scholarly journals Risk Factor Assessment of Coal Mine Drainage Water on Surrounding Agricultural Soil: A Case Study at Barapukuria in Bangladesh

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
Sharmin Sultana ◽  
Pradip Kumar Biswas ◽  
Aminur Rahman ◽  
Shanjida Sultana ◽  
Mohammad Nazim Zaman
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Coal Mine ◽  
Agricultural Soil ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Drainage Water ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage ◽  
Risk Factor Assessment

scholarly journals Characterization of Coal Spoil Recovered from Coal Mine Drainage Water

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (11) ◽  
pp. 227-236
Author(s):  
Aninda Nafis Ahmed ◽  
Md. Anwar Arfien Khan ◽  
Madhu Sudan Saha ◽  
Sharmin Sultana
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Drainage Water ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage

Remediation of coal-mine drainage by a sulfate-reducing bioreactor: A case study from the Illinois coal basin, USA

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. S162-S166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T. Behum ◽  
Liliana Lefticariu ◽  
Kelly S. Bender ◽  
Yosief T. Segid ◽  
Andrew S. Burns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Coal Basin ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage ◽  
Sulfate Reducing ◽  
Sulfate Reducing Bioreactor ◽  
Illinois Coal Basin

The Effect of Soil on the Renovation of Acid Coal Mine Drainage Water

1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 621-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Cronce ◽  
Louis T. Kardos ◽  
Edward J. Ciolkosz
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Drainage Water ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage

scholarly journals The economic pre-treatment of coal mine drainage water with caustic and ozone

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 1022-1034 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. H. Boyden ◽  
L. Nador ◽  
S. Addleman ◽  
L. Jeston
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Current System ◽  
Drainage Water ◽  
Water Recovery ◽  
Hydraulic Residence Time ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage ◽  
Oxidation Reduction ◽  
Cu Catalyst ◽  
Pre Treatment

Coal mine drainage waters are low in pH with varying amounts of iron and manganese and are generally brackish. The Austar Coal Mine in NSW, Australia, sought alternatives to their current lime dosing as the pre-treatment before the downstream reverse osmosis plant. Undesirable operating aspects of the current system include manganese and gypsum scaling/fouling, the need for anti-scalants and reduced water recovery. Thirteen processes for acid mine drainage were initially considered. The preferred process of caustic and ozone for Mn(II) oxidation was pilot tested at up to 0.74 kL/hr at the mine site. Under proper conditions and no aeration, about 81 per cent of the Fe could be removed (initially at 156 mg/L) as green rust. Supplemental aeration followed first-order kinetics and allowed 99.9 per cent Fe(II) oxidation and removal but only with a hydraulic residence time of about 47 minutes. The addition of supplemental Cu catalyst improved Fe removal. Ozone applied after caustic was effective in stoichiometrically oxidising recalcitrant Mn(II) and any remaining Fe(II). Control of the ozonation was achieved using the oxidation reduction potential during oxidation of the Mn(II) species. The use of caustic, followed by ozone, proved economically comparable to the current lime pre-treatment.

scholarly journals Acid neutralization within limestone sand reactors receiving coal mine drainage

2005 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby J. Watten ◽  
Philip L. Sibrell ◽  
Michael F. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Coal Mine ◽  
Mine Drainage ◽  
Acid Neutralization ◽  
Coal Mine Drainage ◽  
Limestone Sand
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document