scholarly journals Glycemic Control After Hospital Discharge in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Pilot Study of Daily Remote Glucose Monitoring

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Wei ◽  
David Nathan ◽  
Deborah Wexler
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Glucose Monitoring

scholarly journals Acute Effect of Acupuncture on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sérgio Vencio ◽  
Isabela Caiado-Vencio ◽  
Adriana Caiado ◽  
Douglas Morgental ◽  
Luisa Soares Dantas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Acute Effect

scholarly journals Portable Gentle Jogger Improves Glycemic Indices in Type 2 Diabetic and Healthy Subjects Living at Home: A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose A. Adams ◽  
Veronica Banderas ◽  
Jose R. Lopez ◽  
Marvin A. Sackner
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Physical Inactivity ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Type 2 Diabetics ◽  
Glycemic Indices

Background. Physical inactivity is a high-risk factor for type 2 diabetes. Increased physical activity improves indices of glycemic control. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) allows the investigation of glycemic control during activities of daily living. A pilot study was undertaken to determine the effects of the portable Gentle Jogger (passive simulated jogging device (JD)) that decreases physical inactivity by effortlessly producing body movements on glycemic indices of healthy and type 2 diabetes subjects using CGM during activities of daily living. Methods. A single-arm, nonblinded study was carried out in 22 volunteers (11 type 2 diabetics and 11 healthy subjects), using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 14 days. On day 4, subjects were provided with JD and instructed to use it a minimum of 3 times per day for 30 min for 7 days. CGM data was analyzed at baseline (BL) and during 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days of JD (JD 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and 1-2-day post JD (Post JD1 and 2) and the following 24 hr indices computed mean glucose (mGLu), SUM of all glucose values, % coefficient of variation (%CV), area under the 24-hour curve (AUC), time spent above range (TAR, glucose 180-250 mg/dl), and time in range (TIR). Results. In healthy subjects, there were significantly lower values of mGlu and SUM compared to BL for all days of JD usage. In type 2 diabetics, mGlu, SUM, and AUC were significantly lower compared to BL, for all days of JD usage and Post JD1. TAR was significantly lower and TIR significantly improved during JD, in type 2 diabetics without change in %CV. Conclusion. Gentle Jogger is a portable, passive movement technology that reduces physical inactivity while improving 24 hr glycemic control. It can be self-administered as a standalone device or as an adjunct to diabetic medications. This trial is registered with NCT03550105.

The effect of brief intermittent stair climbing on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 969-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Elizabeth Godkin ◽  
Elizabeth M. Jenkins ◽  
Jonathan P. Little ◽  
Zafreen Nazarali ◽  
Michael E. Percival ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Stair Climbing ◽  
Men 2

We examined the effect of brief intermittent stair climbing exercise on glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes (n = 7, 5 men; 2 women; age, 21–70 years). The protocol involved three 60-s bouts of vigorously ascending and slowly descending a flight of stairs. Mean 24-h blood glucose was unchanged after an acute session (p = 0.43) and following 18 sessions over 6 weeks (p = 0.13). The protocol was well tolerated by participants but seemingly insufficient to alter glycemic control.

941-P: Frequency of Blood Glucose Monitoring in Relation to Medical Cost and Glycemic Control in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 941-P
Author(s):  
LEI ZHANG ◽  
YAN GU ◽  
YUXIU YANG ◽  
NA WANG ◽  
WEIGUO GAO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Medical Cost ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring

973-P: The Feasibility of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Study

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 973-P
Author(s):  
ALLISON LAROCHE ◽  
KRISTINA UTZSCHNEIDER ◽  
CATHERINE PIHOKER
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring

2180-PUB: Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes Self-Management Education for Type 2 Diabetes Improves Glycemic Control

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2180-PUB
Author(s):  
ADDIE L. FORTMANN ◽  
ALESSANDRA BASTIAN ◽  
CODY J. LENSING ◽  
SHANE HOVERSTEN ◽  
KIMBERLY LUU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Management Education ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Self Management

Personalized Behavioral Nutrition Intervention in Older Asian Americans with Type 2 Diabetes during COVID-19 Pandemic: Study Protocol for a Pilot, Hybrid, Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jisook Ko ◽  
Yan Du ◽  
Rozmin Jiwani ◽  
Chengdong Li ◽  
Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Asian Americans ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Behavioral Nutrition

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the in-person-based self-management approach (i.e., face-to-face or group approach) of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Older adults with T2D, including Asian Americans (AAs), have experienced worsening of diabetes control due to various reasons, including uncertainty of continuous access to essential diabetes medications, devices, education, limited health literacy, as well as constant anxiety and stress. Hybrid clinical trials that incorporate virtual elements into the in-person-based study could provide these vulnerable populations with accessible and timely interventions OBJECTIVE The primary aims of this pilot study are to determine (1) the effect of personalized behavioral nutrition (PBN) intervention on glycemic control, weight control, and metabolites profiles; and (2) the acceptability of PBN. to enhance glycemic control using personalized behavioral nutrition. METHODS Participants will be recruited with a web-based registry, advertisements in ethnic newspapers, and social network services popular among AAs. A total of 60 AAs, aged 65 years or older, who are descendants of Chinese, Korean, or South Asian, and have a diagnosis of T2D will be randomized into two groups: a PBN group (n=30) and a control group (n=30). A 4-week PBN intervention comprises three components: 1) digital self-monitoring; 2) personal nutrition change goals and recommendations; and 3) diabetes nutrition educations. All participants will complete digital self-monitoring on diet, physical activity, and blood glucose. In addition, all participants will access an interactive digital platform to track their self-monitoring data and communicate with the research team. The effectiveness and acceptability of implementing the intervention will be assessed. RESULTS Funding support and institutional review board approval for this study have been secured. Data collection started in August 2020 and is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first study to determine the effectiveness and acceptability of PBN utilizing a metabolomics approach and digital-assisted intervention with hybrid RCT among older AAs. The findings of this pilot study will inform the development of a full-scale PBN protocol and hybrid clinical trials that can be adapted for people with T2D in the ongoing pandemic.

scholarly journals The effects of professional continuous glucose monitoring as an adjuvant educational tool for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dulce Adelaida Rivera-Ávila ◽  
Alejandro Iván Esquivel-Lu ◽  
Carlos Rafael Salazar-Lozano ◽  
Kyla Jones ◽  
Svetlana V. Doubova
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Educational Tool ◽  
Study Objective ◽  
Hba1c Levels

Abstract Background The study objective was to evaluate the effects of professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as an adjuvant educational tool for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods We conducted a three-month quasi-experimental study with an intervention (IGr) and control group (CGr) and ex-ante and ex-post evaluations in one family medicine clinic in Mexico City. Participants were T2D patients with HbA1c > 8% attending a comprehensive diabetes care program. In addition to the program, the IGr wore a professional CGM sensor (iPro™2) during the first 7 days of the study. Following this period, IGr participants had a medical consultation for the CGM results and treatment adjustments. Additionally, they received an educational session and personalized diet plan from a dietitian. After 3 months, the IGr again wore the CGM sensor for 1 week. The primary outcome variable was HbA1c level measured at baseline and 3 months after the CGM intervention. We analyzed the effect of the intervention on HbA1c levels by estimating the differences-in-differences treatment effect (Diff-in-Diff). Additionally, baseline and three-month CGM and dietary information were recorded for the IGr and analyzed using the Student’s paired t-test and mixed-effects generalized linear models to control for patients’ baseline characteristics. Results Overall, 302 T2D patients participated in the study (IGr, n = 150; control, n = 152). At the end of the three-month follow-up, we observed 0.439 mean HbA1C difference between groups (p = 0.004), with an additional decrease in HbA1c levels in the IGr compared with the CGr (Diff-in-Diff HbA1c mean of − 0.481% points, p = 0.023). Moreover, compared with the baseline, the three-month CGM patterns showed a significant increase in the percentage of time in glucose range (+ 7.25; p = 0.011); a reduction in the percentage of time above 180 mg/dl (− 6.01; p = 0.045), a decrease in glycemic variability (− 3.94, p = 0.034); and improvements in dietary patterns, shown by a reduction in total caloric intake (− 197.66 Kcal/day; p = 0.0001). Conclusion Professional CGM contributes to reducing HbA1c levels and is an adjuvant educational tool that can improve glycemic control in patients with T2D. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04667728. Registered 16/12/2020

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document