Transition of a Misch removable prosthesis-5 to a fixed prosthesis-3: From a removable to a fixed complete denture

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 144
Author(s):  
Anup Gopi
Keyword(s):  
Complete Denture ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

scholarly journals Jenis-jenis gigitiruan dukungan implan Implant-supported dentures

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Poedji Rahajoeningsih ◽  
Rosida Manurung
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Bone Implant ◽  
Tooth Roots ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Implant System

Dental implants, or completely said as dental implant bodies, function as analogues of tooth roots, achieving aunion directly with jawbone following their insertion into a prepared socket in the bone. Implant system have threebasic components, namely the dental implant body that is lying in the jawbone, abutment that lies on the jawboneand the prosthesis. Dental implants may stabilize a removable prosthesis, complete or partial overdentures, and orsupport and stabilize a fixed prosthesis. In designing implant-supported removable prostheses, there are three formsof anchorage frequently used, namely bar/sleeve (clip) joints which links two or more implants, ball/cap anchoragesapplied individually to two or more isolated implants, and magnets/magnetic keepers. Implant-supported fixedprosthesis is either screwed to or cemented on to the abutment.

scholarly journals Techniques for Evaluating the Fit of Removable and Fixed Prosthesis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mallika S. Shetty ◽  
K. Kamalakanth Shenoy
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Methods ◽  
Surrounding Tissue ◽  
Clinical Methods ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

The importance of an accurately fitting fixed prosthesis or a removable prosthesis is essential for the success of the restoration. Ill-fitting prosthesis may cause mechanical failures of the prosthesis, implant systems, or biologic complications of the surrounding tissue. There are several causes related to improper seating of the prosthesis. Some of which can be corrected and the others need to be repeated. Hence the clinician must carefully evaluate the adaptation of the prosthesis using the clinical techniques and combination of the available materials and evaluation methods to optimize the fit of prosthesis. This article reviews the various clinical methods that have been suggested for evaluating the fit of the fixed and removable prosthesis.

Hidden Overdenture Bar in Fixed Implant-retained Hybrid Prosthesis: Report of a Novel Technique

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 780-782
Author(s):  
Prajna P Shetty ◽  
Makam Gangaiah
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Comprehensive Treatment ◽  
Patient Needs ◽  
Clinical Consideration ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Novel Technique ◽  
Implant Abutments ◽  
Hybrid Prosthesis ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

ABSTRACT Introduction Every patient needs a comprehensive treatment planning. Dentists must consider the advantages and disadvantages of the available implant prosthetic options and match them to patient's expectations. Hybrid denture prosthesis is one, i.e., fabricated and retained by screw threaded into implant abutments, most of the time on four implants. Sometimes due to failure of an implant, the prosthesis needs to be replaced with a newer casting to accommodate the existing implants. Clinical consideration This article presents a novel technique, wherein the existing framework of the fixed prosthesis can be used to convert the fixed prosthesis to removable prosthesis on the existing implants, without recasting. Clinical significance The implant is economical and easily convertible from a fixed-fixed to a fixed-removable prosthesis. Hence, there is reduced morbidity, reduced cost, and an increased psychological comfort for the patient. How to cite this article Shetty PP, Gangaiah M, Chowdhary R. Hidden Overdenture Bar in Fixed Implant-retained Hybrid Prosthesis: Report of a Novel Technique. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):780-782.

Laser Effects on the Permeability of Dentin and Functional Status of Pulp of the Prepared Teeth

10.12737/3302 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-21
Author(s):  
Гришилова ◽  
E. Grishilova ◽  
Кашников ◽  
P. Kashnikov ◽  
Гаража ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Radiation ◽  
Radiation Effect ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Tactile Sensitivity ◽  
Orthopedic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Measures ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
The Impact

The use of fixed prosthesis without preventive measures to improve the resistance of the prepared teeth is unjustified from the biological point of view. The success of prosthetic treatment of the patients with non-removable prosthesis is largely determined by a therapeutic effect on the fabric of the prepared teeth and high-quality prosthetic fixation. One of the most promising ways to solve this problem is the use of laser radiation. Investigation of laser radiation effect on the permeability of dentin and pulp of the functional state of the prepared teeth consisted of experimental and clinical stages. Experiments were carried out on 16 vital teeth of two mongrel dogs. In the experiment the influence of DO on the permeability of the dentin the prepared teeth was studied by means of the microscope. The materials for the clinical study were the results of the orthopedic treatment of 105 patients aged 21 to 60 years (55 men and 50 women). To assess the state of reactivity of the teeth and the impact of treatment measures the authors used a study of temperature, tactile sensitivity, electro-odontometry by means of the device Digitest. The study demonstrated that the use of laser radiation significantly reduces the permeability of dentin prepared teeth. The use of laser radiation reduces the permeability of 40.9% compared with the control, significantly reduced the incidence of adverse results of applying non-removable dentures.

Semiprecision attachment: a connecting link between the removable and fixed prosthesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e233744
Author(s):  
Ritu Saneja ◽  
Atul Bhatnagar ◽  
Nancy Raj ◽  
Pavan Dubey
Keyword(s):  
Good Alternative ◽  
Treatment Sequence ◽  
Oral Rehabilitation ◽  
Removable Partial Denture ◽  
Partial Denture ◽  
Fixed Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Metal Framework ◽  
Careful Treatment ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis

Oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous arches requires careful treatment planning before any prosthodontic intervention. The connection of the metal framework of fixed (fixed dental prosthesis (FPD)) and removable partial denture using adhesive attachments is a good alternative prosthetic option when solely fixed prosthesis (FPD or implant) cannot be used due to anatomical limitation. Attachments are the tiny interlocking devices that act as a hybrid link to join removable prosthesis to the abutment and direct the masticatory forces along the long axis of the abutment. This joint acts as a non-rigid stress breaker, which helps in distributing the occlusal load. Precision and semiprecision attachment have always been bordered by an aura of mystery due to technique sensitive procedure and lack of knowledge. The following case describes a combined contemporary and conventional approach and treatment sequence with the use of attachments for the rehabilitation of partially edentulous arches.

scholarly journals PROSTHODONTIC TREATMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (07) ◽  
pp. 1034-1040
Author(s):  
Farzana Memon ◽  
Diya Ram Khatri ◽  
Salwa Memon
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Removable Partial Denture ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Partial Denture ◽  
Fixed Partial Denture ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Level Of Significance

Objectives: This study was carried out to assess the clinical evaluation of thepreference for prosthodontics treatment modalities in the patients visiting at the Welfare OPD,Isra Dental College, Hyderabad. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Welfare OPD,Department of Prosthodontics at Isra Dental College, Hyderabad. Period: Six months, from Jan,2016 to June, 2016. Materials and Methods: The study comprised of 191 patients belongingto both genders ranging in age from 10 years to the 60+ years, divided into six groups. Dataanalysis by distribution was performed according to the various kinds of prosthesis, includingremovable partial denture, removable complete denture, fixed partial denture, repair of RPD,immediate denture, lower CD & upper PD, obturator, upper CD & lower PD, relining of dentures,splints, over denture and provisional restorations. Data was analyzed via SPSS version 21.Descriptive statistics such as percentage, frequency distribution, cross tabulation and descriptivewere included in Data analysis. The level of significance was set at <0.05%. Results: This studyrevealed that the most of the patients were fell in group IV (41-50 years), which represents28.3% and the most common treatment were given RPD restoration (49.2%), followed by FPD(22.5%). Majority of the patients were prefer the RPD as 32 (34.0%) and 27 (28.7%) from the agegroup IV and III respectively while 13 (13.8%) patients were prefer RPD and 13 (30.8%) patientswere prefer FPD from the age group II. Out of 191 patients, 47 (50.0%) Males and 47 (50.0%)Females as well prefer the RPD while 26 (60.5%) females and 17 (39.5%) males were preferFPD as treatment modalities. Younger female patients preferred the FPD while with the increaseof age both genders prefer removable prosthesis. Conclusion: This study concludes that inthe treatment modalities, mostly patients preferred the removable partial denture, provisionalrestorations and removable complete denture. Younger patients preferred fixed partial dentureand removable partial denture as well.

scholarly journals Treatment Outcome with Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture opposing Natural Dentition

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Sushil Kar ◽  
Arvind Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Fabrication Procedure ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Natural Dentition ◽  
Mandibular Overdenture

ABSTRACT Although the conventional complete denture has been a standard treatment option for edentulous patients, it may not thoroughly fulfill the esthetic or functional needs of many denture wearers. This situation is commonly encountered, especially in relation to the mandibular ridge. Over the last decade, implant-supported overdenture has emerged as a successful alternative to the more commonly used removable prosthesis. The article discusses the fabrication procedure of an implant-assisted overdenture. How to cite this article Kar S, Tripathi A. Treatment Outcome with Implant-supported Mandibular Overdenture opposing Natural Dentition. Int J Clin Dent Res 2017;1(1):45-48.

scholarly journals Survey of current materials and impression techniques for Complete Dentures among Nepalese Prosthodontists

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Amar Bhochhibhoya ◽  
Binod Acharya ◽  
Samskar Bickram Rana ◽  
Rinu Sharma ◽  
Jemish Acharya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Complete Dentures ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Impression Materials ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Irreversible Hydrocolloid ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
Materials Used

ABSTRACTBackground: Impression making is one of the critical factors in determining success or failure of complete denture therapy. The precise reproduction of edentulous foundation is essential for retention, stability, and support of the removable prosthesis. Evidence suggests that there is variability in materials and techniques regarding impressions making for complete dentures. There is little published information on studies conducted among Nepalese Prosthodontists. The purpose of this study was to evaluate current materials andmethods for impressions for complete denture prosthodontics in Nepal. Materials & Methods: A questionnaire based survey was conducted among Nepalese Prosthodontists. Ethical approval for the beginning of the study was obtained via Institutional Review Committee, Nepal Medical College. A self-administered anonymous questionnaire was distributed to the participants. Data were analyzed by using frequency distribution.Results: Majority of responses indicated use of irreversible hydrocolloid in stock metal tray for making the preliminary impression. The selective pressure was the predominantly used impression philosophy (78.3%). The most common material for the fabrication of custom trays was autopolymerizing acrylic resin (96.7%). All respondents border molded the custom tray prior to making the final impression. The final impression materials used were zinc oxide eugenol impression paste (73.3%), polyvinylsiloxane (11.7%), polyether (11.7%) and polysulphide (3.3%). Conclusion: Although there is variability in impression materials andtechniques used by Prosthodontists in Nepal for the fabrication of complete dentures, the results showed interesting trends. Most practitioners followed the traditional techniques of complete denture impression procedures.Keywords: complete denture; custom tray; edentulism; impression.

Unconventional Dentures: A Manifestation of New Vision in Prosthesis Construction

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-108
Author(s):  
Prabal Sharma ◽  
Bhumika Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Slight Modification ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Edentulous Patient ◽  
Clinical Procedures ◽  
Removable Prosthesis ◽  
New Vision ◽  
Edentulous Patients ◽  
Natural Dentition ◽  
And Function

Removable prosthesis, that is, complete and/or partial dentures cannot function as a substitute for natural dentition, but they have been and will remain the staple treatment for edentulous patients. An edentulous patient is found to be satisfied if prosthodontic rehabilitation restores his/her function with superior esthetics. However, not every case of edentulism, either complete or partial, can be treated with conventional methods of denture fabrication. When a patient is clinically presented with complications such as severely resorbed ridge, microstomia, hyperplastic and/or flabby tissue, xerostomia, osteoma, bruxism, and labially inclined premaxilla, then it becomes difficult for the dentist to fulfill the patient’s desire for both esthetics and function. There is a need for slight modification in the regular clinical procedures by altering the impression technique or the design of the prosthesis so as to achieve best results in compromised cases, commonly known as unconventional approaches. This article intends to highlight the unconventional approaches for the fabrication of complete denture prosthesis that can be kept in mind when such cases are encountered in our daily practice.

scholarly journals A Novel Technique for the Fabrication of Hollow Denture - A Need for Resorbed Ridge

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (30) ◽  
pp. 2346-2349
Author(s):  
Rahul Suresh Jaiswal ◽  
Hema Kanathila ◽  
Anandkumar G. Patil
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Complete Denture ◽  
Main Function ◽  
Alveolar Ridge ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Base Content ◽  
Reduction Techniques ◽  
Removable Prosthesis

Removable prosthesis is probably one of the oldest types of dental therapy used to rehabilitate patients with complete or partial edentulousness. The main function of the edentulous alveolar ridge is to provide a major area of support for the dentures.1 Ill-fitting prosthesis leads to a condition where there is no longer adequate support of bone due to RRR. Hence, rehabilitation of such cases pose a clinical challenge, as there is a decreased denture foundation area for support, retention and stability.2 Residual ridge resorption (RRR) is the severe atrophy of alveolar bone underlying the mucoperiosteum. RRR affects the alveolar bone morphology, resulting in a decreased denture foundation area and increased inter-alveolar ridge space. The increase in inter-ridge distance provides a huge restorative space which results in a heavier complete denture due to greater volume of denture base material. This increase in restorative space amalgamates with the long lip length of the patient which gives rise to huge challenge to the success of the complete denture. Also, decreased denture foundation area increases the heaviness of the prosthesis and negatively affects the retention of the denture due to gravity.3 Various weight-reduction techniques have been used in the past using a rigid three-dimensional spacer, such as dental stone (Ackerman, 1955), cellophanewrapped asbestos, silicone putty during laboratory preparation to keep denture base content out of the intended hollow cavity of the prosthesis. The following case report describes a distinct lab technique for construction of hollow maxillary complete denture for a patient with severe RRR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document