scholarly journals Urinary Excretion of Phenolic Acids by Infants and Children: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Assay

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. CMPed.S9349
Author(s):  
J. Uberos ◽  
V. Fernéndez-Puentes ◽  
M. Molina-Oya ◽  
R. Rodrïguez-Belmonte ◽  
A. Ruïz-López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Excretion ◽  
Ferulic Acid ◽  
Phenolic Acids ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Assay ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Study Population

Objectives The present study, which is part of the ISRCTN16968287 clinical assay, is aimed at determining the effects of cranberry syrup or trimethoprim treatment for UTI. Methods This Phase III randomised clinical trial was conducted at the San Cecilio Clinical Hospital (Granada, Spain) with a study population of 192 patients, aged between 1 month and 13 years. Criteria for inclusion were a background of recurrent UTI, associated or otherwise with vesico-ureteral reflux of any degree, or renal pelvic dilatation associated with urinary infection. Each child was randomly given 0.2 mL/Kg/day of either cranberry syrup or trimethoprim (8 mg/mL). The primary and secondary objectives, respectively, were to determine the risk of UTI and the levels of phenolic acids in urine associated with each intervention. Results With respect to UTI, the cranberry treatment was non-inferior to trimethoprim. Increased urinary excretion of ferulic acid was associated with a greater risk of UTI developing in infants aged under 1 year (RR 1.06; CI 95% 1.024–1.1; P = 0.001). Conclusions The results obtained show the excretion of ferulic acid is higher in infants aged under 1 year, giving rise to an increased risk of UTI, for both treatment options.

scholarly journals National Cancer Institute of Canada – Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG)

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 373-401
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Primary Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Tamoxifen ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Increased Risk

This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by National Cancer Institute of Canada – Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG). Clinical trials include: Double-blind randomized trial of tamoxifen versus placebo in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative (tumor ≥ 1 cm and either higher histological grade (poorly differentiated, or SBR grade III or MSBR grade V) or lymphatic/vascular invasion or both) breast cancer who have completed CMF, CEF or AC adjuvant chemotherapy. NCIC CTG Trial MA.12A randomized trial of antiestrogen therapy versus combined antiestrogen and octreotide LAR therapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. NCIC CTG Trial MA.14A phase III randomized double blind study of letrozole versus placebo in women with primary breast cancer completing five or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen. BIG 01-97/NCIC CTG MA.17NCIC CTG MA.17 Companion study (2): The influence of letrozole on bone mineral density in women with primary breast cancer completing five or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen. BIG 01-97/NCIC MA.17BNCIC CTG MA.17 Companion study (1): The influence of letrozole on serum lipid concentrations in women with primary breast cancer who have completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. BIG 01-97/NCIC CTG MA.17LNCIC CTG MA.17R A double blind re-randomization to letrozole or placebo for women completing 5 years of adjuvant letrozole in the MA.17 study.A phase III study of regional radiation therapy in early breast cancer. NCIC CTG trial MA.20A phase III adjuvant trial of sequenced EC + GCSF Taxol versus sequenced AC → Taxol versus CEF as therapy for premenopausal women and early postmenopausal women who have had potentially curative surgery for node positive or high-risk node negative breast cancer. NCIC CTG Trial MA.21A phase I/II study of increasing doses of epirubicin and docetaxel + pegfilgrastim for locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. NCIC CTG Trial MA.22A randomized phase III trial of exemestane versus anastrozole with or without celecoxib in postmenopausal women with receptor positive primary breast cancer. NCIC CTG Trial MA.27A randomized feasibility study of letrozole in postmenopausal women at increased risk for development of breast cancer as evidenced by high breast density. NCIC CTG Trial MAP.1A randomized study of the effect of exemestane (Aromasin) versus placebo on breast density in postmenopausal women at increased risk for development of breast cancer. NCIC CTG Trial: MAP.2A phase III randomized study of exemestane versus placebo in postmenopausal women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. NCIC CTG Trial: MAP.3

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with diabetes: Results from the phase III TARGET study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16099-e16099
Author(s):  
S. Oudard ◽  
T. Eisen ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
M. Siebels ◽  
S. Negrier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Formal Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Diabetes Status ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc

e16099 Background: Results of the phase III TARGET trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sorafenib (SOR) treatment in pts with clear-cell RCC in whom 1 prior systemic therapy had failed, indicated that SOR is effective and safe for pts with advanced RCC, leading to the approval of SOR for the treatment of advanced RCC. Diabetes can be associated with increased morbidity during treatment in a variety of malignancies. Therefore, an exploratory subset analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOR in pts enrolled in TARGET with or without diabetes at baseline. Methods: Pts (N=903) with advanced clear-cell RCC, ECOG PS 0–2, and low- or intermediate-risk MSKCC score were randomized 1:1 to SOR 400 mg BID or placebo (PBO). End points included OS, PFS, and safety. A planned independently-assessed formal analysis of PFS showed significant benefit for SOR over PBO; consequently, pts assigned to PBO were able to cross over to SOR. Results: Pt demographics were similar for all subsets. Pre- crossover data by subset are shown in the table . The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) across subgroups was consistent with that for the overall population. In pts with vs without diabetes, treatment with SOR was not associated with increased hyperglycemia (1 pt/arm in the without diabetes subgroups only) or hypertension. Conclusions: The safety profile of SOR in pts with diabetes was comparable with that for the overall study population. SOR was well tolerated and AEs were manageable. Trends in improved PFS were observed for SOR regardless of baseline diabetes status; however, the small diabetic subset limits interpretation of a SOR OS benefit in this subpopulation. *Final PFS of overall study population based on independent review from Jan 2005; all other data from May 2005 database [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (33) ◽  
pp. 3858-3865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Jue Bang ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Keun-Wook Lee ◽  
Jae Yong Cho ◽  
Eun-Kee Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gastric Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Atm Protein

Purpose Gastric cancer cell lines, particularly those with low levels of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), a key activator of DNA damage response, are sensitive to the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We compared the efficacy of olaparib plus paclitaxel (olaparib/paclitaxel) with paclitaxel alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer and assessed whether low ATM expression is predictive of improved clinical outcome for olaparib/paclitaxel. Patients and Methods In this phase II, double-blind study (Study 39; NCT01063517), patients were randomly assigned to oral olaparib 100 mg twice per day (tablets) plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 per day intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle) or placebo plus paclitaxel (placebo/paclitaxel), followed by maintenance monotherapy with olaparib (200 mg twice per day) or placebo. The study population was enriched to 50% for patients with low or undetectable ATM levels (ATMlow). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results One hundred twenty-three of 124 randomly assigned patients received treatment (olaparib/paclitaxel, n = 61; placebo/paclitaxel, n = 62). The screening prevalence of ATMlow patients was 14%. Olaparib/paclitaxel did not lead to a significant improvement in PFS versus placebo/paclitaxel (overall population: hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; median PFS, 3.91 v 3.55 months, respectively; ATMlow population: HR, 0.74; median PFS, 5.29 v 3.68 months, respectively). However, olaparib/paclitaxel significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo/paclitaxel in both the overall population (HR, 0.56; 80% CI, 0.41 to 0.75; P = .005; median OS, 13.1 v 8.3 months, respectively) and the ATMlow population (HR, 0.35; 80% CI, 0.22 to 0.56; P = .002; median OS, not reached v 8.2 months, respectively). Olaparib/paclitaxel was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety findings. Conclusion Olaparib/paclitaxel is active in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, with a greater OS benefit in ATMlow patients. A phase III trial in this setting is under way.

Improved survival outcomes in clinically relevant patient subgroups from COU-AA-301, a phase III study of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone (P) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. I. Scher ◽  
C. Logothetis ◽  
A. Molina ◽  
O. B. Goodman ◽  
C. N. Sternberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Patient Subgroups

4 Background: AA is a selective androgen biosynthesis inhibitor that blocks the action of CYP17. Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that AA potently inhibits persistent androgen synthesis from adrenal and intratumoral sources, thus suppressing an important growth stimulus for mCRPC. Methods: COU-AA-301 ( NCT00638690 ) is an international, randomized, double blind study of AA (1,000 mg + P 5 mg po BID) vs placebo + P administered to men with mCRPC progressing after docetaxel-based chemo. OS is the primary endpoint. Patients treated with previous ketoconazole or > 2 prior chemo regimens were excluded. Results: Data are drawn from a planned, stratified interim analysis, unblinded in August 2010, based on significant OS improvement in the AA + P treatment group compared to the placebo + P group [median OS 14.8 vs.10.9 months; HR = 0.646 (0.54-0.77), P < 0.0001]. A subgroup analysis for OS is presented in the table. Mineralocorticoid- related AEs were more common in the AA arm vs placebo: fluid retention 30.5% vs 22.3%, hypokalemia 17.1% vs 8.4%; but grade 3/4 hypokalemia (3.8% vs 0.8%), and grade 3/4 hypertension (1.3% vs 0.3%) were infrequent. LFT abnormalities were observed in 10.4% AA vs 8.1% placebo; and cardiac disorders were observed in 13.3% AA vs 10.4% placebo. Conclusions: AA significantly prolongs OS in patients with mCRPC who have progressed after docetaxel-based chemo. AA's favorable treatment effect on OS, observed across multiple patient subgroups (HR range 0.59 – 0.74 vs placebo + P), was consistent with the survival benefit for the overall study population. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Meta-analysis of anti-VEGF class adverse events from three double-blind (db), placebo (pbo)-controlled phase III trials with IV aflibercept (Afl).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3579-3579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Carmen Joseph Allegra ◽  
Philippe R Rougier ◽  
Giorgio Scagliotti ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

3579 Background: Three db, pbo-controlled studies were conducted with IV Afl in metastatic cancer patients (pts) (colorectal [CRC], Afl + FOLFIRI [WCGC 2011, abstract O-0024]; lung [LC], Afl + docetaxel [WCLC 2011, abstract 511]; and pancreatic [PC], Afl + gemcitabine [WCGC 2009 abstract O-0006]). Each study used the same weekly Afl dose intensity (4 mg/kg q2w for CRC and PC; 6 mg/kg q3w for LC). A safety meta-analysis of anti-VEGF class adverse events (AEs) was performed on data from these studies. Methods: A fixed-effect logistic regression model was used, including study, treatment, and study-by-treatment interaction factors as covariates to test the consistency of treatment effect across studies for each of the considered AE. When no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effects was found across studies, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Summary incidences (% of pts) and RR are presented for NCI grade 3-4 events. Results: Safety data from a total of 2662 pts (Afl, 1333; pbo, 1329) were included for analysis. Among pts treated with Afl, 0.4 and 0.5% experienced grade 4 hypertension and nephrotic syndrome, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of Afl to concurrent chemotherapies did not increase the risk of VTE. The risk of grade 3-4 anti-VEGF class AEs was increased when adding Afl to concurrent chemotherapies. This increased risk was statistically significant only for hypertension, proteinuria, and hemorrhage. Further analyses, when more data are available, should improve the precision of these results. [Table: see text]

Everolimus for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: Updated results of the BOLERO-2 phase III trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 559-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart ◽  
Shinzaburo Noguchi ◽  
Kathleen I. Pritchard ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Aromatase Inhibitor ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily

559 Background: Current treatment options for postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) who relapse or progress on a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) are limited. The BOLERO-2 trial supports the activity of everolimus (EVE; an oral mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitor) added to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane (EXE) to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in this patient population. Long-term PFS and survival data are awaited. Methods: BOLERO-2 is a phase III double-blind, randomized, international trial comparing EVE (10 mg once daily) plus EXE (25 mg once daily) versus placebo (PBO) plus EXE in postmenopausal women with advanced ER+ BC progressing or recurring after NSAIs (letrozole or anastrozole). Patients were randomized (2:1) to EVE + EXE or PBO + EXE. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator assessment. Main secondary endpoints included centrally assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, bone turnover, and overall response rate (ORR). Results: Baseline disease characteristics including tumor burden and prior cancer therapy were well balanced between treatment arms (N = 724). Median PFS was doubled and response rates were consistently improved with EVE + EXE (n = 485) vs PBO + EXE (n = 239) in interim analyses. Median PFS by local assessment was ~3 mo with PBO + EXE vs 6.9 mo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; P < .0001) and 7.4 mo (HR = 0.44; P < .0001) with EVE + EXE at 7.5 mo and 12.5 mo follow-up, respectively. Fewer deaths were reported with EVE + EXE (17.2%) vs PBO + EXE (22.7%) at 12.5 mo follow-up. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports for mTOR inhibitors. PFS data including 528 events (protocol-specified final analysis), and updated OS and safety data will be presented. Conclusions: Adding EVE to EXE markedly prolonged PFS in patients with NSAI-refractory advanced ER+ BC. There were fewer deaths among patients receiving EVE, and further follow-up will evaluate the effect of EVE on OS.

scholarly journals Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-219214
Author(s):  
Bernard Combe ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
J Abraham Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Randomised Clinical Trial ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Double Blind

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase-1-preferential inhibitor filgotinib versus placebo or tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsThis 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled phase III trial evaluated once-daily oral filgotinib in patients with RA randomised 3:3:2:3 to filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) or filgotinib 100 mg (FIL100), subcutaneous adalimumab 40 mg biweekly, or placebo (through week 24), all with stable weekly background MTX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12. Additional efficacy outcomes were assessed sequentially. Safety was assessed from adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.ResultsThe proportion of patients (n=1755 randomised and treated) achieving ACR20 at week 12 was significantly higher for FIL200 (76.6%) and FIL100 (69.8%) versus placebo (49.9%; treatment difference (95% CI), 26.7% (20.6% to 32.8%) and 19.9% (13.6% to 26.2%), respectively; both p<0.001). Filgotinib was superior to placebo in key secondary endpoints assessing RA signs and symptoms, physical function and structural damage. FIL200 was non-inferior to adalimumab in terms of Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C reactive protein ≤3.2 at week 12 (p<0.001); FIL100 did not achieve non-inferiority. Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were comparable among active treatment arms.ConclusionsFilgotinib improved RA signs and symptoms, improved physical function, inhibited radiographic progression and was well tolerated in patients with RA with inadequate response to MTX. FIL200 was non-inferior to adalimumab.Trial registration numberNCT02889796.

scholarly journals KEYNOTE-921: Phase III study of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P Petrylak ◽  
Raffaele Ratta ◽  
Rustem Gafanov ◽  
Gaetano Facchini ◽  
Josep M Piulats ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Previously Treated

Despite recent advances, treatment options for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after next-generation hormonal agents (NHAs) are limited and provide only modest survival benefit. Thus, an unmet need remains for mCRPC patients after treatment with targeted endocrine therapy or NHA therapy. Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody for PD-1, has been found to have activity as monotherapy in patients with mCRPC and as combination therapy in a Phase Ib/II study with docetaxel and prednisone/prednisolone for patients previously treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone acetate. The aim of the randomized, double-blind, Phase III KEYNOTE-921 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus docetaxel in patients with mCRPC who were previously treated with an NHA. Clinical trial registration: NCT03834506 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

scholarly journals The State of Neuro-Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Worldwide Assessment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej M Mrugala ◽  
Quinn T Ostrom ◽  
Shelley M Pressley ◽  
Jennie Taylor ◽  
Alissa A Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Technology Use ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Personal Safety ◽  
Investigational Treatment ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Training And Research ◽  
Personal Challenges

Abstract Background It remains unknown how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed neuro-oncology clinical practice, training and research efforts. Methods: We performed an international survey of practitioners, scientists, and trainees from 21 neuro-oncology organizations across 6 continents, April 24–May 17, 2020. We assessed clinical practice and research environments; institutional preparedness and support; and perceived impact on patients. Results Of 582 respondents, 258 (45%) were US-based, and 314 (55%) international. 94% participants reported changes in their clinical practice. 95% respondents converted at least some practice to telemedicine. 10% practitioners felt the need to see patients in person, specifically because of billing concerns and pressure from their institutions. 67% practitioners suspended enrollment for at least one clinical trial, including 62% suspending phase III trial enrollments. Over 50% believed neuro-oncology patients were at increased risk for COVID-19. 71% clinicians feared for their own personal safety or that of their families, specifically because of their clinical duties; 20% had inadequate PPE. While 69% reported increased stress, 44% received no psychosocial support from their institutions. 37% had salary reductions and 63% researchers temporarily closed their laboratories. However, the pandemic created positive changes in perceived patient satisfaction, communication quality, and technology use to deliver care and mediate interactions with other practitioners. Conclusions The pandemic has changed treatment schedules and limited investigational treatment options. Institutional lack of support created clinician and researcher anxiety. Communication with patients was satisfactory. We make recommendations to guide clinical and scientific infrastructure moving forward, and address the personal challenges of providers and researchers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document