scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Method to Quantify Midazolam in a New Oral Formulation for Pediatric Use

2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (08) ◽  
pp. 552-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Flores Pérez ◽  
Juan Luis Chávez Pacheco ◽  
Janett Flores Pérez ◽  
Hugo Juárez Olguín ◽  
Blanca Ramírez Mendiola ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (12-13) ◽  
pp. 1719-1721
Author(s):  
Leandro Javier Salvo ◽  
Lorenzo Coiana ◽  
Cecilia Dobrecky ◽  
Valeria Tripodi ◽  
Sabrina Flor ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 433 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 119-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.L. de Goede ◽  
R.R. Boedhram ◽  
M. Eckhardt ◽  
L.M. Hanff ◽  
B.C.P. Koch ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 647-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Piazzon Tagliari ◽  
Hellen Karine Stulzer ◽  
Fabio Seigi Murakami ◽  
Gislaine Kuminek ◽  
Bruno Valente ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Martin G. Sanda ◽  
David P. Wood ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Steinbach ◽  
Heidrun Stoeger

Abstract. We describe the development and validation of an instrument for measuring the affective component of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards self-regulated learning. The questionnaire assesses the affective component towards those cognitive and metacognitive strategies that are especially effective in primary school. In a first study (n = 230), the factor structure was verified via an exploratory factor analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis with data from a second study (n = 400) indicated that the theoretical factor structure is appropriate. A comparison with four alternative models identified the theoretically derived factor structure as the most appropriate. Concurrent validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures the degree to which teachers create learning environments that enable students to self-regulate their learning. Retrospective validity was demonstrated by correlations with a scale that measures teachers’ experiences with self-regulated learning. In a third study (n = 47), the scale’s concurrent validity was tested with scales measuring teachers’ evaluation of the desirability of different aspects of self-regulated learning in class. Additionally, predictive validity was demonstrated via a binary logistic regression, with teachers attitudes as predictor on their registration for a workshop on self-regulated learning and their willingness to implement a seven-week training program on self-regulated learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 852-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Gunnesch-Luca ◽  
Klaus Moser

Abstract. The current paper presents the development and validation of a unit-level Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) scale based on the Referent-Shift Consensus Model (RSCM). In Study 1, with 124 individuals measured twice, both an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) established and confirmed a five-factor solution (helping behavior, sportsmanship, loyalty, civic virtue, and conscientiousness). Test–retest reliabilities at a 2-month interval were high (between .59 and .79 for the subscales, .83 for the total scale). In Study 2, unit-level OCB was analyzed in a sample of 129 work teams. Both Interrater Reliability (IRR) measures and Interrater Agreement (IRA) values provided support for RSCM requirements. Finally, unit-level OCB was associated with group task interdependence and was more predictable (by job satisfaction and integrity of the supervisor) than individual-level OCB in previous research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document