The Influence of Rain Gauge Network Density on the Performance of a Hydrological Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-50
Author(s):  
George Andiego ◽  
Muhammad Waseem ◽  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Nithish Mani
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

scholarly journals The Influence of Rain Gauge Network Density on the Performance of a Hydrological Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 27-50
Author(s):  
George Andiego ◽  
Muhammad Waseem ◽  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Nithish Mani
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

scholarly journals Influence of the rain gauge network on the performance of a hydrological lumped model applied at different basin scales

RBRH ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefany Correia de Paula ◽  
Rutineia Tassi ◽  
Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli ◽  
Francisco Lorenzini Neto
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Lumped Model ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

ABSTRACT In this study was evaluated the influence of the rainfall monitoring network density and distribution on the result of rainfall-runoff daily simulations of a lumped model (IPH II) considering basins with different drainage scales: Turvo River (1,540 km2), Ijuí River (9,462 km2), Jacuí River (38,700 km2) and Upper Uruguay (61,900 km2). For this purpose, four rain gauge coverage scenarios were developed: (I) 100%; (II) 75%; (III) 50% and (IV) 25% of the rain gauges of the basin. Additionally, a scenario considering the absence of monitoring was evaluated, in which the rainfall used in the modeling was estimated based on the TRMM satellite. Was verified that, in some situations, the modeling produced better results for scenarios with a lower rain gauges density if the available gauges presented better spatial distribution. Comparatively to the simulations performed with the rainfall estimated by the TRMM, the results obtained using rain gauges’ data were better, even in scenarios with low rain gauges density. However, when the poor spatial distribution of the rain gauges was associated with low density, the satellite’s estimation provided better results. Thus, was conclude that spatial distribution of the rain gauge network is important in the rainfall representation and that estimates obtained by the TRMM can be presented as alternatives for basins with a deficient monitoring network.

scholarly journals Multifractal Comparison of Reflectivity and Polarimetric Rainfall Data from C- and X-Band Radars and Respective Hydrological Responses of a Complex Catchment Model

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Paz ◽  
Bernard Willinger ◽  
Auguste Gires ◽  
Laurent Monier ◽  
Christophe Zobrist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Distributed Hydrological Model ◽  
Space Resolution ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
X Band ◽  
Distributed Simulations ◽  
Rain Gauge Network ◽  
Catchment Model

This paper presents a comparison between rain gauges, C-band and X-band radar data over an instrumented and regulated catchment of the Paris region, as well as their respective hydrological impacts with the help of flow observations and a semi-distributed hydrological model. Both radars confirm the high spatial variability of the rainfall down to their space resolution (respectively one kilometer and 250 m) and therefore underscore limitations of semi-distributed simulations. The use of the polarimetric capacity of the Météo-France C-band radar was limited to corrections of the horizontal reflectivity and its rainfall estimates are adjusted with the help of a rain gauge network. On the contrary, neither calibration was performed for the polarimetric X-band radar of the Ecole des Ponts ParisTech (below called ENPC X-band radar), nor any optimization of its scans. In spite of that and the non-negligible fact that the catchment was much closer to the C-band radar than to the X-band radar (20 km vs. 40 km), the latter seems to perform at least as well as the former, but with a higher scale resolution. This characteristic was best highlighted with the help of a multifractal analysis of the respective radar data, which also shows that the X-band radar was able to pick up a few extremes that were smoothed out by the C-band radar.

scholarly journals Rainfall-Streamflow Relationship using Stepwise Method as a Basis for Rationalization of Rain Gauge Network Density

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 3814-3821
Keyword(s):  
Information Needs ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Rainfall Variation ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Stepwise Method ◽  
Streamflow Data ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

The design of rain gauge network density must be adjusted to meet the information needs of specific water uses, particularly in regard to availability of good quality and quantity of rainfall data. The study has an aim to conduct a rationalization to obtain an optimal number of rain gauge network density based on the WMO standard and the stepwise regression method. The rationalization of rain gauge network density using the stepwise method was carried out by examining the multiple correlation (r) and determination coefficient (R2 ) between rainfall and streamflow data and subsequently, to find out the rain gauges that contribute the most to the multiple regression model as a basis to determine the optimal number of rain gauge. The results found that the study area experienced a high density of rain gauge network refer to the WMO standard. The rationalization using the stepwise method showed that five rain gauges recommended as the optimal number of rain gauge. The percentage root mean square (rms) of basin rainfall showed values of 3.58% (less than 10%) which indicated that the recommended rain gauges have no significant problem regarding rainfall variation to determine basin rainfall. The study confirmed that the WMO standard and stepwise method approaches could be used as a sufficient tool to evaluate and rationalize a rain gauge network density in a river basin.

scholarly journals Identification of the Optimum Rain Gauge Network Density for Hydrological Modelling Based on Radar Rainfall Analysis

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1906
Author(s):  
Yeboah Gyasi-Agyei
Keyword(s):  
Scaling Laws ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrological Modelling ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Sampled Data ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Analysis ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Performance Statistics ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Rain gauges continue to be sources of rainfall data despite progress made in precipitation measurements using radar and satellite technology. There has been some work done on assessing the optimum rain gauge network density required for hydrological modelling, but without consensus. This paper contributes to the identification of the optimum rain gauge network density, using scaling laws and bias-corrected 1 km × 1 km grid radar rainfall records, covering an area of 28,371 km2 that hosts 315 rain gauges in south-east Queensland, Australia. Varying numbers of radar pixels (rain gauges) were repeatedly sampled using a unique stratified sampling technique. For each set of rainfall sampled data, a two-dimensional correlogram was developed from the normal scores obtained through quantile-quantile transformation for ordinary kriging which is a stochastic interpolation. Leave-one-out cross validation was carried out, and the simulated quantiles were evaluated using the performance statistics of root-mean-square-error and mean-absolute-bias, as well as their rates of change. A break in the scaling of the plots of these performance statistics against the number of rain gauges was used to infer the optimum rain gauge network density. The optimum rain gauge network density varied from 14 km2/gauge to 38 km2/gauge, with an average of 25 km2/gauge.

Evaluation of optimal rain gauge network density for rainfall-runoff modelling

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Montesarchio ◽  
Dario Orlando ◽  
Denise Del Bove ◽  
Francesco Napolitano ◽  
Stefano Magnaldi
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rain Gauge Network
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document