THE GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION OF MUSCLE IN BULLS AND HEIFERS OF TWO BREEDS

1980 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. M. JONES ◽  
M. A. PRICE ◽  
R. T. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Weight Distribution ◽  
Growth Pattern ◽  
Muscle Growth ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Growth Coefficient ◽  
Breed Type ◽  
Breed Differences

A trial is reported comparing muscle growth and distribution in 12 bulls and 12 heifers of each of two breed-types: Hereford (HE) and Dairy Synthetic (DY). Serial slaughter was carried out from weaning (163 ± 15.1 days) to approximately 15 mo of age. After slaughter, the left side of each carcass was broken into quarters and then eight wholesale cuts, which were separated into fat, muscle and bone. The growth pattern of muscle in each cut relative to total side muscle was estimated from the growth coefficient, b, in the allometric equation (Y = aXb). Growth coefficients were homogeneous among breeds and sexes, indicating that neither breed nor sex influenced relative muscle growth. Some significant (P < 0.05), though minor, sex and breed differences were found when muscle weight distribution was adjusted to constant side muscle weight. Notably DY heifers had significantly (P < 0.05) more muscle in the high-priced cuts (sum of round, sirloin, loin and rib) than either HE heifers or bulls of either breed-type. When muscle weight was adjusted to constant side weight, bulls were found to have a greater weight of muscle in the high-priced cuts than heifers, and DY animals to have more than HE animals.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF BREED AND SEX ON THE PATTERNS OF FAT DEPOSITION AND DISTRIBUTION IN SWINE

1980 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. M. JONES ◽  
R. J. RICHMOND ◽  
M. A. PRICE ◽  
R. B. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Subcutaneous Fat ◽  
Fat Distribution ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Constant Weight ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Sex Type ◽  
Breed Differences

The growth and distribution of fat from 163 pig carcasses were compared among five breeds (Duroc × Yorkshire (D × Y), Hampshire × Yorkshire (H × Y), Yorkshire (Y × Y), Yorkshire × Lacombe-Yorkshire (Y × L-Y) and Lacombe × Yorkshire (L × Y)) and two sex-types (barrows and gilts) over a wide range in carcass weight. The growth pattern of fat and the fat depots were estimated from the allometric equation (Y = aXb) using side muscle weight and side fat weight separately as independent variables. Growth coefficients (b) for intermuscular and subcutaneous fat depots were similar for the hindquarter but the intermuscular depot coefficient was slightly higher for the forequarter. The coefficient for body cavity fat was highest in all comparisons. No significant differences were detected for coefficients among breeds and between sexes using both total muscle and total side fat as independent variables. Significant breed and sex-type differences were found in the fat depots at a constant weight of side muscle. This would indicate that breed differences in fatness seemed to be more influenced by the initiation of fattening at different muscle weights than by any inherent differences in rate of fattening. Significant breed differences were also found in the fat depots at a constant fat weight, indicating that breed may influence fat distribution. Sex-type had no effect on fat distribution when the evaluation was made at constant fatness.

Muscle growth and distribution of muscle weight in Clun and Southdown sheep

1987 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. W. Butler-Hogg ◽  
O. P. Whelehan
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Growth ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Relative Growth ◽  
Relative Growth Rates ◽  
Fat Depots ◽  
Muscle Groups ◽  
Total Muscle

ABSTRACTA total of 56 sheep, 28 Clun and 28 Southdown were slaughtered, five of each breed, at birth, 50, 100, 150 and 200 days and three of each breed at 415 days of age. The left half of each carcass was separated anatomically into individual muscles, bones and fat depots. For the purposes of analysis, individual muscles were assigned to one of eight muscle groups, depending upon their anatomical location.The relative growth of some individual muscles was found to change over this age range, as indicated by a significant squared term in the quadratic allometric equation: this was true for proportionately 0·33 of the muscles in Clun and for proportionately 0·44 of those in Southdown, accounting for proportionately 0·33 and 0·47 of total muscle weight in Clun and Southdown respectively.Principal components analysis (PCA) was used to derive the multivariate analogue of the quadratic part of quadratic allometry: the sign of the loading on the second principal component had the same sign as the change observed in bq, the quadratic relative growth coefficient. Thus, PCA offers the potential to identify simultaneously, and independently of shape or conformation, all those muscles whose relative growth coefficients change over the period examined. It could be applied successfully to breed comparisons of conformation.The cumulative effects of changing relative growth rates of muscles were small. Muscle weight distribution appears to be almost fixed within the first few weeks after birth. Despite their differences in conformation and mature size, Clun and Southdown lambs had similar distributions of muscle weight at the same age; the high valued muscles constituted 513·8 g/kg total muscle in Clun and 514·7 g/kg total muscle in Southdown lambs at 200 days of age.

scholarly journals Muscle weight distribution in four breeds of cattle with reference to individual muscles, anatomical groups and wholesale cuts

1976 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D. Charles ◽  
E. R. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Weight Distribution ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Percentage Distribution ◽  
Breed Differences ◽  
Different Types

SummaryOne side of each of 51 carcasses of Hereford, Angus, Friesian and Charolais cross-bred steers was dissected and the weights of individual muscles and total carcass muscle were obtained. The percentage distribution of total carcass muscle weight in muscles and in. standard groups of muscles was determined. In addition, the percentage distribution of total carcass muscle weight in wholesale cuts was determined from the weights of whole and part muscles specified as comprising the respective cuts.Minor breed differences only were found in muscle weight distribution among muscles, groups of muscles and wholesale cuts. Similarity of muscle weight distribution in the different types of carcasses studied shows that carcass shape is not associated with differences in the distribution of muscle weight in wholesale cuts.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF BREED AND SEX ON THE RELATIVE GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION OF BONE IN CATTLE

1978 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D.M. JONES ◽  
M. A. PRICE ◽  
R. T. BERG
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Growth Pattern ◽  
Bone Growth ◽  
Lumbar Vertebrae ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Growth Coefficient ◽  
Relative Growth ◽  
Limb Bones ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Equal Side

The relative growth and distribution of bone from 256 bovine carcasses were compared among three breed-types (British, up to 30% Charolais and 30–50% Charolais) and three "sexes" (heifers, steers and bulls) over a wide range in carcass weight. The growth pattern for each bone relative to total side bone was estimated from the growth coefficient, b, in the allometric equation (Y = aXb). Growth coefficients were homogeneous among both breed-types and sexes for each bone relative to total side bone, indicating that different breeds and sexes followed similar patterns of relative bone growth as they increased in size. The lowest growth coefficients in the carcass were found in the neck and limb bones all of which had growth coefficients significantly less than 1.0. The thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and the sternum had growth coefficients not significantly different from 1.0 and the ribs, pelvic and pectoral girdles had growth coefficients significantly greater than 1.0. Significant breed-type and "sex" differences were found in the weights of individual bones when adjusted to equal side bone weight. However, these were small and probably reflected differences in stage of maturity.

Influence of breed and sex on muscle weight distribution of cattle

1973 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Mukhoty ◽  
R. T. Berg
Keyword(s):  
Weight Distribution ◽  
General Trend ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
Abdominal Muscles ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Sex Influence ◽  
Differential Development ◽  
Breed Differences ◽  
Pelvic Limb ◽  
Total Muscle

SummaryIn this experiment an attempt was made to study the influence of breed and sex on the muscle-weight distribution of cattle. The weights of individual muscles obtained by total dissection from the side of a carcass from each of 63 bulls, 106 steers and 22 heifers representing six, eight and two breed groups respectively were classified into nine anatomical groups using the method of Butterfield (1963). Muscle-weight distribution was then studied by expressing the muscle in each of these groups as percentages of total muscle and also as adjusted mean weight of muscle in each region while statistically adjusting total muscle to a constant level.Results indicated that breed differences were significant although small for abdominal muscles and muscles of the neck region within bulls and steers, but two breed groups of heifers did not differ. There was no detectable breed influence on the percentage of any other muscle group. Percentages of muscles classified as expensive were found to be remarkably similar among breed groups in all three sexes.Sex influences on muscle distribution were also appraised. There was a general trend of heifers having a higher percentage in the proximal pelvic limb and abdominal areas than steers, while steers exceeded bulls. This order of sex influence was reversed in the muscles of the neck and thorax region. The influence of sex was conspicuous in areas classified as having expensive muscles, with heifers having a higher percentage of muscles in the high-priced regions than steers and steers being superior to bulls. Sex differences reflect the differential development of bulls compared with the other sexes as they mature. Muscles of the neck and thorax in bulls increase in proportion and other groups (proximal hind and abdominal) decrease. The differentiation of muscles represents a trend toward masculinity from heifer to steer to young bull and finally to old bull proportions.

The growth of individual muscles and bones in the red deer

1986 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wenham ◽  
K. Pennie
Keyword(s):  
Red Deer ◽  
Anatomical Variation ◽  
Lumbar Vertebrae ◽  
Quadratic Function ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Appendicular Skeleton ◽  
Regression Equations ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Growth Coefficient

ABSTRACTFourteen red deer, three hinds and 11 stags, ranging from birth (8·8 kg) to 10 years of age (143·4 kg), were slaughtered and the carcasses dissected into individual muscles and bones.Regression equations relating the actual weight of each component or group of components to independent variables such as age, live weight, carcass weight, total muscle weight or total bone weight were fitted to the data, the majority of which satisfactorily conformed to simple allometric relationships. Twenty of the muscles and one muscle group exhibited a pattern of growth which was better described by the inclusion of a quadratic function. The description of the data using an additional term in the allometric equation was considered to be more biologically sound than the often-used practice of fitting different coefficients to the logarithmic form of the allometric equation for each stage of growth. The group of muscles surrounding the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and those of the abdominal wall were the fastest growing, both having a growth coefficient of 1·08 with standard errors (s.e.) of 0·013 and 0·017 respectively. The slowest growth was found in the distal forelimb group of muscles (growth coefficient = 0·84, s.e. 0015), no individual muscle in this group having a growth coefficient greater than 0·9.The bones of the axial' skeleton increased in weight faster than those of the appendicular skeleton. The growth coefficients were, axial 1·13, forelimb 0·93 and hindlimb 0·92 (s.e. 0·025, 0013 and 0·015, respectively).The muscles of the proximal hindlimb were slightly heavier in the hind, and those of the dorsal neck and shoulder heavier in the stag.Only one minor anatomical variation was found which was related to the insertion of the m. rhomb oideus.

Growth of bovine tissues 2. Genetic influences on muscle growth and distribution in young bulls

1978 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. T. Berg ◽  
B. B. Andersen ◽  
T. Liboriussen
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Development ◽  
Muscle Growth ◽  
Young Male ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
The Body ◽  
Muscle Weight ◽  
Tissue Separation ◽  
Total Muscle

ABSTRACTMuscle weight distribution was compared by jointing and complete tissue separation of carcasses from 277 young male progeny of eight sire breeds and two dam breeds, serially slaughtered at 300 kg live weight, 12 months and 15 months of age. The sire breeds were Simmental, Charolais, Danish Red and White, Romagnola, Chianina. Hereford, Blonde d'Aquitaine and Limousin; the dam breeds were Danish Red and Danish Black Pied.Growth impetus for muscle in each joint was established from the allometric equation (Y = aXb). Growth coefficients, b, were homogenous among breeds, indicating similar muscle development patterns over the range of weights studied. Growth impetus waves increased centripetally on the limbs, caudocephalically on the whole of the body (being more marked dorsally) and dorsoventrally on the trunk.There were small but significant breed differences in the proportion of muscle in different joints at similar total muscle weight. They probably reflect differences in maturity and other minor functional influences. Chianina and Hereford crosses were the two extremes for muscle distribution with many of the remaining breed groups being very similar. Differences were already established by 300 kg live weight and muscle growth patterns were similar among breeds over the range of the experiment.

Bone weight distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses, and the prediction of carcass bone content from the bone content of joints

1977 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Kempster ◽  
A. Cuthbertson ◽  
D. W. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Weight Distribution ◽  
Allometric Equation ◽  
Feeding System ◽  
Prediction Equations ◽  
Breed Type ◽  
Limited Variation ◽  
Bone Content ◽  
Precise Prediction ◽  
Standard Deviations

SummaryDissection data for 753 steer carcasses from 17 breed-type × feeding system groups were used to examine the distribution of bone weight between 11 standardized commercial joints, and the prediction of bone content in side (half carcass) from the bone content of individual joints. Breed types included Ayrshire, Friesian, Friesian × Ayrshire and crosses out of Friesians by Angus, Charolais, Hereford, Limousin, Simmental and South Devon sires. Group means for bone weight in the side ranged from 14·9 to 21·0 kg with a pooled within-group S.D. of 1·97 kg.The increase in bone weight in each joint relative to that in the side was examined using the allometric equation. Pooled within-group growth coefficients (b values) were lowest for the leg (hind shin) and shin (fore shin) joints (b = 0·86 ± 0·02 and 0·94 ± 0·02 respectively) and highest for the sirloin (b = 1·10 ± 0·05).At equal total bone weight, there were significant (P < 0·001) but relatively small differences between groups in the weight of bone in each of the joints tested.Bone weights in the top piece, shin and coast joints gave the most precise prediction of bone weight in the side: the pooled within group residual standard deviations were 0·62, 0·67 and 0·71 kg respectively. The limited variation between groups in bone weight distribution was reflected in the robustness of common prediction equations across groups.

scholarly journals Production performance of cows raised with different post-weaning growth patterns

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey C Freetly ◽  
Robert A Cushman ◽  
Gary L Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Growth Pattern ◽  
Bos Taurus ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Production Performance ◽  
Genetic Population ◽  
Breed Type ◽  
Genetic Types ◽  
Period 2 ◽  
Step Growth

Abstract The period of heifer development is a relatively small fraction of a cow’s life; however, her pattern of growth may have permanent effects on her productivity as a cow. We hypothesized that altering the growth pattern during the peri-pubertal period would increase life-time productivity across genetic types of Bos taurus cows. The objective was to determine the stayability, calf production, and weight of calf weaned across six calf crops. Heifers (n = 685) were placed on one of two developmental programs at 256 ± 1 d of age. Control heifers received a diet that provided 228 kcal ME·(BW, kg) -0.75 daily, and Stair-Step heifers were allocated 157 kcal ME·(BW, kg) -0.75 daily for 84 or 85 d, and then the daily allocation was increased to 277 kcal ME·(BW, kg) -0.75. Stair-Step heifers (0.33 ± 0.02 kg/d) had a lower ADG than Control heifers (0.78 ± 0.02 kg/d; P &lt; 0.001) during Period 1, and Stair-Step heifers (0.93 ± 0.03 kg/d) had a greater ADG than Controls (0.70 ± 0.03 kg/d; P &lt; 0.001) during Period 2. There were no treatment (P = 0.28) or breed type differences (P = 0.42) for the proportion of cows weaning a calf; however, the proportion of cows weaning a calf decreased with cow age (P &lt; 0.001). Calves from Stair-Step dams had heavier weaning weights (193 ± 1 kg) compared to Control calves (191 ± 1 kg; P = 0.007). There was not a treatment (P = 0.25) or breed type differences in cumulative BW weaned (P = 0.59). A diverse genetic population of cattle within Bos taurus was tested and responses in calf production did not differ between Stair-Step growth pattern and a more constant non-obese growth pattern.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document