scholarly journals The Quaternion Structure of Space-Time and Arrow of Time

2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (07) ◽  
pp. 570-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Qiu Gu
2009 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 243-251
Author(s):  
VLADIMIR G. IVANCEVIC ◽  
TIJANA T. IVANCEVIC

The unique Hamiltonian description of neuro- and psycho-dynamics at the macroscopic, classical, inter-neuronal level of brain's neural networks, and microscopic, quantum, intra-neuronal level of brain's microtubules, is presented in the form of an open Liouville equation. This implies the arrow of time in both neuro- and psycho-dynamic processes and proves the existence of the formal neuro-biological space-time self-similarity. This proof implies the existence of a unique neurodynamical law, which acts on different scales of brain's functioning.


Author(s):  
Alexandre Harvey-Tremblay

Consistent with special relativity and statistical physics, here we construct a partition function of space-time events. The union of these two theories resolves longstanding problems in regards to time. It augments the standard description of time given by the (non-relativistic) arrow of time to one able to show the emergence of three macroscopic regimes of time: the past, the present, and the future, represented by space-like entropy, light-like entropy, and time-like entropy, respectively, and in a manner consistent with our experience of said regimes. First, using Fermi-Dirac statistics, we find that the system essentially describes a "waterfall" of space-time events. This "waterfall" recedes in space-time at the speed of light towards the direction of the future as it "floods" local space with events that it depletes from the past. In this union, an observer O will perceive two horizons that can be interpreted as hiding events behind it. The first is an event horizon, and its entropy hides events in the regions that O cannot see. The second is a time horizon, and its entropy "shields" events from O's causal influence. As only past events are "shielded", and not future events, an asymmetry in time is thus created. Finally, future events are hidden by an entropy prohibiting O from knowing the future before the present catches on.


2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 2335-2339 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEAN M. CARROLL ◽  
JENNIFER CHEN

If our universe underwent inflation, its entropy during the inflationary phase would have been substantially lower than it is today. Because a low-entropy state is less likely to be chosen randomly than a high-entropy one, inflation is unlikely to arise through randomly-chosen initial conditions. To resolve this puzzle, we examine the notion of a natural state for the universe, and argue that it is a nearly-empty space–time. If empty space has a small vacuum energy, however, inflation can begin spontaneously in this background. This scenario explains why a universe like ours is likely to have begun via a period of inflation, and also provides an origin for the cosmological arrow of time.


2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Haag

Abstract Apparent paradoxes in Quantum Physics demand a sharp distinction between a "real part of the world" and the realm of possibilities. In the former we may distinguish individual elements (coarse events) relating to space-time, with causal connections between them respecting the relativistic locality principle. The latter, quantitatively described by probability assignments conditioned on existing facts and depending on the definition of equivalence classes of situations, cannot be subdivided in space-time categories. There are global correlations (Pauli principle...). The cut between the realms of facts and possibilities implies an evolutionary picture of the "real world" in which the (generalized) arrow of time assumes basic significance. Some deficiencies of existing theory are pointed out.


Author(s):  
Alexandre Harvey-Tremblay

Consistent with special relativity and statistical physics, here we construct a partition function of space-time events. The union of these two theories resolves longstanding problems regarding time. We will argue that it augments the standard description of time given by the (non-relativistic) arrow of time to one able to describe the past, the present and the future in a manner consistent with our macroscopic experience of such. First, using Fermi-Dirac statistics, we find that the system essentially describes a "waterfall" of space-time events. This "waterfall" recedes in space-time at the speed of light towards the direction of the future as it "floods" local space with events that it depletes from the past. In this union, an observer $\mathcal{O}$ will perceive two horizons that can be interpreted as hiding events behind them. The first is an event horizon and its entropy hides events in the regions that $\mathcal{O}$ cannot see. The second is a time horizon, and its entropy "shields" events from $\mathcal{O}$'s causal influence. As only past events are "shielded" and not future events, an asymmetry in time is thus created. Finally, future events are hidden by an entropy prohibiting $\mathcal{O}$ from knowing the future before the present catches on.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Roger Penrose ◽  
Wolfgang Rindler
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document