scholarly journals Cell cycle-dependent processing of DNA lesions controls localization of Rad9 to sites of genotoxic stress

Cell Cycle ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1765-1774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniël O. Warmerdam ◽  
Raimundo Freire ◽  
Roland Kanaar ◽  
Veronique A.J. Smits
Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1265-1265
Author(s):  
Christine von Klitzing ◽  
Florian Bassermann ◽  
Stephan W. Morris ◽  
Christian Peschel ◽  
Justus Duyster

Abstract The nuclear interaction partner of ALK (NIPA) is a nuclear protein identified by our group in a screen for NPM-ALK interaction partners. We recently reported that NIPA is an F-box protein that assembles with SKP1, Cul1 and Roc1 to establish a novel SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. The formation of the SCFNIPA complex is regulated by cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of NIPA that restricts SCFNIPA assembly from G1- to late S-phase, thus allowing its substrates to be active from late S-phase throughout mitosis. Proteins involved in cell cycle regulation frequently play a role in DNA damage checkpoints. We therefore sought to determine whether NIPA has a function in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. For this reason we treated NIH/3T3 cells with various DNA-damaging agents. Surprisingly, we observed phosphorylation of NIPA in response to some of these agents, including UV radiation. This phosphorylation was cell cycle phase independent and thus independent of the physiological cell cycle dependent phosphorylation of NIPA. The relevant phosphorylation site is identical to the respective site in the course of cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of NIPA. Thus, phosphorylation of NIPA upon genotoxic stress would inactivate the SCFNIPA complex in a cell cycle independent manner. Interestingly, this phosphorylation site lies within a consensus site of the Chk1/Chk2 checkpoint kinases. These kinases are central to DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Chk1 is activated by ATR in response to blocked replication forks as they occur after treatment with UV. We performed experiments using the ATM/ATR inhibitor caffeine and the Chk1 inhibitor SB218078 to investigate a potential role of Chk1 in NIPA phosphorylation. Indeed, we found both inhibitors to prevent UV-induced phosphorylation of NIPA. Current experiments applying Chk1 knock-out cells will unravel the role of Chk1 in NIPA phosphorylation. Additional experiments were performed to investigate a function for NIPA in DNA-damage induced apoptosis. In this regard, we observed overexpression of NIPA WT to induce apoptosis in response to UV, whereas no proapoptotic effect was seen with the phosphorylation deficient NIPA mutant. Therefore, the phosphorylated form of NIPA may be involved in apoptotic signaling pathways. In summary, we present data suggesting a cell cycle independent function for NIPA. This activity is involved in DNA damage response and may be involved in regulating apoptosis upon genotoxic stress.


2015 ◽  
Vol 107 (12) ◽  
pp. 440-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Suchánková ◽  
Stanislav Kozubek ◽  
Soňa Legartová ◽  
Petra Sehnalová ◽  
Thomas Küntziger ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 635-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aprotim Mazumder ◽  
Katja Tummler ◽  
Mark Bathe ◽  
Leona D. Samson

ABSTRACTThe ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) enzyme catalyzes an essential step in the production of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) in cells. Bulk biochemical measurements in synchronizedSaccharomyces cerevisiaecells suggest thatRNRmRNA production is maximal in late G1and S phases; however, damaged DNA inducesRNRtranscription throughout the cell cycle. But suchen massemeasurements reveal neither cell-to-cell heterogeneity in responses nor direct correlations between transcript and protein expression or localization in single cells which may be central to function. We overcame these limitations by simultaneous detection of singleRNRtranscripts and also Rnr proteins in the same individual asynchronousS. cerevisiaecells, with and without DNA damage by methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Surprisingly, RNR subunit mRNA levels were comparably low in both damaged and undamaged G1cells and highly induced in damaged S/G2cells. Transcript numbers became correlated with both protein levels and localization only upon DNA damage in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Further, we showed that the differentialRNRresponse to DNA damage correlated with variable Mec1 kinase activity in the cell cycle in single cells. The transcription ofRNRgenes was found to be noisy and non-Poissonian in nature. Our results provide vital insight into cell cycle-dependent RNR regulation under conditions of genotoxic stress.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (17) ◽  
pp. 9558
Author(s):  
Naomie Gentric ◽  
Pascal Genschik ◽  
Sandra Noir

Due to their sessile lifestyle, plants are especially exposed to various stresses, including genotoxic stress, which results in altered genome integrity. Upon the detection of DNA damage, distinct cellular responses lead to cell cycle arrest and the induction of DNA repair mechanisms. Interestingly, it has been shown that some cell cycle regulators are not only required for meristem activity and plant development but are also key to cope with the occurrence of DNA lesions. In this review, we first summarize some important regulatory steps of the plant cell cycle and present a brief overview of the DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms. Then, the role played by some cell cycle regulators at the interface between the cell cycle and DNA damage responses is discussed more specifically.


1987 ◽  
Vol 116 (3_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S81
Author(s):  
U. VETTER ◽  
W. HARTMANN ◽  
H. HITZLER ◽  
W. HEIT ◽  
J. SCHLICKENRIEDER ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document