scholarly journals Rhinology on the move despite Covid-19!

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-417
Author(s):  
P.W. Hellings

The October 2020 issue of Rhinology is a very interesting edition as it illustrates how world-wide colleagues pave the way for a better future of patients affected by nose and sinus diseases. After the successful launch of EPOS2020 in Spring 2020, the editorial team of Rhinology is proud to present to you the latest and most exciting data in Rhinology research. Getting insight into the complexity and relevance of proteomics in CRS, epithelial-mesenchymal contribution to CRS, zinc levels in nasal and systemic compartment of CRS, nasal biomarkers of CRSwNP that predict recurrence of disease after sinus surgery, and the odor identification test for children, called "U-Sniff", and FID scores (Frequency, Intensity and Duration) scores for epistaxis are all in the 2020 October issue and highly relevant for Rhinology practice. These studies build further on the solid grounds of previous Rhinology research meeting the unmets needs in the field.

10.28945/3848 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 189-197
Author(s):  
Gilbert Gonzalez

Academic researchers and practitioners disagree on the value and methodology of creating a startup plan. An analysis of the differences and the motivations of these two district communities gives insight into the challenges of planning a successful launch.


Rheumatology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1027-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Mcnally ◽  
B. Rooney ◽  
O. Stewart

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Schreurs ◽  
Angus Duff ◽  
Pascale M. Le Blanc ◽  
Thomas H. Stone

Purpose This article aims to provide prospective authors guidelines that will hopefully enable them to submit more competitive manuscripts to journals publishing careers research.Design/methodology/approach Based on their experience as an author, reviewer and editorial team member, the authors identify the main criteria that a quantitative study must meet to be considered for publication in international peer-reviewed journals covering career-related topics. They emphasize the importance of contributing to the careers literature and of designing the study in accordance with the research question.Findings Manuscripts are rejected because they are insufficiently innovative, and/or because sample, instruments and design are not appropriate to answer the research question at hand. Cross-sectional designs cannot be used to answer questions of mediation but should not be discarded automatically since they can be used to address other types of questions, including questions about nesting, clustering of individuals into subgroups, and to some extent, even causality.Originality/value The manuscript provides an insight into the decision-making process of reviewers and editorial board members and includes recommendations on the use of cross-sectional data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (21) ◽  
pp. 2871-2878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Watanabe ◽  
Keisuke Suzuki ◽  
Tomoyuki Miyamoto ◽  
Masayuki Miyamoto ◽  
Ayaka Numao ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nordin ◽  
M. Nyroos ◽  
E. Maunuksela ◽  
T. Niskanen ◽  
H. Tuorila

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 741-741
Author(s):  
HAROLD K. MARDER ◽  
LAXMI S. SRIVASTAVA ◽  
STEPHEN BURSTEIN

In Reply.— We thank Nishi et al for outlining the role that has been suggested for zinc in normal testicular function and the speculation that zinc deficiency might contribute to the hypergonadotropic hypogonadism found in males with chronic renal failure. We have no data concerning zinc levels in our patients, and so we felt we could offer no further insight into the possibility that zinc deficiency might play a role in the etiology of the hypergonadotropism we described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document