scholarly journals Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants: A retrospective study

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Raikar ◽  
Pratim Talukdar ◽  
Sarala Kumari ◽  
SangramKumar Panda ◽  
VinniMary Oommen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Factors Affecting

scholarly journals A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Won Jang ◽  
Jeong-Kyung Kang ◽  
Ki Lee ◽  
Yong-Sang Lee ◽  
Pil-Kyoo Park
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Factors Affecting

scholarly journals Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 3943
Author(s):  
João Caramês ◽  
Ana Catarina Pinto ◽  
Gonçalo Caramês ◽  
Helena Francisco ◽  
Joana Fialho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
Clinical Records

This retrospective study evaluated the survival rate of short, sandblasted acid-etched surfaced implants with 6 and 8 mm lengths with at least 120 days of follow-up. Data concerning patient, implant and surgery characteristics were retrieved from clinical records. Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-surfaced tissue-level 6 mm (TL6) or 8 mm (TL8) implants or bone-level tapered 8 mm (BLT8) implants were used. Absolute and relative frequency distributions were calculated for qualitative variables and mean values and standard deviations for quantitative variables. A Cox regression model was performed to verify whether type, length and/or width influence the implant survival. The cumulative implant survival rate was assessed by time-to-event analyses (Kaplan–Meier estimator). In all, 513 patients with a mean age of 58.00 ± 12.44 years received 1008 dental implants with a mean follow-up of 21.57 ± 10.77 months. Most implants (78.17%) presented a 4.1 mm diameter, and the most frequent indication was a partially edentulous arch (44.15%). The most frequent locations were the posterior mandible (53.97%) and the posterior maxilla (31.55%). No significant differences were found in survival rates between groups of type, length and width of implant with the cumulative rate being 97.7% ± 0.5%. Within the limitations of this study, the evaluated short implants are a predictable option with high survival rates during the follow-up without statistical differences between the appraised types, lengths and widths.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the same region where previous implants failed due to peri-implantitis: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Anitua ◽  
Adriana Montalvillo ◽  
Asier Eguia ◽  
Mohammad Hamdan Alkhraisat
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
High Survival ◽  
Implant Survival ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Level

Abstract Purpose There is paucity in the studies that assess dental implants replacing failed dental implants due to peri-implantitis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of these implants in terms of implant survival and marginal bone loss. Methods Patients in this retrospective study were selected if having one or more implants removed due to peri-implantitis and the placement and loading of dental implants in the same region from April 2010 to December 2019. Information was collected about the patient's demographic data, implant dimensions, surgical and prosthetic variables. Changes in peri-implant bone level, cumulative implant survival rate and technical complications were assessed. Results Three hundred and eighty one dental implants in 146 patients that were placed in the same position or one-tooth position mesially/distally to the site of explantation were included. The patients' mean age was 63 ± 10 years. Ninety seven patients were females and 49 were males. After a mean follow-up of 34 ± 17 months, two implants failed. The cumulative survival rate was 99%. The marginal bone loss was −0.1 ± 0.6. Immediate or delay replacement of the failed implant did not affect implant survival or marginal bone stability. All the prostheses were screw-retained and presented the following complications: ceramic chipping (3 events), resin tooth fracture (1 event) and prosthetic screw loosening (1 event). Conclusions Dental implants replacing failed implants due to peri-implantitis would be an option in the management of peri-implantitis. They showed high survival rate and marginal bone stability.

Risk Factors and Early Survival Rate of Biomet 3i Dental Implants. A Retrospective Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Rasoul Heidary Postkan ◽  
Mina Kahyaie Aghdam ◽  
Ali Momen ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Early Survival

scholarly journals Survival Rate of Short and Ultrashort dental implants- Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Ferreira da Silva de Amorim ◽  
António Gomes da Silva ◽  
Mónica Alves
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants

scholarly journals Assessment of survival rate of dental implants in patients with bruxism: A 5-year retrospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajkiran Chitumalla ◽  
KV Halini Kumari ◽  
Abhilash Mohapatra ◽  
AnujSingh Parihar ◽  
KS Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants

scholarly journals Survival rate of short and ultrashort dental implants‐ retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
Marta Amorim ◽  
Mónica Alves ◽  
António Gomes Da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Dental Implants
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document