USE OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS TO CHARACTERIZE A RARE DISEASE IN THE U.S.: TREATMENT, COMORBIDITIES, AND FOLLOW-UP TRENDS AMONG PATIENTS WITH A CONFIRMED DIAGNOSIS OF ACROMEGALY

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Silverstein ◽  
Erin D. Roe ◽  
Kashif M. Munir ◽  
Janet L. Fox ◽  
Birol Emir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Rare Disease ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The U.S

Applying institutional theory to the adoption of electronic health records in the U.S.

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 570-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Sherer ◽  
Chad D. Meyerhoefer ◽  
Lizhong Peng
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Institutional Theory ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Electronic health record note review in an outpatient specialty clinic: who is looking?

JAMIA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy S Chen ◽  
Michelle R Hribar ◽  
Isaac H Goldstein ◽  
Adam Rule ◽  
Wei-Chun Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Office Visit ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Ancillary Staff ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Note entry and review in electronic health records (EHRs) are time-consuming. While some clinics have adopted team-based models of note entry, how these models have impacted note review is unknown in outpatient specialty clinics such as ophthalmology. We hypothesized that ophthalmologists and ancillary staff review very few notes. Using audit log data from 9775 follow-up office visits in an academic ophthalmology clinic, we found ophthalmologists reviewed a median of 1 note per visit (2.6 ± 5.3% of available notes), while ancillary staff reviewed a median of 2 notes per visit (4.1 ± 6.2% of available notes). While prior ophthalmic office visit notes were the most frequently reviewed note type, ophthalmologists and staff reviewed no such notes in 51% and 31% of visits, respectively. These results highlight the collaborative nature of note review and raise concerns about how cumbersome EHR designs affect efficient note review and the utility of prior notes in ophthalmic clinical care.

Improving Follow-Up of Abnormal Cancer Screens Using Electronic Health Records

2013 ◽  
pp. 297-309
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh ◽  
Lindsey Wilson ◽  
Laura Petersen ◽  
Mona Sawhney ◽  
Brian Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hardeep Singh ◽  
Lindsey Wilson ◽  
Laura A Petersen ◽  
Mona K Sawhney ◽  
Brian Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Test Result
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document