scholarly journals Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of root canal transportation using WaveOne Gold and Neoniti single-file systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saritha Vallabhaneni ◽  
Kainath Fatima ◽  
TwinoH Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Single File ◽  
Canal Transportation

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Transportation by Three NiTi Single-File Systems in Curved Canals: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eshaghali Saberi ◽  
Narges Farhad-Mollashahi ◽  
Shima Bijari ◽  
Mohammad Daryaeian
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Single File ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Level Of Significance

Introduction. This study is aimed at evaluating root canal transportation in the mesiobuccal canal of mandibular first molars prepared with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One nickel titanium (NiTi) single-file rotary systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods. In this ex vivo study, CBCT scans of 45 extracted human mandibular first molars with 20–40° curvature were obtained. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=15) for preparation of the mesiobuccal canal with One Shape, Reciproc, and M-One rotary systems according to the manufacturers’ instructions. CBCT scans were obtained again after canal preparation. Changes caused by preparation in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds were determined on CBCT scans and analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test at P≤0.05 level of significance. Results. No significant difference was noted in the amount of canal transportation among the three groups (P>0.05). M-One caused greater transportation in the apical third compared with Reciproc and One Shape, and One Shape caused greater transportation in the coronal third compared with other groups, although its magnitude was less than 0.3 mm. Conclusion. Reciproc, One Shape, and M-One are not significantly different in terms of canal transportation.

Comparison of rotary NiTi reciprocating file systems using Cone Beam CT in root canal transportation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1206-1209
Author(s):  
N. Zahid ◽  
S. A. Khan ◽  
A. Saqib ◽  
A. Tariq
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Niti Wire ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Single File ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Tomography Method

Aim: T assess the root canal transportation caused by these rotary NiTi reciprocating file systems using 3D cone beam computed tomography Method: This experimental study was conducted on 60 samples of rotary NiTi reciprocating file systems using CBCT. The extent of canal transportation and the centering ratio was analyzed using independent sample t test. The significance level was set at 95%. Results: Mean apical canal transportation was lower in wave one Gold groups as compare to Reciproc (0.8724±0.04SD vs 0.9463±0.02SD, p=0.000). Mean apical canal transportation at 5 mm was lower in wave one gold group as compare to reciproc blue group (0.5610±0.02SD vs 0.7253±0.06SD, p=0.000). Mean apical canal transportation at 8mm was lower in wave one group as compare to reciproc blue (0.358±0.03SD vs 0.5766±0.10SD, p=0.000). Conclusion: Wave one Gold had high centering ability and lower canal transportation as compare to Reciproc Blue single file system. CBCT is an efficient method of understanding Canal transportation Keywords: CBCT, NiTi wire, Root canal transportation, Reciproc blue

scholarly journals Impact of Contracted Endodontic Access Cavity on Shaping Ability of Hyflex Electrical Discharge Machining Single File Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (D) ◽  
pp. 221-228
Author(s):  
Ahmed Bayoumi ◽  
Magdy Mohamed Aly ◽  
Reham Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Electrical Discharge ◽  
Electrical Discharge Machining ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Single File ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maxillary Premolars ◽  
Canal Transportation

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effect of different access cavity designs, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), on root canal transportation, and centralization performed on two rooted maxillary premolars. METHODS: Twenty maxillary premolars were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, traditional endodontic cavities (TECs) were prepared. In Group 2, contracted endodontic cavities (CECs) were prepared. Mechanical preparation was done by HyFlex electrical discharge machining (EDM) single file in both groups. CBCT imaging was performed pre- and post-root canal preparation for calculations of root canal transportation and centering ability. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test. For transportation, teeth with CECs showed the statistically significantly highest median amount of transportation, while as for centering ability, results showed no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, HyFlex EDM prepared canals with different access cavity designs without significant shaping errors. TEC showed less transportation than CEC, while both TEC and CEC had no effect on the file centering ability.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of trunatomy and protaper gold files in curved canals using cone?beam computed tomography: An invitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-105
Author(s):  
Kadam Krutika Kiran ◽  
Vagarali Hemant ◽  
Pujar Madhu A ◽  
Tamase Aishwarya S ◽  
Sahana Umesh
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Canal Transportation ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Shaping Ability

This study aimed to compare the canal transportation and canal centering ability in the preparation of curved root canals after instrumentation with TruNatomy (TN) (TN; Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and ProTaper Gold (PG) (PG; Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK, USA) files using cone‑beam computed tomography (CBCT). 30 Single rooted extracted human teeth with root curvature ranging from 20-30° according to Schneider’s method were selected. Teeth with any visible cracks or fractures, calcifications, previous root canal treatments were excluded. The teeth were randomly assigned into two groups i.e. Group 1-TN and Group 2-PG (n = 15 each). The teeth were instrumented according to manufacturer’s guidelines for both the groups. Canals were scanned using a CBCT scanner before and after preparation to evaluate the transportation and centering ratio at 3 mm, 5 mm, and 7 mm from the apex. The data analysis was done using SPSS software and the test used was independent sample t test for comparison between the 2 groups.Data obtained suggested that TN group presented lesser canal transportation at the middle third of the root. The PG group showed better centering abitily at apical third of the root canal when both the groups were compared. TN resulted in less transportation than PG at the middle third, and PG showed better centering ability at the apical third. Overall, both systems safely prepared root canals, causing minimal errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document