scholarly journals Modern Sovereign Money—Part I: The Moral Hazard of Fractional Reserve Banking

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (09) ◽  
pp. 101-115
Author(s):  
Christian Etzrodt
Keyword(s):  
Moral Hazard ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Reserve Banking

scholarly journals A Digital Currency Architecture for Privacy and Owner-Custodianship

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Goodell ◽  
Hazem Danny Al-Nakib ◽  
Paolo Tasca
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Risk ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Point Of Sale ◽  
Digital Currency ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Banking Relationships ◽  
Reserve Banking ◽  
Payment Mechanisms

In recent years, electronic retail payment mechanisms, especially e-commerce and card payments at the point of sale, have increasingly replaced cash in many developed countries. As a result, societies are losing a critical public retail payment option, and retail consumers are losing important rights associated with using cash. To address this concern, we propose an approach to digital currency that would allow people without banking relationships to transact electronically and privately, including both e-commerce purchases and point-of-sale purchases that are required to be cashless. Our proposal introduces a government-backed, privately-operated digital currency infrastructure to ensure that every transaction is registered by a bank or money services business, and it relies upon non-custodial wallets backed by privacy-enhancing technology, such as blind signatures or zero-knowledge proofs, to ensure that transaction counterparties are not revealed. Our approach to digital currency can also facilitate more efficient and transparent clearing, settlement, and management of systemic risk. We argue that our system can restore and preserve the salient features of cash, including privacy, owner-custodianship, fungibility, and accessibility, while also preserving fractional reserve banking and the existing two-tiered banking system. We also show that it is possible to introduce regulation of digital currency transactions involving non-custodial wallets that unconditionally protect the privacy of end-users.

Rozeff on free banking: a critique

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-136
Author(s):  
Laura Davidson ◽  
Walter E. Block
Keyword(s):  
Design Methodology ◽  
Free Banking ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Monetary System ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Reserve Banking

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to correct Rozeff (2010). He contends that fractional-reserve banking is legitimate and efficacious. The authors demonstrate that it is not. Design/methodology/approach The design of this paper is to quote widely from Rozeff (2010) and then to expose his errors of analysis. Findings The authors demonstrate that fractional-reserve banking is neither legitimate nor efficacious. Originality/value Money is the lifeblood of the economy. If so, then banking is the marrow of the economy, since it is from that sector that money arises in the first place. It is crucially important, then, that the monetary system be based on sound principles. Fractional-reserve banking is a violation of these sound principles. Therefore, it is valuable to demonstrate that this is indeed the case.

Banks, private money creation, and regulatory reform

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-34
Author(s):  
Gerry Cross
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Reform ◽  
Recent Criticism ◽  
Multiple Use ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Private Money ◽  
Money Creation ◽  
Reserve Banking ◽  
New Framework

Purpose This paper aims to consider recent arguments that post-crisis regulatory reform has misunderstood the nature of banks’ activities. These arguments suggest that a bank’s role is not that of intermediation between savers and borrowers but the systemically riskier one of private money creation. Design/methodology/approach The paper assesses whether banks’ activities are best understood as private money creation rather than intermediation. It considers the argument that regulatory reform has not gone far enough to prevent a recurrence of future credit spirals ending in financial crises. Findings This paper analyses banks’ activities and finds that it is incorrect to consider that they engage in relatively unfettered money creation. While fractional reserve banking does create flows of money through the economy, these flows are tethered to banks’ funding requirements. Multiple use of that money, rather than representing an ill-understood risk, simply reflects the nature of maturity transformation. This has not been missed in designing the post-crisis regulatory framework. The revised framework contains many features that are not fully recognised by proponents of the money creation critique and goes significantly further than they allow. Once completed, it will address many of the concerns they raise. They are right to call for further consideration of whether the countercyclical features of the new framework are sufficiently developed. Originality/value The paper provides an early detailed response to recent criticism of the post-crisis regulatory reform programme coming from a money creation perspective of banks’ role in the economy.

The ontology of fractional reserve banking

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAËL BAUWENS
Keyword(s):  
Final Section ◽  
Social Ontology ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
Fractional Reserve Banking ◽  
Critical Position ◽  
Fractional Reserve ◽  
Realist Position ◽  
Reserve Banking ◽  
Ontological Framework ◽  
Social Metaphysics

AbstractThe recent economic crisis has re-ignited the debate over the institution of fractional reserve banking (FRB) and its possible adverse economic effects. This paper brings a so far neglected aspect of the problem to the table, namely social ontology. After addressing the scope of social ontology in relation to social metaphysics, social science and FRB, a general ontological framework for money and banking is sketched and applied to the debate between Austrian opponents and proponents of FRB. It shows that the oppositions reflect metaphysical and ontological positions on the reality of powers and dispositions, namely that a realist position in the metaphysics of powers and dispositions tends to a critical position toward FRB, whereas a sceptical position on powers and dispositions leads to a favorable position toward FRB. A final section gives further examples of how these ontological presuppositions shape other arguments in the debate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document