GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION OF THE TOTAL SULFUR CONTENT OF FORAGES GROWN IN NORTHWESTERN MANITOBA

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 869-872
Author(s):  
R. J. BOILA ◽  
T. J. DEVLIN ◽  
K. M. WITTENBERG

In a forage survey of northwestern Manitoba, total sulfur (S) in grass (n = 600) and legume (n = 262) samples ranged from less than 0.1 to as high as 7.8 g kg−1 dry matter (DM) with mean concentrations in the range of 2.0–2.7 and 2.5–3.4 g kg−1 DM, respectively. Deficiencies of total S for cattle are more likely to occur with grasses while excesses are more likely to occur with legumes. Excessive concentrations of total S, in addition to high or excessive molybdenum in forages, may contribute to the hypocupremia encountered in cattle herds throughout Northwestern Manitoba. Identification of locations where forages may contain excessive total S and/or molybdenum aids in the development of forage and livestock management programs necessary to prevent or reverse hypocupremia in cattle herds. Key words: Forages, sulfur, cattle, copper, molybdenum, northwestern Manitoba

1947 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 315-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Morley ◽  
J. R. Scott

Abstract From the experiments described, it appears that neither the bromine method nor the nitric acid method is perfectly satisfactory, for the following reasons. (1) Neither method gives the true free sulfur in rubbers containing sulfur-bearing accelerators, as these cause positive errors of anything up to 0.2–0.3 per cent. (2) The nitric acid method does not give the true free sulfur in rubbers, without sulfur-bearing accelerators, because the result includes some of the sulfur combined with the rubber “resins” the tests do not show definitely whether this applies also to the bromine method. (3) Neither method gives the total sulfur in the acetone extract, since some of the sulfur combined with the “resins” is not included in the result; the presence of certain sulfur-bearing accelerators increases the error. The statement previously referred to (loc. cit.), that the bromine method approximates more nearly to the elementary sulfur content and the nitric acid method more nearly to the total sulfur content of the extract, appears to be a correct generalization. In most cases, however, the difference between the results obtained by the two methods would be less than 0.1 per cent. In respect of simplicity and rapidity of working, the bromine method has the advantage over the nitric acid method, and therefore in all ordinary circumstances is the one to be recommended.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Beny Wiranata ◽  
Hendra Amijaya ◽  
Ferian Anggara ◽  
Agung Rizki Perdana ◽  
Oyinta Fatma Isnadiyati ◽  
...  

Tanjung Formation is one of the major coal-bearing deposit in the Barito Basin, Central Kalimantan. The distribution of total sulfur and ash yield in coal is closely related to the depositional environment. This study was to determine the total sulfur and ash yield and the interpretation of the dynamics of depositional process. Coal seam A and B generally have low to medium ash yield 2.82 to 9.23 (wt.%, db) and low total sulfur content of <1 (wt.%, db), except for the 6PLY1 coal sample which has total sulfur content that relatively high at 1.55 (wt.%, db). Coal samples 5PLY1A, 5PLY1B, 5PLY3, 5PLY5, 6PLY2, 6PLY4, 6PLY5, 6PLY7, and 6PLY9 which have low to medium ash yield and low total sulfur content <1% (wt.%, db) are formed in the topogeneous mire (freshwater swamp) in a fluvial environment. The total sulfur content was interpreted to be derived mainly from the parent plant materials. Meanwhile, the 6PLY1 coal sample which has an ash yield of 5.83 (wt.%, db) and total sulfur content of 1.55 (wt.%, db) formed in topogeneous mire in an environment that is invaded by sea water, and the total sulfur content were interpreted coming from the parent plant materials and the effect of seawater invasion which is rich in sulfate (SO4) compounds. It is also supported by the occurrence of syngenetic mineral content (framboidal pyrite) and epigenetic pyrite of 1.23 (vol.%).


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasilije Manovic ◽  
Borislav Grubor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document