening for islet autoantibodies.

scholarly journals 263. Advances in Diagnosis of Progressive Coccidioidomycos: Experience in 164 Cases and 508 Controls

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S146-S146
Author(s):  
Robert Myers ◽  
Holbrook Eric ◽  
Lawrence J Wheat ◽  
Christelle Kassis ◽  
Michelle Durkin
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Main Method ◽  
Antigen Testing ◽  
Urine And Serum

Abstract Background Antibody detection is the main method for diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis but has limitations including sensitivity and turnaround time. The MVISTA Coccidioides antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is recommended for testing CSF in suspected Coccidioides meningitis. The early reports on urine and serum antigen testing evaluated small numbers of patients who were mostly immunocompromised with advanced disease. Methods A retrospective study, including all patients in whom Coccidioides antigen testing was performed between January 2013 and May 2017, was conducted at Maricopa Integrated Health System (MIHS). Sensitivity and specificity of antigen testing at MiraVista Diagnostics and antibody testing at MIHS or commercial laboratories were evaluated in 164 cases and 508 controls. Results The sensitivity of antigen testing was 51% and specificity was 99%. The sensitivity of antigen detection was highest if both urine and serum were tested (57%) than if only urine was tested (38%). The sensitivity of antibody testing was 84% and the specificity was 94% by immunodiffusion (ID). The sensitivity and specificity of antigen or ID antibody testing both were 94%. Sensitivity of antigen testing was 57% in proven and 58% in probable cases, ID antibody in 85% of proven and 75% of probable and antigen or ID antibody in 93% of proven and 95% of probable cases. Antigen was detected more often in disseminated (79%) than pulmonary cases (42%) as was ID antibody, 91% and 79%, respectively. Antigen testing was more sensitive in immunocompromised (76%) than non-immunocompromised patients (41%) while ID antibody was less sensitive in immunocompromised (74%) than in non-immunocompromised patients (93%). Combined antigen and ID antibody testing provided the highest sensitivity, 94% in all cases, 94% in immunocompromised and 95% in non-immunocompromised patients. Conclusion These findings support testing urine and serum for Coccidioides antigen and serum for ID antibodies for diagnosis of progressive pulmonary or disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Designing of a multiepitopic antigen for anti-HBV antibody detection with high sensitivity and specificity: an in silico approach

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. S313
Author(s):  
Saeed Khalili ◽  
Rasaee Mohamad Javad ◽  
Mousavi Seyed Latif ◽  
Jafar Amani ◽  
Abolfazl Jahangiri
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
In Silico ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Antibody Detection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document