scholarly journals Laparoscopic versus open-surgery catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: A meta-analysis of outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Guled Abdijalil ◽  
Shen Shuijuan
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Dialysis Patients

Surgical versus percutaneous catheter placement for peritoneal dialysis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stepan M. Esagian ◽  
Georgios A. Sideris ◽  
Muath Bishawi ◽  
Ioannis A. Ziogas ◽  
Ruediger W. Lehrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Percutaneous Catheter

scholarly journals MP549THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BODY MASS INDEX AND MORTALITY AMONG ASIAN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A META-ANALYSIS

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii630-iii632
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Xiaoxi Zeng ◽  
Grace Hong ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Ping Fu
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dialysis Patients

scholarly journals Randomized Controlled Trials for Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Catheter Placement in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei-Lan Sun ◽  
Yong Zhang(Former Corresponding Author) ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Tean Ma ◽  
Hong Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Catheter Placement ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Aim: The application of laparoscopic catheterization technology in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients has recently increased. However, the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic versus conventional open PD catheter placement are still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the complications of catheterization in PD patients and to provide a reference for choosing a PD-catheter placement technique in the clinic.Methods: We searched numerous databases, including Embase, PubMed, CNKI and the Cochrane Library, for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Results: Eight relevant studies (n=646) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed a lower incidence of catheter migration (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.90, P: 0.03) and catheter removal (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.79, P: 0.008) but a higher incidence of bleeding (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.18 to 8.97, P: 0.02) with a laparoscopic approach than with a conventional approach. There was no significant difference in the incidence of omentum adhesion (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.05 to 2.10, P: 0.24), hernia (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.09 to 1.68, P: 0.20), leakage (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.26, P: 0.23), intestinal obstruction (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.48 to 1.91, P: 0.90) or perforation (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.06 to 15.42, P: 0.97). The statistical analysis showed no significant difference in early (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.15 to 1.33, P: 0.15) , late (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.90, P: 0.76) or total (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.12, P: 0.13) peritonitis infections between the 2 groups, and there are no no significant difference in early ( OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.06 to 2.36, P: 0.30), late ( OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.33, P: 0.16) or total ( OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.02, P: 0.17) tunnel or exit-site infections between the 2 groups.Conclusion: Laparoscopic catheterization and conventional open catheter placement in PD patients have unique advantages, but laparoscopic PD catheterization may be superior to conventional open catheter placement. However, this conclusion needs to be confirmed with further large-sample-size, multi-centre, high-quality RCTs.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Residual Kidney Function and Peritoneal Membrane Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sirayut Phatthanasobhon ◽  
Surapon Nochaiwong ◽  
Kednapa Thavorn ◽  
Kajohnsak Noppakun ◽  
Setthapon Panyathong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Active Control ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Urine Volume ◽  
Peritoneal Membrane ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Membrane Function ◽  
Raas Blockade ◽  
Residual Kidney Function

AbstractWe performed a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies in adult peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of specific renin-angiotensin aldosterone systems (RAAS) blockade classes on residual kidney function and peritoneal membrane function. Key outcome parameters included the following: residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR), urine volume, anuria, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr), and acceptability of treatment. Indirect treatment effects were compared using random-effects model. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We identified 10 RCTs (n = 484) and 10 non-randomised studies (n = 3,305). Regarding changes in rGFR, RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were more efficacious than active control (SMD 0.55 [0.06–1.04] and 0.62 [0.19–1.04], respectively) with the protective effect on rGFR observed only after usage ≥12 months, and no differences among ACEIs and ARBs. Compared with active control, only ACEIs showed a significantly decreased risk of anuria (OR 0.62 [0.41–0.95]). No difference among treatments for urine volume and acceptability of treatment were observed, whereas evidence for D/P Cr is inconclusive. The small number of randomised studies and differences in outcome definitions used may limit the quality of the evidence.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document