scholarly journals What Should be Taken into Consideration for a Meta-Analysis of Green Tea Consumption and Stomach Cancer Risk?

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. e2010012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongseon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

scholarly journals Green Tea Consumption and Stomach Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. e2010001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunseok Kang ◽  
Sun Young Rha ◽  
Kyung Won Oh ◽  
Chung Mo Nam
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

Green tea consumption and risk of stomach cancer: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 670-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Kwon Myung ◽  
Woo Kyung Bae ◽  
Seung Min Oh ◽  
Yeol Kim ◽  
Woong Ju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stomach Cancer ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Tea Consumption

Green tea consumption and breast cancer risk or recurrence: a meta-analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeyemi A. Ogunleye ◽  
Fei Xue ◽  
Karin B. Michels
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

A dose-response meta-analysis of green tea consumption and breast cancer risk

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 656-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Wang ◽  
Yanyan Zhao ◽  
Feifei Chong ◽  
Mengmeng Song ◽  
Qiuyu Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

The association between green tea consumption and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1855-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Najaf Najafi ◽  
Maryam Salehi ◽  
Masumeh Ghazanfarpour ◽  
Zeinab Sadat Hoseini ◽  
Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Breast Cancer Risk ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

Green Tea and Black Tea Consumption and Prostate Cancer Risk: An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 663-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jusheng Zheng ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Tao Huang ◽  
Yinghua Yu ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prostate Cancer Risk ◽  
Black Tea ◽  
Tea Consumption

Green Tea Consumption and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 513-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Yi ◽  
Hailong Liang ◽  
Huang Jing ◽  
Zhang Jian ◽  
Yang Guang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Tea Consumption

scholarly journals Anti-Influenza with Green Tea Catechins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Molecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 4014
Author(s):  
Anchalee Rawangkan ◽  
Kirati Kengkla ◽  
Sukrit Kanchanasurakit ◽  
Acharaporn Duangjai ◽  
Surasak Saokaew
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Green Tea ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Influenza Infection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Influenza Virus Infection ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Tea Consumption ◽  
Tea Catechins ◽  
Green Tea Catechins

Influenza is one of the most serious respiratory viral infections worldwide. Although several studies have reported that green tea catechins (GTCs) might prevent influenza virus infection, this remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of eight studies with 5,048 participants that examined the effect of GTC administration on influenza prevention. In a random-effects meta-analysis of five RCTs, 884 participants treated with GTCs showed statistically significant effects on the prevention of influenza infection compared to the control group (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95%CIs 0.51–0.89, P = 0.005) without evidence of heterogeneity (I2= 0%, P = 0.629). Similarly, in three cohort studies with 2,223 participants treated with GTCs, there were also statistically significant effects (RR 0.52, 95%CIs 0.35–0.77, P = 0.001) with very low evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 3%, P = 0.358). Additionally, the overall effect in the subgroup analysis of gargling and orally ingested items (taking capsules and drinking) showed a pooled RR of 0.62 (95% CIs 0.49–0.77, P = 0.003) without heterogeneity (I2= 0%, P = 0.554). There were no obvious publication biases (Egger’s test (P = 0.138) and Begg’s test (P = 0.103)). Our analysis suggests that green tea consumption is effective in the prophylaxis of influenza infections. To confirm the findings before implementation, longitudinal clinical trials with specific doses of green tea consumption are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document