scholarly journals Effects of Intercropping on Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities in Amorphophallus konjac

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (09) ◽  
pp. 225-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinping Wu ◽  
Zhenbiao Jiao ◽  
Jie Zhou ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Shengwu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Amorphophallus Konjac ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Soil Bacterial

scholarly journals Effects of shade stress on turfgrasses morphophysiology and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Fu ◽  
Yilan Luo ◽  
Pengyue Sun ◽  
Jinzhu Gao ◽  
Donghao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Soil Bacterial

scholarly journals Effects of shade stress on turfgrasses morphophysiology and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Fu ◽  
Yilan Luo ◽  
Pengyue Sun ◽  
Jinzhu Gao ◽  
Donghao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Shade Tolerance ◽  
Soil Microorganisms ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Photosynthetic Capacity ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Plant Soil ◽  
Soil Bacterial

Abstract Background: The shade represents one of the major environmental limitations for turfgrass growth. Shade influences plant growth and alters plant metabolism, yet little is known about how shade affects the structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities and the role of soil microorganisms in plant shade responses. In this study, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to examine the impact of shade on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of two contrasting shade-tolerant turfgrasses, shade-tolerant dwarf lilyturf (Ophiopogon japonicus, OJ) and shade-intolerant perennial turf-type ryegrass (Lolium perenne, LP). We also examined soil-plant feedback effects on shade tolerance in the two turfgrass genotypes. The composition of the soil bacterial community was assayed using high-throughput sequencing. Results: OJ maintained higher photosynthetic capacity and root growth than LP under shade stress, thus OJ was found to be more shade-tolerant than LP. Shade-intolerant LP responded better to both shade and soil microbes than shade-tolerant OJ. The shade and live soil decreased LP growth, but increased biomass allocation to shoots in the live soil. The plant shade response index of LP is higher in live soil than sterile soil, driven by weakened soil-plant feedback under shade stress. In contrast, there was no difference in these values for OJ under similar shade and soil treatments. Shade stress had little impact on the diversity of the OJ and the LP bacterial communities, but instead impacted their composition. The OJ soil bacterial communities were mostly composed of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Further pairwise fitting analysis showed that a positive correlation of shade-tolerance in two turfgrasses and their bacterial community compositions. Several soil properties (NO3--N, NH4+-N, AK) showed a tight coupling with several major bacterial communities under shade stress. Moreover, OJ shared core bacterial taxa known to promote plant growth and confer tolerance to shade stress, which suggests common principles underpinning OJ-microbe interactions. Conclusion: Soil microorganisms mediate plant responses to shade stress via plant-soil feedback and shade-induced change in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure for OJ and LP plants. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding plant-soil interactions and their role in the mechanisms underlying shade tolerance in shade-tolerant turfgrasses.

scholarly journals Analysis of Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities on Seonginbong, Ulleungdo Island

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-328
Author(s):  
Yoon-Jong Nam ◽  
Hyeokjun Yoon ◽  
Hyun Kim ◽  
Jong-Guk Kim
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Soil Bacterial

scholarly journals Effects of shade stress on morphophysiology and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities of two contrasting shade-tolerant turfgrasses

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Fu ◽  
Yilan Luo ◽  
Pengyue Sun ◽  
Jinzhu Gao ◽  
Donghao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Shade Tolerance ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Bacterial Community Composition ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Soil Bacterial ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Perturbations in the abiotic stress directly or indirectly affect plants and root-associated microbial communities. Shade stress presents one of the major abiotic limitations for turfgrass growth, as light availability is severely reduced under a leaf canopy. Studies have shown that shade stress influences plant growth and alters plant metabolism, yet little is known about how it affects the structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities. In this study, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to examine the impact of shade stress on the physiology of two contrasting shade-tolerant turfgrasses and their rhizosphere soil microbes. Shade-tolerant dwarf lilyturf (Ophiopogon japonicus, OJ) and shade-intolerant perennial turf-type ryegrasss (Lolium perenne, LP) were used. Bacterial community composition was assayed using high-throughput sequencing. Results: Our physiochemical data showed that under shade stress, OJ maintained higher photosynthetic capacity and root growth, thus OJ was found to be more shade-tolerant than LP. Illumina sequencing data revealed that shade stress had little impact on the diversity of the OJ and LP’s bacterial communities, but instead impacted the composition of bacterial communities. The bacterial communities were mostly composed of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria in OJ soil. Further pairwise fitting analysis showed that a positive correlation of shade-tolerance in two turfgrasses and their bacterial community compositions. Several soil properties (NO3--N, NH4+-N, AK) showed a tight coupling with several major bacterial communities under shade stress, indicating that they are important drivers determining bacterial community structures. Moreover, OJ shared core bacterial taxa known to promote plant growth and confer tolerance to shade stress, which suggests common principles underpinning OJ-microbe interactions. Conclusion: OJ was more shade-tolerant than LP. Shifts in rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure play a vital role in shade-tolerance of OJ plants.

scholarly journals Effects of shade stress on turfgrasses morphophysiology and rhizosphere soil bacterial communities

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanjuan Fu ◽  
Yilan Luo ◽  
Pengyue Sun ◽  
Jinzhu Gao ◽  
Donghao Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Plant Growth ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Shade Tolerance ◽  
Soil Microorganisms ◽  
Rhizosphere Soil ◽  
Photosynthetic Capacity ◽  
Soil Bacterial Communities ◽  
Plant Soil ◽  
Soil Bacterial

Abstract Background: The shade represents one of the major environmental limitations for turfgrass growth. Shade influences plant growth and alters plant metabolism, yet little is known about how shade affects the structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities and the role of soil microorganisms in plant shade responses. In this study, a glasshouse experiment was conducted to examine the impact of shade on the growth and photosynthetic capacity of two contrasting shade-tolerant turfgrasses, shade-tolerant dwarf lilyturf (Ophiopogon japonicus, OJ) and shade-intolerant perennial turf-type ryegrass (Lolium perenne, LP). We also examined soil-plant feedback effects on shade tolerance in the two turfgrass genotypes. The composition of the soil bacterial community was assayed using high-throughput sequencing. Results: OJ maintained higher photosynthetic capacity and root growth than LP under shade stress, thus OJ was found to be more shade-tolerant than LP. Shade-intolerant LP responded better to both shade and soil microbes than shade-tolerant OJ. The shade and live soil decreased LP growth, but increased biomass allocation to shoots in the live soil. The plant shade response index of LP is higher in live soil than sterile soil, driven by weakened soil-plant feedback under shade stress. In contrast, there was no difference in these values for OJ under similar shade and soil treatments. Shade stress had little impact on the diversity of the OJ and the LP bacterial communities, but instead impacted their composition. The OJ soil bacterial communities were mostly composed of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Further pairwise fitting analysis showed that a positive correlation of shade-tolerance in two turfgrasses and their bacterial community compositions. Several soil properties (NO3--N, NH4+-N, AK) showed a tight coupling with several major bacterial communities under shade stress. Moreover, OJ shared core bacterial taxa known to promote plant growth and confer tolerance to shade stress, which suggests common principles underpinning OJ-microbe interactions. Conclusion: Soil microorganisms mediate plant responses to shade stress via plant-soil feedback and shade-induced change in the rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure for OJ and LP plants. These findings emphasize the importance of understanding plant-soil interactions and their role in the mechanisms underlying shade tolerance in shade-tolerant turfgrasses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document