Efficient, Cost Effective Waste Site Characterization Utilizing Complementary Non‐Intrusive Geophysical Techniques: A Case Study of 2‐D and 3‐D Ground Penetrating Radar and Magnetometer Surveys

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Sims ◽  
G. G. Rucker ◽  
R. A. Plunkett ◽  
K. M. Wise ◽  
H. M. Hickey
Plant Methods ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Delgado ◽  
Dirk B. Hays ◽  
Richard K. Bruton ◽  
Hernán Ceballos ◽  
Alexandre Novo ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosemary Knight ◽  
James Irving ◽  
Eugene Freeman ◽  
Paulette Tercier

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-459
Author(s):  
Nectaria Diamanti ◽  
A. Peter Annan

We provide a coherent approach for developing an understanding of how and where ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can be deployed for tunnel detection. While tunnels in general are of interest, the more specific focus is tunnels that are hand dug or created with a minimal amount of equipment and resources for clandestine purposes. Determining whether GPR can be used for tunnel detection is impossible without an in-depth knowledge of the operational environment and constraints. To effectively address the question, we define the general characteristics of clandestine tunnels, discuss how to estimate the responses amplitude, define the dominant noise types associated with GPR data, and point out how those factors are affected by the GPR system. The key aspects are illustrated using a controlled field case study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document