COMPARISON OF TWO SOIL-WATER MODELS UNDER SEMI-ARID GROWING CONDITIONS
The Versatile Soil Moisture Budget (VSMB) and the Soil-Plant-Air-Water (SPAW) model were compared and tested against soil-water content data from a long-term experiment in which wheat was grown on fallow land in the semi-arid zone of Saskatchewan. Both models were driven by daily air temperatures and precipitation data. At the expense of requiring more detailed soil and crop information, the SPAW model simulated the water balance and its components in greater detail than the VSMB. Predictions of soil-water contents throughout the growing season with either model corresponded very well with the measured data. The overall mean absolute difference in total soil-water content to a depth of 120 cm was 1.5 cm for the VSMB and 1.2 cm for the SPAW model. Predictions of water distribution in the profile were also satisfactory. A choice between the two models, to be used under semi-arid growing conditions, will depend on the availability of input data and the required level of output. Key words: Soil-water movement, modelling, evapotranspiration