scholarly journals Basilic Vein Transposition Used as a Tertiary Vascular Access for Hemodialysis: 15 Years of Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. OJCS.S34837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Róbert Novotný ◽  
Marcela Slavíková ◽  
Jaroslav Hlubocký ◽  
Petr Mitáš ◽  
Jan Hrubý ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Patient Database ◽  
Arteriovenous Access

Introduction The quality of the life in patients requiring long term hemodialysis is directly proportional to the long-term patency of their vascular access. Basilic vein transposition for vascular access (BAVA) represents a suitable option for creating a tertiary native vascular access for hemodialysis on the upper extremities for patients requiring long term hemodialysis. The purpose of the study is to compare BAVAs with arteriovenous grafts (AVG). Method Data collection was based on selecting all of the patients with BAVA created in the time period in between January 1996 and August 2011. A questionnaire was created and sent to the selected hemodialysis centers. The resulting set of data was statistically analyzed and evaluated. Results In the time period between 1 January 1996 and August 2011, arteriovenous access for hemodialysis was created in 6754 patients (7203 procedures in total). Out of these patients, 175 BAVAs were created. Our patient database of those undergoing the BAVA procedure consisted of 98 females (56%) and 77 males (44%) with an average age of 64.5 years. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 60% (105 patients). Primary patency after 12 months was 68.8%, 24 months 59.7%, 36 months 53.8, 48 months 53.8%, and 60 months 50%. Primary assisted patency after 12 months was 89.9%, 24 months 84.6%, 36 months 77.8%, 48 months 77.9%, 60 months 70.8%. Secondary patency after 12 months was 89.4%, 24 months 86.9%, 36 months 81%, 48 months 78.9%, 60 months 75.7%. Twenty-nine BAVAs (16.5%) were obliterated. Conclusion Patients benefit from this type of procedure due to the longer patency of a native arteriovenous access, as well as a lower incidence of infectious complications.

Comparison Between Transposed Brachiobasilic Fistula and Arteriovenous Graft for Upper Limb Arteriovenous Access in Patients on Hemodialysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 153857442096925
Author(s):  
Chen-Ting Cheng ◽  
Yuan-Chen Chang ◽  
Ka-Wai Tam ◽  
Yu-Chun Yen ◽  
Yu-Chen Ko
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Arteriovenous Graft ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Arteriovenous Access ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

Background: Creating and maintaining a functioning arteriovenous access is essential for long-term hemodialysis patients. Transposed brachiobasilic fistula (BBF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) becomes an option when radiocephalic or brachiocephalic fistula cannot be created or fails. This study compared the patency and complications between BBFs and AVGs among patients on hemodialysis. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in Shuang Ho Hospital, Taiwan, from November 2015 to May 2020. All the operations were done by a single surgeon. Primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency of the BBF and AVG groups. Secondary outcomes were incidence of complications and reinterventions. Results: Of the 144 consecutive patients, 20 and 124 patients underwent BBF and AVG creation, respectively. Median follow-up time was 19.2 months. Primary patency at 1 and 2 years were 67% and 19% in the BBF group and 44% and 16% in the AVG group (P = 0.126). Primary-assisted patency at 1 and 2 years were 82% and 54% in the BBF group and 54% and 30% in the AVG group (P = 0.012). Secondary patency at 1 and 2 years were 100% and 82% in the BBF group and 81% and 67% in the AVG group (P = 0.078). The incidence of complication was significantly higher in the AVG than in the BBF group (1.7 per patient-year vs 0.93, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Compared with the AVG group, BBF group showed better primary-assisted patency, less complication and intervention rates. Therefore, BBF is a reliable option for patients with exhausted cephalic veins if basilic vein is available for reconstruction.

scholarly journals Two-stage forearm brachio-basilic loop arteriovenous graft for hemodialysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 316-319
Author(s):  
Branislav Donfrid ◽  
Olivera Lozance ◽  
Zvezdan Stefanovic ◽  
Aleksandar Jankovic ◽  
Nada Dimkovic
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Duplex Sonography ◽  
Distal Region ◽  
Original Method ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein

Introduction. The autologous radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the best vascular access for patients on chronic hemodialysis. In some patients with inadequate blood vessels, it is necessary to create proximal AVF, or arteriovenous grafts. High percentage of primary graft failure is noted in cases where diameters of the brachial artery and the basilic vein are insufficient. The aim of this work was to introduce a new surgical technique for arteriovenous creation in patients with inadequate blood diameter. Case outline. The authors have proposed implantation of brachio-basilic polytetrafluoroethylene AV forearm loop graft in two acts. In the first act, the native brachio-basilic AVF was created in the distal region of the arm by side-to-end anastomosis. Three to four weeks after the first act, significant dilatation of brachial artery and basilic vein was noted (confirmed by the use of color duplex sonography technique). During the second act, polytetrafluourethylene graft was implanted by end-to-end anastomosis on the dilated basilica vein. Conclusion. AV graft that was created in two acts has sufficient blood flow without early or late complications. Primary patency was 30 months and secondary patency was 50 months. As an original method in the current literature, we recommend it in different clinical settings when there are no better alternatives for vascular access.

MILLER Banding Procedure for Treatment of Dialysis Access–Related Steal Syndrome, Pulmonary Hypertension, and Heart Failure

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110562
Author(s):  
Ahmad Alqassieh ◽  
Patrick B. Dennis ◽  
Veena Mehta ◽  
June Shi ◽  
Angello Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Steal Syndrome

A Minimally Invasive Limited Ligation Endoluminal-assisted Revision (MILLER) banding procedure has been used for treating patients with dialysis access–related steal syndrome (DASS) and high-flow vascular access–related pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and heart failure (HF). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the MILLER procedure performed for DASS, HF, and PHT from our Vascular Access Database from September 2017 to October 2019. Outcomes included primary patency of banding, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency, using time-to-event analyses with Kaplan-Meier curves and life tables to estimate 6- and 12-month rates. A total of 13 patients (6 men and 7 women, mean age 60 ± 14 years) underwent the MILLER procedure, 6 patients for DASS and 7 patients for pulmonary hypertension and heart failure (PHT/HF). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The longest duration of follow-up was 28 months (median 12 months [IQR 7, 19]). One patient died at 1 month after the intervention due to stroke. One patient developed access thrombosis of the graft 3 days after the procedure. Repeat banding was required in 1 patient 8 months after the first procedure. The 6-month primary patency rate of banding following this procedure was 83% while the 12-month rate was 66%. The 6- and 12-month secondary patency rates were 87% and 75%, respectively. The MILLER procedure can be performed for DASS and PHT/HF with improvement of symptoms and good long-term patency rates. Additional interventions to maintain patency and efficacy are required on long-term follow-up.

P1339ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA AND BASILIC VEIN TRANSPOSITION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS ON HEMODIALYSIS: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinant Bhargava ◽  
Priti Meena ◽  
Ambrish Satwik ◽  
Apurv Srivastava ◽  
A K Bhalla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background and Aims With the increase in the line expectancy of chronic kidney disease in the older population (&gt;60 years), the numbers requiring haemodialysis is progressively rising. The elderly population may be different from the younger in terms of non-suitable vessels for access creation, non-maturation, and vascular calcifications, and this may alter the outcomes of use of arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This study was conducted to analyse the outcomes of AVF in elderly patients (&gt;60 years). Method Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Nephrology at Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi. Patients of more than 60 years of age in whom AVF was created from 1st January 2012 to 31st December 2016 were included in the study. Follow-up data of 3.5 years was analysed. The primary endpoint was to assess primary and secondary patency rates. Results A total of 300 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 63.8 years. Radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) was the most common site of [69.8% (n = 210)], followed by brachiocephalic (BCAVF) in 25.2% (n = 75) and basilic vein transposition (BVT) in 5% (n = 15). At 12 months, overall survival of the AVF was 66.8%. At 42 months, the primary patency rate of RCAVF, BCAVF, and BVT was 50.6%, 52.6%, and 50.4% respectively. The commonest cause of access failure was thrombosis (20.4%) followed by non-maturation (9%). Vascular access abandonment was found least in BCAVF. Conclusion AVF remains the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis in the elderly population. Brachiocephalic AVF has higher primary and secondary patency rates. Thrombosis and failure of maturation are major concerns in the elderly AVF.

Long-Term Outcomes of Staged Basilic Vein Transposition for Hemodialysis Access in Children

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 366-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Kfoury ◽  
Christopher J. Demaree ◽  
Mun J. Poi ◽  
Jesus M. Matos ◽  
Carlos F. Bechara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Hemodialysis Access ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Av Fistula ◽  
Functional Maturation

Introduction Children requiring long-term hemodialysis often face significant challenges due to their young age and small-vessel caliber for arteriovenous (AV) access creation. In this study, we report our experience of staged basilic vein transposition (BVT) in pediatric patients. Methods All patients undergoing staged BVT at a tertiary care pediatric hospital from 2003 to 2015 were reviewed. Indications for staged BVT included inadequate cephalic conduit or failed AV fistula using cephalic vein. Pertinent clinical variables were analyzed to determine treatment outcomes. Results Forty-two children (24 males, 57%) underwent 46 staged BVT during the study period. Median age was 12.8 ± 4.8 years (range 3-18). The mean weight was 47 ± 5.1 kg (range, 13-126 kg), with four children (10%) weighing ≤20 kg. Mean operative times for initial brachiobasilic AV fistula and staged BVT were 39 ± 12 minutes and 66 ± 17 minutes, respectively. Mean follow-up period was 5.4 ± 1.8 years. Functional maturation was achieved in 93% of BVTs. Early fistula thrombosis within 30 days following BVT occurred in four patients (10%). Late BVT thrombosis occurred in 13 patients (31%). Primary patency rates at 2 years and 4 years were 78% and 72%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 2 years and 4 years were 86% and 82%, respectively. Conclusions Staged BVT is a durable and reliable autologous hemodialysis access in children who do not have adequate cephalic venous conduit.

Long-term patency rate of the translocated autologous saphenous vein versus prosthetic material in vascular access surgery for haemodialysis and parenteral nutrition

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110131
Author(s):  
Wouter Driessen ◽  
Wilbert van der Meijden ◽  
Geert Wanten ◽  
Frank van Hoek
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Patency Rate ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Prosthetic Material ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate the long-term patency rate of the arteriovenous angioaccess (AVA) with interposition of either autologous or prosthetic material as a last option for vascular access in the upper extremity. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review study of all patients who received an AVA with autologous saphenous vein (SV Group, n = 38) or prosthetic material (PTFE Group, n = 25) as a conduit from the year 1996 to 2020 in the Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc). Data were retrospectively extracted from two prospectively updated local databases for vascular access, one for haemodialysis (HD) and one for parenteral nutrition (PN). When required, the medical records of each patient were used. Data were eventually collected anonymously and analysed in SPSS 25. Kaplan-Meier life-tables were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Primary patency at 12 and 48 months was 30% and 20% in the SV group and 45% and 14% in the PTFE group. No significant difference was shown in the median primary patency rate ( p = 0.715). Secondary patency at 12 and 48 months was 63% and 39% in the SV group and 55% and 19% in the PTFE group. This was considered a significant difference in median secondary patency in favour of the SV with 41.16 ± 17.67 months against 13.77 ± 10.22 months for PTFE ( p = 0.032). The incidence of infection was significantly lower in the SV group ( p = 0.0002). A Kaplan-Meier curve could not detect a significant difference in secondary patency between the access for haemodialysis and the access for parenteral nutrition. The secondary patency of the SV in parenteral nutrition access, was significantly higher when compared with PTFE ( p = 0.004). Conclusion: The SV can be preferred over PTFE when conduit material is needed for long-term vascular access for HD or PN treatment due to its higher secondary patency and lower infection risk.

scholarly journals Long-term results of open aorto-femoral reconstructions

2021 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
T. B. Rakhmatillaev ◽  
A. V. Gusinskiy ◽  
V. V. Shlomin ◽  
O. V. Fionik ◽  
A. V. Shatravka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Supervision ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Femoral Arteries ◽  
Reconstructive Operations

The objective was to analyze the long-term results of open aorto-femoral reconstructions in order to optimize the approach to surgical treatment.Methods and materials. The study included 548 patients with reconstructions of the aorto-femoral segment performed between 1999 and 2007. Of these, 293 patients underwent loop endarterectomy of the iliac arteries, 255 – after aorto-femoral bypass with a synthetic prosthesis. All interventions were performed against the critical lower limb ischemia. The superficial femoral arteries remained occluded in all cases. Outflow was carried out only in the deep femoral arteries and collateral vessels. Patients were under clinical supervision for 5 to 20 years. In the long-term period, most patients underwent interventions on the coronary, brachiocephalic arteries, as well as surgery for cancer.Results. Timely correction of concomitant pathology made it possible to increase the survival rate of patients by the 10-year follow-up period to 72 %, and after 20 years this figure reached 63 %. The primary patency of the reconstructed segment after loop endarterectomy was significantly higher than after aorto-femoral bypass surgery. Secondary patency in the groups did not significantly differ and by 20 years of follow-up reached 76 %. A high level of patency of the operated segment was also provided by a large percentage of preserved limbs (80 % after 20 years). A study of the quality of life showed that, despite the persistence of intermittent claudication at the level of 400–800 meters, the vast majority of patients were satisfied with their life. Suppurations in the transplant area and the formation of false aneurysms in the area of anastomoses were found only in the group of aorto-femoral bypass grafts.Conclusion. Open reconstructive operations on the aorto-femoral segment, such as loop endarterectomy and aorto-femoral bypass with adequate postoperative medical examination have good long-term results of survival, patency of the reconstructed segment, percentage of saved limbs and quality of life of patients. Complications in the form of suppuration in the transplant area and the formation of false aneurysms occur only after bypass.

The forearm basilic vein looped transposition fistula as a tertiary option for upper limb vascular access

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 596-601
Author(s):  
Maciej Zielinski ◽  
Nicholas Inston ◽  
Zbigniew Krasinski ◽  
Marcin Gabriel ◽  
Grzegorz Oszkinis
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
False Aneurysm ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Arterial Diameter ◽  
Male Predominance ◽  
Peripheral Arterial

Introduction: The forearm basilic vein can serve as an option for haemodialysis access but may not be possible in cases where the wrist arteries are unsuitable. In this setting, the forearm basilic vein can be used in a looped transposition with a brachial artery anastomosis. Aims: The aims of this study were to assess the outcome of forearm basilic vein looped transposition as an option for vascular access. Material and methods: Data from January 2007 to December 2010 were prospectively collected and analysed. Outcome measures were operative success, complications, maturation and primary and secondary patency following 5 years of follow-up. Results: From a total of 583 patients receiving autologous vascular access for haemodialysis, 24 (4.1%) underwent a forearm basilic vein looped transposition. The median age was 60 years (range, 27–80 years), with a slight male predominance (13 male:11 female). Mean follow-up was 34 months (1–60 months). Two patients died and other three were transplanted with subsequent fistula closure. All procedures were successful (100%); however, maturation failure occurred in one case (4.2%). No serious perioperative complications were observed. In two cases, we observed late false aneurysm formation requiring intervention. Primary patency at 1, 2, 3 and 5 years was the following: 77%, 62%, 21% and 10%, whereas secondary patency was the following: 81%, 71%, 61% and 32%, respectively. Conclusion: Autologous forearm basilic vein looped transposition is an effective surgical procedure for the creation of access for haemodialysis. This may be a useful option in patients with compromised peripheral arterial diameter or flow and should be considered in patients with a suitable forearm basilic vein.

Long-term outcomes of basilic vein transposition fistula for hemodialysis

VASA ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilmaz ◽  
Senkaya ◽  
Saba ◽  
Bicer
Keyword(s):  
Vascular Access ◽  
Prosthetic Graft ◽  
Primary Patency ◽  
Dialysis Access ◽  
Superficial Vein ◽  
Basilic Vein ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Maturation Rate

Background: There has been a dramatic increase in both the availability of hemodialysis and long-term survival of patients with chronic renal failure. Patients who require long-term hemodialysis need long-term vascular access. The transposed autologous basilic vein to brachial artery arteriovenous fistula provides vascular access in the absence of adequate superficial vein. Patients and methods: We follow an aggressive "all-autogenous" policy with regard to dialysis access and recommend prosthetic graft when autogenous options are exhausted. A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients who underwent basilic vein transposition for hemodialysis access between January 2000 and March 2004. Mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 4 to 32 months). Results: A retrospective review of 42 patients undergoing basilic vein transposition was performed. 18 of the patients were men and 24 patients were women. The mean age was 34.6 ± 12.9 (mean ± SD) years. Most of the patients were already receiving hemodialysis (92%), with a mean of 2.2 (range, 1 to 4) previous access attempts. Maturation rate was 85.7%. Primary patency rates were 71.4%, 54.7% and secondary (overall) patency rates were 88.0%, 64.2% at the end of the first and second years, respectively. Complications developed in 23 (54.7%) cases, and included arm edema, thrombosis, hematoma, infection, steal syndrome, poor flow and aneurysm formation. Conclusion: Transposed brachial-basilic fistula have a good long-term patency rate and should be considered early, before prosthetic grafting, in the absence of a suitable superficial vein.

Forearm brachial artery to brachial vein looped arteriovenous grafts: A single center, single surgeon observational study

2021 ◽  
pp. 112972982110150
Author(s):  
Jeremy Liu ◽  
Josiah Situmeang ◽  
Devin Takahashi ◽  
Russell Harada
Keyword(s):  
Primary Patency ◽  
The Body ◽  
Secondary Patency ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Arteriovenous Graft ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Brachial Vein ◽  
Arteriovenous Grafts

Background: Long-term hemodialysis (HD) treatment requires the establishment of a cannulatable vascular access (VA) point. While the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is considered the gold standard, the arteriovenous graft (AVG) is a viable alternative especially in patients with poor superficial venous anatomy. Few studies have assessed the efficacy of the brachial-brachial arteriovenous graft (BB-AVG) for long-term HD access. By analyzing one surgeon’s experience in creating, surveilling and maintaining BB-AVGs, this retrospective study aims to add to the body of literature in assessing patency outcomes of BB-AVGs. Methods: We identified 57 BB-AVGs that met inclusion criteria and were created between October 6, 2005 and May 1, 2019 by a single surgeon in 54 patients. We analyzed primary failures, patency, complications and interventions. Patency rates were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The incidence of complications and interventions were expressed as number of events per person-year. Results: A total of 54 patients (median age of 65 years) were analyzed. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 20.4% 7.4%, and 5.0%. Primary assisted patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 46.7%, 33.5%, and 15.1%. The secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 81.8%, 63.8%, and 60.1%, respectively. The incidence of complications and interventions was 2.164 per person-year. Most complications and interventions were due to stenosis (1.202 per person-year) or thrombosis (0.802 per person-year). Conclusion: In patients with poor superficial veins, the brachial vein is a reasonable alternative to use as the venous outflow. However, in order to achieve acceptable patency rates, close monitoring of the VA, as well as aggressive treatment of complications within the brachial vein is necessary. Overall, the BB-AVG should be considered in patients who lack adequate superficial veins and require preservation of the more proximal veins.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document