scholarly journals GA binding protein augments autophagy via transcriptional activation ofBECN1-PIK3C3complex genes

Autophagy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1622-1636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Zhu ◽  
Gayathri Swaminathan ◽  
Edward D Plowey
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ga Binding Protein

scholarly journals Phosphorylation-Elicited Quaternary Changes of GA Binding Protein in Transcriptional Activation

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 8008-8018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Sunesen ◽  
Monique Huchet-Dymanus ◽  
Morten O. Christensen ◽  
Jean-Pierre Changeux
Keyword(s):  
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cellular Localization ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Quaternary Structure ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Postsynaptic Membrane ◽  
Ga Binding Protein

ABSTRACT Enrichment of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) on the tip of the subjunctional folds of the postsynaptic membrane is a central event in the development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. This is attained, in part, through a selective transcription in the subsynaptic nuclei, and it has recently been shown that the GA binding protein (GABP) plays an important role in this compartmentalized expression. The neural factor heregulin (HRG) activates nAChR transcription in cultured cells by stimulating a signaling cascade of protein kinases. Hence, it is speculated that GABP becomes activated by phosphorylation, but the mechanism has remained elusive. To fully understand the consequences of GABP phosphorylation, we examined the effect of heregulin-elicited GABP phosphorylation on cellular localization, DNA binding, transcription, and mobility. We demonstrate that HRG-elicited phosphorylation dramatically changes the transcriptional activity and mobility of GABP. While phosphorylation of GABPβ seems to be dispensable for these changes, phosphorylation of GABPα is crucial. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we furthermore showed that phosphorylation of threonine 280 in GABPα triggers reorganizations of the quaternary structure of GABP. Taken together, these results support a model in which phosphorylation-elicited structural changes of GABP enable engagement in certain interactions leading to transcriptional activation.

scholarly journals XrpFI, an amphibian transcription factor composed of multiple polypeptides immunologically related to the GA-binding protein alpha and beta subunits, is differentially expressed during Xenopus laevis development.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 6479-6489 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Marchioni ◽  
S Morabito ◽  
A L Salvati ◽  
E Beccari ◽  
F Carnevali
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Oocyte ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Ga Binding Protein

XrpFI, first identified in the extract of Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei, binds to a proximal sequence of the L14 ribosomal protein gene promoter. Its target sequence, 5'-TAACCGGAAGTTTGT-3', is required to fully activate the promoter, and the two G's of the central motif are essential for factor binding and transcriptional activation; our data also suggest that XrpFI may play a role in cap site positioning. The binding site of XrpFI is homologous to the sequence recognized by the family of ets genes. Antibodies specific for Ets-1 and Ets-2 proteins did not react with XrpFI, but those raised against the rat alpha and beta GA-binding proteins both supershifted the retarded bands formed by XrpFI. The Xenopus polypeptides related to GA-binding protein alpha interact with DNA both as monomers and as heterodimers associated with beta-related proteins. Oocyte nuclei contain multiple forms of alpha- and beta-related proteins: the alpha-like proteins remain throughout development, while the pattern of the beta species changes in the embryonic stages examined. beta-like proteins are undetectable in the cleavage period up to the neurula stage, but at later stages, when ribosomal protein genes are actively transcribed, two beta-related polypeptides reappear.

XrpFI, an amphibian transcription factor composed of multiple polypeptides immunologically related to the GA-binding protein alpha and beta subunits, is differentially expressed during Xenopus laevis development

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 6479-6489
Author(s):  
M Marchioni ◽  
S Morabito ◽  
A L Salvati ◽  
E Beccari ◽  
F Carnevali
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Oocyte ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Related Proteins ◽  
Ga Binding Protein

XrpFI, first identified in the extract of Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclei, binds to a proximal sequence of the L14 ribosomal protein gene promoter. Its target sequence, 5'-TAACCGGAAGTTTGT-3', is required to fully activate the promoter, and the two G's of the central motif are essential for factor binding and transcriptional activation; our data also suggest that XrpFI may play a role in cap site positioning. The binding site of XrpFI is homologous to the sequence recognized by the family of ets genes. Antibodies specific for Ets-1 and Ets-2 proteins did not react with XrpFI, but those raised against the rat alpha and beta GA-binding proteins both supershifted the retarded bands formed by XrpFI. The Xenopus polypeptides related to GA-binding protein alpha interact with DNA both as monomers and as heterodimers associated with beta-related proteins. Oocyte nuclei contain multiple forms of alpha- and beta-related proteins: the alpha-like proteins remain throughout development, while the pattern of the beta species changes in the embryonic stages examined. beta-like proteins are undetectable in the cleavage period up to the neurula stage, but at later stages, when ribosomal protein genes are actively transcribed, two beta-related polypeptides reappear.

scholarly journals The E-box DNA binding protein Sgc1p suppresses thegcr2mutation, which is involved in transcriptional activation of glycolytic genes inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

FEBS Letters ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 463 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sato ◽  
M.Cecilia Lopez ◽  
Shigemi Sugioka ◽  
Yoshifumi Jigami ◽  
Henry V. Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
E Box

scholarly journals A direct role for C/EBP and the AP-I-binding site in gene expression linked to adipocyte differentiation.

1989 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5331-5339 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Herrera ◽  
H S Ro ◽  
G S Robinson ◽  
K G Xanthopoulos ◽  
B M Spiegelman
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Adipocyte Differentiation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase ◽  
Lipid Binding ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
New Genes ◽  
Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase Gene

Adipocyte differentiation is accompanied by the transcriptional activation of many new genes, including the gene encoding adipocyte P2 (aP2), an intracellular lipid-binding protein. Using specific deletions and point mutations, we have shown that at least two distinct sequence elements in the aP2 promoter contribute to the expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in chimeric constructions transfected into adipose cells. An AP-I site at -120, shown earlier to bind Jun- and Fos-like proteins, serves as a positive regulator of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression in adipocytes but is specifically silenced by adjacent upstream sequences in preadipocytes. Sequences upstream of the AP-I site at -140 (termed AE-1) can function as an enhancer in both cell types when linked to a viral promoter but can stimulate expression only in fat cells in the intact aP2 promoter. The AE-1 sequence binds an adipocyte protein identical or very closely related to an enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) that has been previously implicated in the regulation of several liver-specific genes. A functional role for C/EBP in the regulation of the aP2 gene is indicated by the facts that C/EBP mRNA is induced during adipocyte differentiation and the aP2 promoter is transactivated by cotransfection of a C/EBP expression vector into preadipose cells. These results indicate that sequences that bind C/EBP and the Fos-Jun complex play major roles in the expression of the aP2 gene during adipocyte differentiation and demonstrate that C/EBP can directly regulate cellular gene expression.

scholarly journals GA-Binding Protein Is Dispensable for Neuromuscular Synapse Formation and Synapse-Specific Gene Expression

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 5040-5046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Jaworski ◽  
Cynthia L. Smith ◽  
Steven J. Burden
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Neuromuscular Synapse ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Muscle Gene Expression ◽  
Synaptic Region ◽  
Ga Binding Protein

ABSTRACT The mRNAs encoding postsynaptic components at the neuromuscular junction are concentrated in the synaptic region of muscle fibers. Accumulation of these RNAs in the synaptic region is mediated, at least in part, by selective transcription of the corresponding genes in synaptic myofiber nuclei. The transcriptional mechanisms that are responsible for synapse-specific gene expression are largely unknown, but an Ets site in the promoter regions of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) subunit genes and other “synaptic” genes is required for synapse-specific transcription. The Ets domain transcription factor GA-binding protein (GABP) has been implicated to mediate synapse-specific gene expression. Inactivation of GABPα, the DNA-binding subunit of GABP, leads to early embryonic lethality, preventing analysis of synapse formation in gabpα mutant mice. To study the role of GABP at neuromuscular synapses, we conditionally inactivated gabpα in skeletal muscle and studied synaptic differentiation and muscle gene expression. Although expression of rb, a target of GABP, is elevated in muscle tissue deficient in GABPα, clustering of synaptic AChRs at synapses and synapse-specific gene expression are normal in these mice. These data indicate that GABP is dispensable for synapse-specific transcription and maintenance of normal AChR expression at synapses.

UV stimulation induces nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) DNA-binding activity but not transcriptional activation

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Campbell ◽  
N. R. Chapman ◽  
N. D. Perkins
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Nuclear Factor Κb ◽  
Camp Response Element Binding ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Nuclear Factor ◽  
Dna Binding Activity

The cellular response to DNA-damaging agents is partly mediated by DNA-binding transcription factors such as p53 and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). Typically NF-κB activation is associated with resistance to apoptosis. Following stimulation with UV light however, NF-κB activation has been shown to be required for programmed cell death. To study this effect further and to determine the relationship between NF-κB and p53 function, we have examined the effect of UV light on U2OS cells. UV stimulation resulted in the activation of NF-κB DNA-binding and the induction of p53. Surprisingly, and in contrast with tumour necrosis factor α stimulation, this UV-induced NF-κB was transcriptionally inert. These observations suggest a model in which the NF-κB switch from an anti-apoptotic to a pro-apoptotic role within the cell results from modulation of its ability to stimulate gene expression, possibly as a result of the ability of p53 to sequester transcriptional co-activator proteins such as p300/CREB (cAMP-response-element-binding protein)-binding protein.

c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6021-6029
Author(s):  
R Metz ◽  
A J Bannister ◽  
J A Sutherland ◽  
C Hagemeier ◽  
E C O'Rourke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
Tata Box Binding Protein

Transcriptional activation in eukaryotes involves protein-protein interactions between regulatory transcription factors and components of the basal transcription machinery. Here we show that c-Fos, but not a related protein, Fra-1, can bind the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) both in vitro and in vivo and that c-Fos can also interact with the transcription factor IID complex. High-affinity binding to TBP requires c-Fos activation modules which cooperate to activate transcription. One of these activation modules contains a TBP-binding motif (TBM) which was identified through its homology to TBP-binding viral activators. This motif is required for transcriptional activation, as well as TBP binding. Domain swap experiments indicate that a domain containing the TBM can confer TBP binding on Fra-1 both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo activation experiments indicate that a GAL4-Fos fusion can activate a promoter bearing a GAL4 site linked to a TATA box but that this activity does not occur at high concentrations of GAL4-Fos. This inhibition (squelching) of c-Fos activity is relieved by the presence of excess TBP, indicating that TBP is a direct functional target of c-Fos. Removing the TBM from c-Fos severely abrogates activation of a promoter containing a TATA box but does not affect activation of a promoter driven only by an initiator element. Collectively, these results suggest that c-Fos is able to activate via two distinct mechanisms, only one of which requires contact with TBP. Since TBP binding is not exhibited by Fra-1, TBP-mediated activation may be one characteristic that discriminates the function of Fos-related proteins.

scholarly journals Recruitment of TATA-Binding Protein–TAFI Complex SL1 to the Human Ribosomal DNA Promoter Is Mediated by the Carboxy-Terminal Activation Domain of Upstream Binding Factor (UBF) and Is Regulated by UBF Phosphorylation

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 2872-2879 ◽  
Author(s):  
JoAnn C. Tuan ◽  
Weiguo Zhai ◽  
Lucio Comai
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Direct Contact ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Rrna Synthesis ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Upstream Binding Factor ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

ABSTRACT Human rRNA synthesis by RNA polymerase I requires at least two auxiliary factors, upstream binding factor (UBF) and SL1. UBF is a DNA binding protein with multiple HMG domains that binds directly to the CORE and UCE elements of the ribosomal DNA promoter. The carboxy-terminal region of UBF is necessary for transcription activation and has been shown to be extensively phosphorylated. SL1, which consists of TATA-binding protein (TBP) and three associated factors (TAFIs), does not have any sequence-specific DNA binding activity, and its recruitment to the promoter is mediated by specific protein interactions with UBF. Once on the promoter, the SL1 complex makes direct contact with the DNA promoter and directs promoter-specific initiation of transcription. To investigate the mechanism of UBF-dependent transcriptional activation, we first performed protein-protein interaction assays between SL1 and a series of UBF deletion mutants. This analysis indicated that the carboxy-terminal domain of UBF, which is necessary for transcriptional activation, makes direct contact with the TBP-TAFI complex SL1. Since this region of UBF can be phosphorylated, we then tested whether this modification plays a functional role in the interaction with SL1. Alkaline phosphatase treatment of UBF completely abolished the ability of UBF to interact with SL1; moreover, incubation of the dephosphorylated UBF with nuclear extracts from exponentially growing cells was able to restore the UBF-SL1 interaction. In addition, DNase I footprinting analysis and in vitro-reconstituted transcription assays with phosphatase-treated UBF provided further evidence that UBF phosphorylation plays a critical role in the regulation of the recruitment of SL1 to the ribosomal DNA promoter and stimulation of UBF-dependent transcription.

scholarly journals Regulation of the germinal center gene program by interferon (IFN) regulatory factor 8/IFN consensus sequence-binding protein

2005 ◽  
Vol 203 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Hoon Lee ◽  
Mark Melchers ◽  
Hongsheng Wang ◽  
Ted A. Torrey ◽  
Rebecca Slota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Germinal Center ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Regulatory Factor

Interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein/IFN regulatory factor 8 (IRF8) is a transcription factor that regulates the differentiation and function of macrophages, granulocytes, and dendritic cells through activation or repression of target genes. Although IRF8 is also expressed in lymphocytes, its roles in B cell and T cell maturation or function are ill defined, and few transcriptional targets are known. Gene expression profiling of human tonsillar B cells and mouse B cell lymphomas showed that IRF8 transcripts were expressed at highest levels in centroblasts, either from secondary lymphoid tissue or transformed cells. In addition, staining for IRF8 was most intense in tonsillar germinal center (GC) dark-zone centroblasts. To discover B cell genes regulated by IRF8, we transfected purified primary tonsillar B cells with enhanced green fluorescent protein–tagged IRF8, generated small interfering RNA knockdowns of IRF8 expression in a mouse B cell lymphoma cell line, and examined the effects of a null mutation of IRF8 on B cells. Each approach identified activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AICDA) and BCL6 as targets of transcriptional activation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated in vivo occupancy of 5′ sequences of both genes by IRF8 protein. These results suggest previously unappreciated roles for IRF8 in the transcriptional regulation of B cell GC reactions that include direct regulation of AICDA and BCL6.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document