scholarly journals Interspecific variation in prey capture behavior by co-occurringNepenthespitcher plants

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e27930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijin Chin ◽  
Arthur YC Chung ◽  
Charles Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Interspecific Variation ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Hydrodynamic Contributions to Multimodal Guidance of Prey Capture Behavior in Fish

2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Montgomery ◽  
Fiona Macdonald ◽  
Cindy F. Baker ◽  
Alexander G. Carton
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Prey Capture Behavior in Nine Species of Venomous Snakes

1986 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chiszar ◽  
Charles W. Radcliffe ◽  
Thomas Byers ◽  
Rebecca Stoops
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Venomous Snakes ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Prey capture behavior and kinematics of the Atlantic cownose ray, Rhinoptera bonasus

Zoology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desirée E. Sasko ◽  
Mason N. Dean ◽  
Philip J. Motta ◽  
Robert E. Hueter
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Cownose Ray ◽  
Rhinoptera Bonasus ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Prey Capture Behavior in the Blue-Tongued Skink, Tiliqua scincoides

1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara L. Smith ◽  
Kenneth V. Kardong ◽  
Vincent L. Bels
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Modulation of prey-capture behavior in the plethodontid salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii

1997 ◽  
Vol 200 (14) ◽  
pp. 1951-1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Deban
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
Prey Capture ◽  
Prey Size ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Prey Type ◽  
Jaw Movements ◽  
Plethodontid Salamander ◽  
Ensatina Eschscholtzii ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

The hypothesis that salamander prey-capture behavior is highly stereotyped was tested in the plethodontid salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii using high-speed videography and kinematic analysis of feedings on two types of prey (waxworms and termites). The results show that E. eschscholtzii is capable of modulating the timing and magnitude of tongue and jaw movements in response to prey type. Feedings on waxworms, the larger prey, were characterized by shorter durations and higher velocities of tongue and jaw movements compared with feedings on termites, particularly in the latter portion of the feeding sequence (i.e. after prey contact). To test the hypothesis that sensory feedback through the tongue pad plays a role in modulating feeding movements in response to prey type, the ramus lingualis of the glossopharyngeal nerve (cranial nerve IX), which is known to carry sensory information from the tongue pad in salamanders, was transected bilaterally. This experimental deafferentation of the tongue pad had no effect on the degree or direction of differences in feeding kinematics across prey type. These results refute the glossopharyngeal feedback hypothesis, but are consistent with the hypothesis that E. eschscholtzii responds more vigorously to larger prey by assessing prey size visually.

Prey-capture behavior in gymnotid electric fish: motion analysis and effects of water conductivity

2001 ◽  
Vol 204 (3) ◽  
pp. 543-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. MacIver ◽  
N.M. Sharabash ◽  
M.E. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Prey Capture ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Orienting Response ◽  
Signal Acquisition ◽  
Three Dimensional Model ◽  
Water Conductivity ◽  
Detection Distance ◽  
Surrounding Water ◽  
Prey Capture Behavior

Animals can actively influence the content and quality of sensory information they acquire from the environment through the positioning of peripheral sensory surfaces. This study investigated receptor surface positioning during prey-capture behavior in weakly electric gymnotiform fish of the genus Apteronotus. Infrared video techniques and three-dimensional model-based tracking methods were used to provide quantitative information on body position and conformation as black ghost (A. albifrons) and brown ghost (A. leptorhynchus) knifefish hunted for prey (Daphnia magna) in the dark. We found that detection distance depends on the electrical conductivity of the surrounding water. Best performance was observed at low water conductivity (2.8 cm mean detection distance and 2 % miss rate at 35 microS cm(−)(1), A. albifrons) and poorest performance at high conductivity (1.5 cm mean detection distance and 11 % miss rate at 600 microS cm(−)(1), A. albifrons). The observed conductivity-dependence implies that nonvisual prey detection in Apteronotus is likely to be dominated by the electrosense over the range of water conductivities experienced by the animal in its natural environment. This result provides the first evidence for the involvement of electrosensory cues in the prey-capture behavior of gymnotids, but it leaves open the possibility that both the high-frequency (tuberous) and low-frequency (ampullary) electroreceptors may contribute. We describe an electrosensory orienting response to prey, whereby the fish rolls its body following detection to bring the prey above the dorsum. This orienting response and the spatial distribution of prey at the time of detection highlight the importance of the dorsal surface of the trunk for electrosensory signal acquisition. Finally, quantitative analysis of fish motion demonstrates that Apteronotus can adapt its trajectory to account for post-detection motion of the prey, suggesting that it uses a closed-loop adaptive tracking strategy, rather than an open-loop ballistic strike strategy, to intercept the prey.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document